Yep.. a little different than the norm.
Lets say... hypothetically of COURSE... that you have two law schools in your area. For the purposes of this question, lets also assume that one has both the GPA and LSAT score to pretty much go wherever they want, but are locked to a geographic area.
School 1- This school is a lower level Tier 1 school. Decent reputation, decent standing in the rankings, etc.
School 2- This school is a Tier 2 at best. Lower ranking (In the bottom 1/3 of the nation).
Now.. School 1 is the better school from the standpoint of ranking.. but with the "hypothetical" scores and GPA mentioned earlier, School 2 would offer what would essentially amount to a "free ride". So.. school 1 would put a person about 60K in the hole after scholarships and school 2 has the potential for zero debt.
Which school do you choose and why? Part of me thinks that the school with the lower ranking but potential for no debt is a great way to go-- as a career in law isn't necessarily the path to riches... but would going to a lower level school have a drastic impact on the employability of said student after graduation?
Thoughts?