"The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars (like Vicky),
But in ourselves . . .”
No; well-reviewed, outstanding Vicky is (obviously) neither ugly (!) (I guess saying that sort of thing by HSL and Jmeoffe is allowed now??)
The problem is that a small group of determined attackers including HSL and Jmeoffe continue to falsely attack not just Vicky but Foxy and other Blue girls as aged, ugly, poor service, etc.
After Jmeoffe, HSL's partner in crime here (see his false and illegal
Staff editallegation in
his post above), posted a
vicious review saying that Vicky was "50" with poor service, I posted
a refutation quoting reviews from diverse experienced hands in awe of her service, including those who frequently review other spas but have never (or rarely) reviewed Blue Spa before, rightly exclaiming in glowing terms how highly they thought of Vicky.
HSL, by contrast, is in
the group that, absurdly, completely denies that any AMP providers are in their 20s (though as so many reviews confirm, most at Blue right now are!) while in their posts promoting providers who truly
are close to 50 (see for example HSL's recent
"AMP Milf Review" of one he himself put at 46), but who others, after trying them, said offer
poor IOP and more limited service than he advertised.
As Victor Hugo said,
“[t]he wicked envy and hate; it is their way of admiring.”
Well, at least we
all agree that sweet Vicky's service is off the charts!