30 people at Kaine rally in FLA.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016...0-people-show/

They are really knocking it out of the park. LOL

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016...0-people-show/

They are really knocking it out of the park. LOL Originally Posted by canuckeight

WOW! Tim Kaine Holds Rally and ONLY 30 PEOPLE Show Up!

Jim Hoft Oct 24th, 2016 10:59 pm 1850 Comments
THIS IS JUST EFFING INCREDIBLE!
Hillary’s VP pick Tim Kaine Held a Rally today AND NOBODY CAME!
There were literally like 30 people there — in West Palm Beach, Florida.



And that includes journalists and operatives.

ahahahaha. Last week the same thing happened to poor Kaine ..

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016...m-kaine-miami/

this sums it up nicely ...

"The rally was so small he spoke from the bed of a pickup truck.
Because Hillary and Tim Kaine and all the Wall Street money are average folks just like you."


you can't make this shit up even on the Interweb of Things yeah libtards?


meanwhile last week ...

about 650 Trump supporters watched Pence give a speech in the rain. yes libatrds ... your VP nominee can't get 100 people total in sunny Miami at two daytime rallies combined and Pence gets 6 times the crowd in a rain storm. In October in Virginia ahahahaa


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016...irginia-rally/

I thought I read that Chelsea drew 15

hate to bust your bubble:http://www.politico.com/story/2012/1...-crowds-082348

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...-romney-in-pa/
http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_ht...workers-video/


Bottom line size of rallies have little to do with actual turnout or predicting an election. Romney in 2012 at some rallies had 30,000 people but he still got destroyed in the general election both electorally and overall numbers. Sanders had much larger crowds than Hillary and still lost the primary. What really counts is who comes out on November 8th.


Not to be outdone, Donald Trump recently bragged that the size of his rally in a Phoenix hotel ballroom “blows away anything that Bernie Sanders has gotten.” Most journalists covering the event pegged the crowd’s size at 4,000 to 5,000. Trump’s staff told Fox News that 15,000 supporters were on hand. Trump later tweeted that he had attracted more than 20,000 (in a ballroom with a maximum legal occupancy of 2,158).

Some in the media were duly impressed by Trump’s crowds on his recent western tour (he also held events in Las Vegas and Los Angeles). ABC News described the campaign events in an online story headlined, “Trump Talks Immigration to Record Crowds in Border State.” The headline of MSNBC’s story about Trump’s weekend: “Donald Trump draws massive crowds during campaign swing.”

I have bad news for Sanders, Trump, their supporters and some in the news media fixated on the numbers at candidates’ rallies: The size of rallies has long been a flawed measure of a campaign’s vitality. Journalists often survey an arena brimming with enthusiastic supporters and mistakenly use a head count to gauge the campaign’s prospects. Candidates and their staffs are eager to bolster that faulty notion, sometimes feeding reporters exaggerated crowd estimates (there’s no evidence Sanders’ campaign has done that).

Such a misreading happened in 2012 when spokespeople for President Obama and GOP nominee Mitt Romney bragged about the size of their rallies and pointed to enthusiastic crowds as indications of growing support. Consider this piece in Politico less than a month before the election:

It may be his supporters, or it may be those getting a glimpse of the GOP nominee for the first time, but Mitt Romney’s crowds are getting bigger in the campaign’s final stretch.

Since his strong presidential debate performance last Wednesday night, Romney has seen a bump in the number of people attending his rallies, which the campaign calls a sign of new enthusiasm in the final month of the campaign.

In the past week alone, Romney’s campaign says at least three of its rallies have, per the campaign’s crowd counts, exceeded 10,000 people: an Oct. 4 event with country singer Trace Adkins in Fishersville, Va., which was Romney’s largest event ever at 14,000 people; a rally last Sunday in Port St. Lucie, Fla., that drew 12,000; and one in Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, that fire marshals estimated also drew 12,000. . .

“Republicans and Republican-leaning independents are more fired up about this election, and fired up about Gov. Romney,” Gorka said. “The debate helped crystallize that energy and it’s translating to our events.”

Long lines to vote.

WOW! Tim Kaine Holds Rally and ONLY 30 PEOPLE Show Up!

Jim Hoft Oct 24th, 2016 10:59 pm 1850 Comments
THIS IS JUST EFFING INCREDIBLE!
Hillary’s VP pick Tim Kaine Held a Rally today AND NOBODY CAME!
There were literally like 30 people there — in West Palm Beach, Florida.



And that includes journalists and operatives.

ahahahaha. Last week the same thing happened to poor Kaine ..

