Yep, O'Blunder Cares About Jobs...riiiigghht.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2013/01/obama-jobs-council-hits-year-without-official-meeting-154524.html

He's a warrior!

During the 2010 mid-terms the GOP campaigned fiercely on the platform of job creation and, as a result of such promises, the GOP gained the majority in the House of Representatives. As new Speaker of the House, John Boehner made the welcome claim that the primary goal of the Republican Party was to increase employment in the U.S.

His exact words were: "We're going to have a relentless focus on creating jobs."

Hes a fuckstick!

During the 2010 mid-terms the GOP campaigned fiercely on the platform of job creation and, as a result of such promises, the GOP gained the majority in the House of Representatives. As new Speaker of the House, John Boehner made the welcome claim that the primary goal of the Republican Party was to increase employment in the U.S.

His exact words were: "We're going to have a relentless focus on creating jobs."

Hes a fuckstick! Originally Posted by CJ7

Not a fan of Boehner, he's a spineless RINO. But regardless, having a budget and getting the Federal fiscal house in order is a large part of economic recovery and creating jobs. The House has passed a budget every year of O'Blunders term. Not one of them has even been voted on by the Senate, run by Dirty Harry, possibly the only person in D.C. more economically illiterate than O'Blunder. The only budgets voted on in the Senate have been O'Blunders, all of which went down in bipartisan flames.

Not a fan of Boehner, he's a spineless RINO. But regardless, having a budget and getting the Federal fiscal house in order is a large part of economic recovery and creating jobs. The House has passed a budget every year of O'Blunders term. Not one of them has even been voted on by the Senate, run by Dirty Harry, possibly the only person in D.C. more economically illiterate than O'Blunder. The only budgets voted on in the Senate have been O'Blunders, all of which went down in bipartisan flames. Originally Posted by EXTXOILMAN

apparently, youre too stupid to understand why the senate refuses to vote on house budgets

apparently, youre too stupid to understand why the senate refuses to vote on house budgets Originally Posted by CJ7

OK, you explain it to me. House budgets pass easily, Senate doesn't even have an up-or-down vote on it for show. Yet, O'Blunders proposals get ZERO votes from anyone in either chamber for three years running. Enlighten me, what am I missing??

OK, you explain it to me. House budgets pass easily, Senate doesn't even have an up-or-down vote on it for show. Yet, O'Blunders proposals get ZERO votes from anyone in either chamber for three years running. Enlighten me, what am I missing?? Originally Posted by EXTXOILMAN

uhhh, try the fact the house budget contained i.e. making the tax cuts permanent, and deep cuts in social programs, basically EVERYTHING that was on the republican agenda, and EVERYTHING the dem senate opposed..

if a senate budget was or had been handed to the house that contained EVERYTHING the dems wanted and NOTHING the republicans wanted, do you honestly believe the house would sign off on said budget and let the dems have their way?

I dont think so ..

Lower taxes and cuts in government deficit spending...oh my!! The Senate doesn't initiate the budget, the House does. The Senate is supposed to take what the House passes, mark it up, negotiate, etc., then send it back. Not shove it under Dirty Harry's desk like it never happened. Damn, CBJ, you're really showing your ignorance. I almost feel bad for ya. This is Civics 101, you should really educate yourself.

Lower taxes and cuts in government deficit spending...oh my!! The Senate doesn't initiate the budget, the House does. The Senate is supposed to take what the House passes, mark it up, negotiate, etc., then send it back. Not shove it under Dirty Harry's desk like it never happened. Damn, CBJ, you're really showing your ignorance. I almost feel bad for ya. This is Civics 101, you should really educate yourself. Originally Posted by EXTXOILMAN

exactly ! up to the dirty harry point...

congress as a whole plays political football with a budget, and at the end of the day the house yammers how the senate refused to pass a budget knowing full well the republican base is stupid enough to lay it off in the dem senate .. welcome to stupid ET

Damn, CBJ, you should just stop digging. You're in way over your head. How can a budget pass through both Houses, or not, if it's never put forward for a vote in one of those Houses??

Damn, CBJ, you should just stop digging. You're in way over your head. How can a budget pass through both Houses, or not, if it's never put forward for a vote in one of those Houses?? Originally Posted by EXTXOILMAN

the Ryan budget is a perfect example ... you thing the dems would vote on that budget as is, amend it, or as a majority ignore it?

put the budget shoe on the other foot (dem majority house) (republican majority senate) and tell me the senate if wouldnt do the same damn thing ..

tyell ya what ET ... since youre the board budget expert, you explain to the board exactly why the 109th congress failed to pass a budget ... BTW, the republicans had a majority in BOTH houses

you have the floor sir

the Ryan budget is a perfect example ... you thing the dems would vote on that budget as is, amend it, or as a majority ignore it?

put the budget shoe on the other foot (dem majority house) (republican majority senate) and tell me the senate if wouldnt do the same damn thing .. Originally Posted by CJ7

We have had a dem majority house and a republican majority senate before and funny I don't recall this ever happening. Keep digging CBJ7.

We have had a dem majority house and a republican majority senate before and funny I don't recall this ever happening. Keep digging CBJ7. Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

how about you laughing boy, in your infinite wisdom (snick) please tell everyone why a republican majority house and senate failed to pass a budget ..



It happened with the budgets for fiscal years 1999, 2003, 2005 and 2007. And remember that the budget for any given fiscal year is something dealt with during the prior calendar year. That means the fiscal year 2007 budget was dealt with in the Republican 109th Congress.


source: the Congressional Research Service (PDF).

During the 2010 mid-terms the GOP campaigned fiercely on the platform of job creation and, as a result of such promises, the GOP gained the majority in the House of Representatives. As new Speaker of the House, John Boehner made the welcome claim that the primary goal of the Republican Party was to increase employment in the U.S.

His exact words were: "We're going to have a relentless focus on creating jobs."

Hes a fuckstick! Originally Posted by CJ7

" The House has approved more than 15 bills that, if enacted, would immediately help to grow the economy without more failed stimulus spending."

http://www.gop.gov/policy-news/11/10...-bills-stalled