mass shooting in Australia stopped by men with guns

JD Barleycorn's Avatar
http://www.breitbart.com/national-se...east-two-dead/

Officers were ordered to wear their guns even at their desks. You would think that they would have taken all the guns away from the police. You know, less guns, less crime....to paraphrase the Nazi Baby Killer.
One incident does not an epidemic make. The truth of the matter is that what they did in Australia has worked. They haven't had a mass shooting since.

"In 2012, the Guardian published new statistics drawn from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime and Small Arms Survey showing only "30 homicides by firearm" annually in Australia, or "0.14 per 100,000 population."

"The U.S. statistics are bloated by comparison. Over the same period, Americans suffered "9,146 homicides by firearm," at a rate of 2.97 for every 100,000 people. Sixty percent of murders in the U.S. are committed with a gun, according to the Guardian, compared to 11.5% in Australia."

http://mic.com/articles/123049/19-ye...d-in-australia
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Hurry JDrunk! There's a late model HUFF leaving for Oz in the morning. Be on it!
Hurry JDrunk! There's a late model HUFF leaving for Oz in the morning. Be on it! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
And don't forget to arrange for a stop on the remote island where the camouflaged 777 is parked, carefully camouflaged by netting and shrubbery.

JDIdiot, please send us a picture. You hear?
How could it have been a mass shooting if it was stopped?
Yssup Rider's Avatar
More nonsense...
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
Oh yes, how was it stopped? By men with guns. Tell that to the Nazi Baby Killer.

FYI, when you use a word like "bloated" in a story that is editorializing and not reporting.

An epidemic can be found in Chicago and almost every other liberal managed city in the country.
Oh yes, how was it stopped? By men with guns. Tell that to the Nazi Baby Killer.

FYI, when you use a word like "bloated" in a story that is editorializing and not reporting.

An epidemic can be found in Chicago and almost every other liberal managed city in the country. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
If you look at states Ill is way down the list judy.
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
If you look at states Ill is way down the list judy. Originally Posted by i'va biggen
Not state Mr. Deflector, city, city, CITY. Try to pay attention.

Actually Chicago holds two places for the countries highest murder rates (by city); Harvey, IL at number 11 and East Chicago at 15. Leading the list, St. Louis, IL. Not Missouri but Illinois. Three of the must murderous cities are in Illinois.

http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/top...r-rate-cities/
Not state Mr. Deflector, city, city, CITY. Try to pay attention.

Actually Chicago holds two places for the countries highest murder rates (by city); Harvey, IL at number 11 and East Chicago at 15. Leading the list, St. Louis, IL. Not Missouri but Illinois. Three of the must murderous cities are in Illinois.

http://www.neighborhoodscout.com/top...r-rate-cities/ Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Actually if you consider murders by population chi town is way down the list judy.
Actually if you consider murders by population chi town is way down the list judy. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Report: 60 murders makes last month deadliest September in Chicago since 2002

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-6...go-since-2002/

eehhbuhurrrrrrr!




Report: 60 murders makes last month deadliest September in Chicago since 2002

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-6...go-since-2002/

eehhbuhurrrrrrr!




Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
It's becoming a sport now to watch liberals step in shit. They get 'extra points' of they roll in it like woomby, assup and Lil'cotex !
Report: 60 murders makes last month deadliest September in Chicago since 2002

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-6...go-since-2002/

eehhbuhurrrrrrr!




Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
Not bad, but there were more in the KC area than that whiffy.
Only in the fevered imaginations of the RWWhack'tards does the idea exist that more guns means less firearms' deaths.

There will be 92 deaths today in the US where the instrumentality utilized to cause the death was a firearm. The one I read about this morning had an 11 year old boy shooting an 8 year old girl who wanted to see a neighbor's puppy.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...rl-8/73433082/

Once again, the 2nd Amendment prevails. Makes you feel all warm and fuzzy, doesn't it? Here is a picture of the 8 year old who is laying dead in a morgue somewhere as you read this....torn apart by a 12 gauge shotgun blast.

By the way, Australia had less than 200 firearms deaths in 2011. Roughly two days worth in the US.

You fucking figure it out.
Attached Images File Type: jpg 635797117162890283-girl-killed-100615.jpg (38.7 KB, 58 views)
They simply value their right to cling to a gun more than they do human life. It's the same delusional tendencies that allow them to believe the universe was created in 6 days. They just don't get it. They also have a strange and adversarial relationship with their government. They both love and hate it.