GOP lawmakers introduce articles of impeachment against Rosenstein

About time!

GOP lawmakers introduce articles of impeachment against Rosenstein

By Olivia Beavers - 07/25/18 07:07 PM ED




A group of conservative House lawmakers on Wednesday introduced articles of impeachment against Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, the top Department of Justice (DOJ) official overseeing special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation.

The introduction of the resolution is the latest sign of escalating efforts among conservatives to oust the DOJ’s No. 2 official.

Conservative members led by Reps. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), along with nine co-sponsors, introduced the articles shortly after a meeting with DOJ officials concerning document production.

"For 9 months we’ve warned them consequences were coming, and for 9 months we’ve heard the same excuses backed up by the same unacceptable conduct. Time is up and the consequences are here. It’s time to find a new Deputy Attorney General who is serious about accountability and transparency,” Meadows, the head of the House Freedom Caucus and ally of President Trump, said in a statement.

“The DOJ is keeping information from Congress. Enough is enough. It’s time to hold Mr. Rosenstein accountable for blocking Congress’s constitutional oversight role,” said Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) in a statement.

The articles include a series of allegations against Rosenstein.

They charge that Rosenstein has a conflict of interest in Mueller's probe, stating that he is a “witness” that could be called in the ongoing investigation into potential abuse since he signed off on an FBI surveillance renewal application to wiretap Carter Page, a former adviser to the Trump campaign.

“As such, his conduct in authorizing the FISA surveillance at issue in the joint congressional investigation makes him a fact witness central to the ongoing investigation of potential FISA abuse,” read the articles of impeachment. “Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein’s failure to recuse himself in light of this inherent conflict of interest and failure to recommend the appointment of a second Special Counsel constitute dereliction of duty. Wherefore, Rod Rosenstein, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.”

“Multiple times we’ve caught DOJ officials hiding information from Congress, withholding relevant documents, or even outright ignoring Congressional subpoenas — and now we have evidence that Mr. Rosenstein signed off on a document using unverified political opposition research as a cornerstone of a FISA application to spy on an American citizen working for the Trump campaign," Meadows continued, referring to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

They also allege that Rosenstein has “repeatedly failed to produce documents” requested by the House Judiciary Committee and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that are investigating FBI and DOJ decision-making during the 2016 presidential election.

Rosenstein, they allege, has also “attempted to conceal certain facts” by overly redacting documents they requested.

The Justice Department declined to comment on the articles of impeachment, but hours before they were introduced, DOJ officials told a far different story.

Shortly before the 4 p.m. meeting between the DOJ officials and House lawmakers took place, Justice Department officials on Wednesday described in detail the steps they are taking to complete the outstanding document requests as requested by the heads of the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees.

Republicans say the FBI and DOJ have not provided all the documents they are seeking to review as part of the GOP-led investigations into the email server hildebeest used while she was serving as secretary of State, as well as the FBI's decision to launch the federal investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The DOJ officials, however, said Wednesday they have largely completed Congress's document requests, noting they are working with the lawmakers and their staff to give them the information they still want to review.

So far, the DOJ officials say they have given lawmakers access to 880,000 pages they've requested, and they continue to accept requests for new information related to House GOP probes.

The officials listed three congressional subpoenas, issued by House Republicans, that they say have either been fulfilled or that they are close to fulfilling.

One DOJ official noted that while the requests are historically high, they are working to respond to the lawmaker's records requests — and much of the responding is done quietly.


(The Hill)

880,000 pages??? do they really create that much paper trail?

About bloody time!

This is the last ditch effort to finally get the attention of those such a Rosenstein, who think they are above the Law and can simply thumb their noses at Elected Officials.

But it is an exercise in futility. It takes 2/3 of the Senate to convict. At present, that will not happen.

Things could change after the 2018 mid terms. If the Republicans could win big, guys like Rosenstein will sing a different tune when faced with the reality that if convicted, they loose not only their job, but all benefits and pension.

what rosenstein was doing is obvious. he and his allies in the fbi/doj are trying slow walk the whole thing until the november mid-term elections when they think the democrats take power in congress and they can bury this afterwards.

the impeachment is valid for one thing, he has conflict of interest with the fisa order he signed off and his hiring of Meuler that resulted from it

This is the last ditch effort to finally get the attention of those such a Rosenstein, who think they are above the Law and can simply thumb their noses at Elected Officials.

But it is an exercise in futility. It takes 2/3 of the Senate to convict. At present, that will not happen.

Things could change after the 2018 mid terms. If the Republicans could win big, guys like Rosenstein will sing a different tune when faced with the reality that if convicted, they loose not only their job, but all benefits and pension. Originally Posted by Jackie S

That's imo why they postponed the impeachment vote till later.. SO hopefully they realize they DO need to wait till they (hopefully) win more seats, that they CAN reach that 2/3rds majority.

speaker paul ryan is against the rosenstein impeachment and it looks like they're going to force a vote over Ryan's objections.