Ex Obama advisors say that Iran deal is a scam and Obama is being played

What they really mean is that we are being played. I suspect that Obama knows exactly what he is doing with his Muslim/Iranian/communist chief advisor Valeria Jarrett. He is trying to play us by saying this deal will work. Trusted advisors say otherwise now. Maybe it is time for some books to be written.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/wo...alks.html?_r=0

What they really mean is that we are being played. I suspect that Obama knows exactly what he is doing with his Muslim/Iranian/communist chief advisor Valeria Jarrett. He is trying to play us by saying this deal will work. Trusted advisors say otherwise now. Maybe it is time for some books to be written.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/wo...alks.html?_r=0 Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Maybe it's time to wonder why they're former advisors. Muslim and communist don't jive together, but to someone oblivious to facts, why should that bother you?

Maybe it's time to wonder why they're former advisors. Muslim and communist don't jive together, but to someone oblivious to facts, why should that bother you? Originally Posted by WombRaider

I would ask you if you want to put money on that but I don't gamble....even if it is a sure thing.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2...rretts-family/

Again we see this same connection between Obama and the forces of evil. His mentor Frank Marshall was an unrepentant communist, his mother was a leftist, his father was a socialist Muslim, his "next door neighbor" William Ayres was a communist and terrorist, his chief advisor going back years had a declared communist for a father, her grandfather was a communist, she grew up in Iran and has many Muslim contacts in the Muslim brotherhood and sisterhood.

It doesn't do any good if I lay out the dots if you're too stupid or lazy to look at them.

What they really mean is that we are being played. I suspect that Obama knows exactly what he is doing with his Muslim/Iranian/communist chief advisor Valeria Jarrett. He is trying to play us by saying this deal will work. Trusted advisors say otherwise now. Maybe it is time for some books to be written.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/25/wo...alks.html?_r=0 Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

odummer has buffaloed his way through to his goals of "transformation (read; destruction) of America" by out right, bold faced lying (GRUBER, GRUBER,GRUBER ) about the health care system ( one-sixth of the national economy ) and FORCING his Alinsky style "Hope and Change" onto the country. And with SCOTUS bending over and supplying their own taxpayer paid for Vaseline for the bath house boy to ream them at will, we can expect him to go "full rouge" with his contempt for the Constitution and the laws of this country.

I would ask you if you want to put money on that but I don't gamble....even if it is a sure thing.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2...rretts-family/

Again we see this same connection between Obama and the forces of evil. His mentor Frank Marshall was an unrepentant communist, his mother was a leftist, his father was a socialist Muslim, his "next door neighbor" William Ayres was a communist and terrorist, his chief advisor going back years had a declared communist for a father, her grandfather was a communist, she grew up in Iran and has many Muslim contacts in the Muslim brotherhood and sisterhood.

It doesn't do any good if I lay out the dots if you're too stupid or lazy to look at them. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Ayers wasn't his next door neighbor. You'll connect whichever dots you want, regardless of whether they actually connect or not. Communism by itself is not evil, firstly.

odummer has buffaloed his way through to his goals of "transformation (read; destruction) of America" by out right, bold faced lying (GRUBER, GRUBER,GRUBER ) about the health care system ( one-sixth of the national economy ) and FORCING his Alinsky style "Hope and Change" onto the country. And with SCOTUS bending over and supplying their own taxpayer paid for Vaseline for the bath house boy to ream them at will, we can expect him to go "full rouge" with his contempt for the Constitution and the laws of this country. Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

'Full rouge'? Is that what you call it when you come down to the dumpster all made up in your sunday finery and church makeup? You simply repeat talking points and someone else's words, probably Mark Levin or his ilk, with nothing original added.

Ayers wasn't his next door neighbor. You'll connect whichever dots you want, regardless of whether they actually connect or not. Communism by itself is not evil, firstly. Originally Posted by WombRaider

That's why it was in quotes dumb ass. Seemed more pithy than writing "some guy in the neighborhood". Obama planned his first campaign in the living room of two terrorists.

That's why it was in quotes dumb ass. Seemed more pithy than writing "some guy in the neighborhood". Obama planned his first campaign in the living room of two terrorists. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Who were against a war that in retrospect we should have never been in. Who was wrong and who was right about Vietnam? You forget that little part.

deflection time

deflection time Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Yes, you are deflecting. Good that you recognize it. Now, who was wrong and who was right about Vietnam? That was a war that many of that generation were against and rightly so. You want to defend Vietnam now?

