Joe bloe,
Your premise is based around the fact that the media tells us little to nothing about the background of either person....and from that you deduce that the black kid was a thug and the white guy is a saint....which leads you to further deduce that it was justified for the black guy to be shot to death.
I don't think i really have much to add to that.
Originally Posted by Doove
My deduction is based on my belief that main stream media is biased to the left and that they are dishonest. I believe this because I have observed biased dishonest behavior by the main stream media my entire life.
If the main stream media is biased to the left and dishonest, it stands to reason that they will want to portray Trayvon as an innocent choirboy whether he is or not. If main stream media reports scant information about Trayvon's background. It's reasonable to assume they couldn't find exculpatory information and that's why they don't have much to say. It's like the old saying "If you don't have anyting good to say, then you should say nothing at all"
The same reasoning applies to the lack of details about Zimmerman. It's reasonable to assume that background research has been done about him. If the dishonest, biased, left leaning media has little to say about Zimmerman's background, it's reasonable to assume that they weren't able to find anything bad.