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016...m-kaine-miami/

this sums it up nicely ...

"The rally was so small he spoke from the bed of a pickup truck.
Because Hillary and Tim Kaine and all the Wall Street money are average folks just like you."


you can't make this shit up even on the Interweb of Things yeah libtards?


meanwhile last week ...

about 650 Trump supporters watched Pence give a speech in the rain. yes libatrds ... your VP nominee can't get 100 people total in sunny Miami at two daytime rallies combined and Pence gets 6 times the crowd in a rain storm. In October in Virginia ahahahaa


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016...irginia-rally/

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Mebbe they'd get more people to show up to their rallies if their operatives, LUBE and EKIM, would offer free rim jobs and dingle berry picking for those that showed up ! Certainly LUBE and EKIM would offer their services for free to help their favorite lyin liberal shrilLAIRy !

Although 30 is pretty bad but I find Kaine to be boring it would be more of a shock to me if Kaine drew a large crowd most people could care less about a VP. But what good did Romney huge rallies do for him ? They are bad indicators it only shows that people don't have more important things to do- especially if a rally is held on a week day - aren't those people suppose to be at work ?

hate to bust your bubble:http://www.politico.com/story/2012/1...-crowds-082348

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...-romney-in-pa/
http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_ht...workers-video/


Bottom line size of rallies have little to do with actual turnout or predicting an election. Romney in 2012 at some rallies had 30,000 people but he still got destroyed in the general election both electorally and overall numbers. Sanders had much larger crowds than Hillary and still lost the primary. What really counts is who comes out on November 8th.


Not to be outdone, Donald Trump recently bragged that the size of his rally in a Phoenix hotel ballroom “blows away anything that Bernie Sanders has gotten.” Most journalists covering the event pegged the crowd’s size at 4,000 to 5,000. Trump’s staff told Fox News that 15,000 supporters were on hand. Trump later tweeted that he had attracted more than 20,000 (in a ballroom with a maximum legal occupancy of 2,158).

Some in the media were duly impressed by Trump’s crowds on his recent western tour (he also held events in Las Vegas and Los Angeles). ABC News described the campaign events in an online story headlined, “Trump Talks Immigration to Record Crowds in Border State.” The headline of MSNBC’s story about Trump’s weekend: “Donald Trump draws massive crowds during campaign swing.”

I have bad news for Sanders, Trump, their supporters and some in the news media fixated on the numbers at candidates’ rallies: The size of rallies has long been a flawed measure of a campaign’s vitality. Journalists often survey an arena brimming with enthusiastic supporters and mistakenly use a head count to gauge the campaign’s prospects. Candidates and their staffs are eager to bolster that faulty notion, sometimes feeding reporters exaggerated crowd estimates (there’s no evidence Sanders’ campaign has done that).

Such a misreading happened in 2012 when spokespeople for President Obama and GOP nominee Mitt Romney bragged about the size of their rallies and pointed to enthusiastic crowds as indications of growing support. Consider this piece in Politico less than a month before the election:

It may be his supporters, or it may be those getting a glimpse of the GOP nominee for the first time, but Mitt Romney’s crowds are getting bigger in the campaign’s final stretch.

Since his strong presidential debate performance last Wednesday night, Romney has seen a bump in the number of people attending his rallies, which the campaign calls a sign of new enthusiasm in the final month of the campaign.

In the past week alone, Romney’s campaign says at least three of its rallies have, per the campaign’s crowd counts, exceeded 10,000 people: an Oct. 4 event with country singer Trace Adkins in Fishersville, Va., which was Romney’s largest event ever at 14,000 people; a rally last Sunday in Port St. Lucie, Fla., that drew 12,000; and one in Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, that fire marshals estimated also drew 12,000. . .

“Republicans and Republican-leaning independents are more fired up about this election, and fired up about Gov. Romney,” Gorka said. “The debate helped crystallize that energy and it’s translating to our events.” Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt

MSNBC? Is that the same network Piss Down My leg Chris Matthews works for? Or Adams apple Roger Maddow and her fag sidekick Chris Hayes
Attachment 582046

hate to bust your bubble:http://www.politico.com/story/2012/1...-crowds-082348

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...-romney-in-pa/
http://www.frugal-cafe.com/public_ht...workers-video/


Bottom line size of rallies have little to do with actual turnout or predicting an election. Romney in 2012 at some rallies had 30,000 people but he still got destroyed in the general election both electorally and overall numbers. Sanders had much larger crowds than Hillary and still lost the primary. What really counts is who comes out on November 8th.