Only a few more days left before the current "deadline" expires! In other news the Iranian Parliment voted no to inspections.

Send in Trump.

Fifty-one!

Maybe it's time to wonder why they're former advisors? Originally Posted by WombRaider

What a fucking unbelievable knee-jerk apologist you are for everything Odumbo does. You would follow him over the cliff while he smashes US national security on the rocks. Read this, shithead. Those former advisors jumping ship include some of the most experienced foreign policy hands in the Democratic party. That's a red flag for ALL OF US.


Iran Diplomacy Doubters

Former top Obama officials have grave misgivings about a nuclear deal.

June 25, 2015 7:26 p.m. ET

Doubts about President Obama’s Iran diplomacy are deepening, and some of the gravest misgivings are coming from his former top officials. That’s the import of a statement Wednesday from a bipartisan group under the auspices of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

In measured language, the statement offers a list of musts for a good nuclear deal. They include granting nuclear inspectors access to all Iranian sites, including military ones; lifting sanctions only after Iran meets its nuclear obligations; requiring Tehran to come clean on its past nuclear work; and limiting the number of advanced centrifuges Iran can test and deploy. From what we know so far, Iran has balked on all of these points.

The signers include James Cartwright, former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who became known as “Obama’s General.” Another is former CIA Director David Petraeus. Then there is Dennis Ross, Mr. Obama’s Iran czar in his first term; Gary Samore, previously Mr. Obama’s arms-control coordinator; James Jeffrey, formerly Mr. Obama’s ambassador in Baghdad; and Howard Berman, the last Democrat to chair the House Foreign Relations Committee. Some Republicans are also on the list, but a neoconservative cabal this is not.

President Obama and his aides often dismiss opponents of his nuclear diplomacy as always preferring war over diplomacy. But the striking fact is how widespread the concerns are as the White House appears to make ever more concessions.


.

What a fucking unbelievable knee-jerk apologist you are for everything Odumbo does. You would follow him over the cliff while he smashes US national security on the rocks. Read this, shithead. Those former advisors jumping ship include some of the most experienced foreign policy hands in the Democratic party. That's a red flag for ALL OF US.


Iran Diplomacy Doubters

Former top Obama officials have grave misgivings about a nuclear deal.

June 25, 2015 7:26 p.m. ET

Doubts about President Obama’s Iran diplomacy are deepening, and some of the gravest misgivings are coming from his former top officials. That’s the import of a statement Wednesday from a bipartisan group under the auspices of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

In measured language, the statement offers a list of musts for a good nuclear deal. They include granting nuclear inspectors access to all Iranian sites, including military ones; lifting sanctions only after Iran meets its nuclear obligations; requiring Tehran to come clean on its past nuclear work; and limiting the number of advanced centrifuges Iran can test and deploy. From what we know so far, Iran has balked on all of these points.

The signers include James Cartwright, former Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who became known as “Obama’s General.” Another is former CIA Director David Petraeus. Then there is Dennis Ross, Mr. Obama’s Iran czar in his first term; Gary Samore, previously Mr. Obama’s arms-control coordinator; James Jeffrey, formerly Mr. Obama’s ambassador in Baghdad; and Howard Berman, the last Democrat to chair the House Foreign Relations Committee. Some Republicans are also on the list, but a neoconservative cabal this is not.

President Obama and his aides often dismiss opponents of his nuclear diplomacy as always preferring war over diplomacy. But the striking fact is how widespread the concerns are as the White House appears to make ever more concessions.


. Originally Posted by lustylad

Why don't you link the article you pulled this from, you copy and pasting cocksucker? Because it's an opinion piece and not news? Perhaps. Here's the link, from the WSJ, that bastion of cocksuckery at its finest. What it fails to point out is that no one is going to get Iran to concede all those points. Abraham Lincoln couldn't get Iran to concede on those points. When you are the side who wants something to change, charging in and demanding things is not the way to get them. Iran would be happy with the status quo. We are the ones who want change. We must incentivize those changes or otherwise why would they concede to anything?

http://www.wsj.com/articles/iran-dip...ers-1435272447