You know...doing the same thing over and over...40 times, in fact...and expecting different results?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...424_story.html
It is dumb; I don't think they have even considered cutting off spending for obamacare. The House could do that unilaterally since all spending bills must originate in the house. Originally Posted by WhirlawayThe whackadoos have considered it, and urged it to be considered, over and over. Your boy Crazy Cruz proposed it in the senate just the other day.
It is dumb; I don't think they have even considered cutting off spending for obamacare. The House could do that unilaterally since all spending bills must originate in the house. Originally Posted by WhirlawayActually, it is bills that raise revenue must originate in the house. Check Article I, Section 7.
The house won't do it because it will lead to a government shutdown. And, they will get blamed. WTF? Do I stutter?
Eric Holder knows it but doesn't want to say it....fucking mealy-mouthed idiot.
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/...eader-stammers Originally Posted by timpage
Apparently Timmie has never heard the adage that politics is the work of repetition. You keep going back to the well until you get what you want. By the way, things did happen differently. More democrats are coming on board for the repeal with every vote. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Apparently Timmie has never heard the adage that politics is the work of repetition. You keep going back to the well until you get what you want. By the way, things did happen differently. More democrats are coming on board for the repeal with every vote. Originally Posted by JD BarleycornIt's a waste of time and is done strictly for political purposes.....so the house republicans can say to the mouth-breathers like you "Look, we're trying to overturn it. Keep voting my dumb ass into office."