Not to be outdone, Donald Trump recently bragged that the size of his rally in a Phoenix hotel ballroom “blows away anything that Bernie Sanders has gotten.” Most journalists covering the event pegged the crowd’s size at 4,000 to 5,000. Trump’s staff told Fox News that 15,000 supporters were on hand. Trump later tweeted that he had attracted more than 20,000 (in a ballroom with a maximum legal occupancy of 2,158).

Some in the media were duly impressed by Trump’s crowds on his recent western tour (he also held events in Las Vegas and Los Angeles). ABC News described the campaign events in an online story headlined, “Trump Talks Immigration to Record Crowds in Border State.” The headline of MSNBC’s story about Trump’s weekend: “Donald Trump draws massive crowds during campaign swing.”

I have bad news for Sanders, Trump, their supporters and some in the news media fixated on the numbers at candidates’ rallies: The size of rallies has long been a flawed measure of a campaign’s vitality. Journalists often survey an arena brimming with enthusiastic supporters and mistakenly use a head count to gauge the campaign’s prospects. Candidates and their staffs are eager to bolster that faulty notion, sometimes feeding reporters exaggerated crowd estimates (there’s no evidence Sanders’ campaign has done that).

Such a misreading happened in 2012 when spokespeople for President Obama and GOP nominee Mitt Romney bragged about the size of their rallies and pointed to enthusiastic crowds as indications of growing support. Consider this piece in Politico less than a month before the election:

It may be his supporters, or it may be those getting a glimpse of the GOP nominee for the first time, but Mitt Romney’s crowds are getting bigger in the campaign’s final stretch.

Since his strong presidential debate performance last Wednesday night, Romney has seen a bump in the number of people attending his rallies, which the campaign calls a sign of new enthusiasm in the final month of the campaign.

In the past week alone, Romney’s campaign says at least three of its rallies have, per the campaign’s crowd counts, exceeded 10,000 people: an Oct. 4 event with country singer Trace Adkins in Fishersville, Va., which was Romney’s largest event ever at 14,000 people; a rally last Sunday in Port St. Lucie, Fla., that drew 12,000; and one in Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, that fire marshals estimated also drew 12,000. . .

“Republicans and Republican-leaning independents are more fired up about this election, and fired up about Gov. Romney,” Gorka said. “The debate helped crystallize that energy and it’s translating to our events.” Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt

That's because there is 240 million Butt Fuckers like you who happily vote for these con artists. They don't need to go to rallies, they don't care about the issues either. Besides they wouldn't understand the issues any how. They just want to know that their candidate says nice things about their useless asses and strokes their pathetic egos.

Jim

I want to make sure this video gets seen! MAGA! TRUMP2016! Fuckem!!!

Long lines to vote. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Not where I voted today. I was in and out in 10 minutes.

That's because there is 240 million Butt Fuckers like you who happily vote for these con artists. They don't need to go to rallies, they don't care about the issues either. Besides they wouldn't understand the issues any how. They just want to know that their candidate says nice things about their useless asses and strokes their pathetic egos.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Jim how many rallies have you been to in your life or this year? It's 2016 going to rallies is pointless when there's internet and tv and we can hear all their debates.
It's expected that over 100 million people will vote - if you add up all of the rallies trump has had including the primaries he drew good crowds but the total will be way under 1 million even if he were to have drawn 1 million that's 1 percent of the total voting population.

Jim how many rallies have you been to in your life or this year? It's 2016 going to rallies is pointless when there's internet and tv and we can hear all their debates.
It's expected that over 100 million people will vote - if you add up all of the rallies trump has had including the primaries he drew good crowds but the total will be way under 1 million even if he were to have drawn 1 million that's 1 percent of the total voting population. Originally Posted by Luke_Wyatt

That's a stupid question to ask me if I go to political rallies, of course I don't. But the fact still remains Clinton's rallies don't have nearly the turn out as Trump's. The reason being, Clinton supporters are too busy going to Trump rallies causing trouble, lol.

Jim

Not where I voted today. I was in and out in 10 minutes. Originally Posted by NiceGuy53

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politic...-begun/2299871



http://www.wftv.com/news/local/thous...ting/460081004

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politic...-begun/2299871





http://www.wftv.com/news/local/thousands-head-to-the-polls-on-first-day-of-florida-early-voting/460081004 Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Yesterday was the first day of early voting in Florida. After a few days, those long lines will decrease considerably. If you bothered to read past the headline, the article also stated that in other areas of Florida, the lines weren't that long.

I initially over looked the second article that you cited. But again if you read past the headline, it specifically states that most voters were able to vote in less than 5 minutes on the first day of early voting.