Supposedly Wikileaks has a huge file encrypted with a 256 character key that it will release if Assange is arrested. Anybody care to guess what's in the file? Maybe Obama's college grades or his Nigerian birth certificate?
If past wikileaks releases are an indicator, it's Needless Markup's $250 chocolate chip cookie recipe.
- gnadfly
- 12-06-2010, 11:17 AM
- boardman
- 12-06-2010, 11:49 AM
Somebody needs to take that asshole out. What he is doing is a form of terrorism IMO.
The government is doing shit behind our backs, fine, I get it. I don't like it and if they are I want to know(maybe).
If leaking this shit is really putting Americans in harms way then take him out even if everything gets released. We can regroup after the chaos but pandering to the guy is simply giving him what he wants. Just another sign that Obama is a pussy.
I'm not dismissing the fact that he got the info in the first place. That's a serious problem but if we take his ammunition away from him then the immediate threat is resolved.
The government is doing shit behind our backs, fine, I get it. I don't like it and if they are I want to know(maybe).
If leaking this shit is really putting Americans in harms way then take him out even if everything gets released. We can regroup after the chaos but pandering to the guy is simply giving him what he wants. Just another sign that Obama is a pussy.
I'm not dismissing the fact that he got the info in the first place. That's a serious problem but if we take his ammunition away from him then the immediate threat is resolved.
- BigLouie
- 12-06-2010, 05:32 PM
- starflash
- 12-06-2010, 11:59 PM
Somebody needs to take that asshole out. What he is doing is a form of terrorism IMO.Couldn't agree more.........
The government is doing shit behind our backs, fine, I get it. I don't like it and if they are I want to know(maybe).
If leaking this shit is really putting Americans in harms way then take him out even if everything gets released. We can regroup after the chaos but pandering to the guy is simply giving him what he wants. Just another sign that Obama is a pussy.
I'm not dismissing the fact that he got the info in the first place. That's a serious problem but if we take his ammunition away from him then the immediate threat is resolved. Originally Posted by boardman
- Jackie S
- 12-07-2010, 07:53 AM
Sooner or later, one of his little "wiki-clones" will release something that the Russians don't like. They have a very unique way of dealing with this sort of thing, and it does not include, "we are going to sue you". Would you want Vladimer Putan pissed at you.
Let's look at the bright side. They just might have a copy of President Obama's birth certificate, from Kenya.
Let's look at the bright side. They just might have a copy of President Obama's birth certificate, from Kenya.
- oilfieldscum
- 12-07-2010, 09:14 AM
That Assange guy is nothing more than a professional computer hacker and all hackers belong in one place.
- LexusLover
- 12-07-2010, 09:27 AM
- Trey
- 12-07-2010, 03:41 PM
You guys still on that birth certificate shit Damn. I mean its only 2 years before you can vote in Palin, relax you guys will win next election. Then we can have a reality star for president I know I can't wait. What did you want Obama to do send out black ops to get the guy. We bull shitted some rape charges on him and he has been arrested.
- JohnnyFarangly
- 12-07-2010, 03:47 PM
Sexual encounters with two Swedish women last August are at the center of the arrest of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. His lawyer calls it a "political stunt" and supporters suspect a government conspiracy to entrap Assange. The two women allege it has nothing to do with leaked files and everything to do with how he treats women.
Assange's lawyers have claimed the accusations stem from a "dispute over consensual but unprotected sex" and say the women only made the claims after finding out about each other's relationships with Assange.
Assange, for his part, said shortly after the allegations became public that he was shocked. "I have been accused of various things in recent years, but nothing so serious as this," he told a Swedish newspaper.
Below is what's known so far about those encounters, based on reporting by London's Daily Mail and the allegations made in a London court on Tuesday by Gemma Lindfield, an attorney acting for Swedish authorities.
Aug. 11: Assange arrives in Stockholm, where he is to be the key speaker at a seminar organized by a group called the Brotherhood Movement.
London's Daily Mail reports his point of contact is a radical feminist who once held a university post of "campus sexual equity officer." The two had never met but earlier agreed that Assange would stay at her apartment, the Mail stated. She planned to be out of town until the day of the seminar.
Aug. 14: The woman, identified by Swedish officials only as Miss A, returns to Stockholm, 24 hours earlier than planned. The two go out for dinner, return to the apartment and have sex during which a condom breaks. She would later tell police that Assange used his body weight to hold her down during sex and that she was a victim of "unlawful coercion."
Aug. 15: Assange delivers his seminar speech and meets another woman who tags along for lunch with friends, the Mail reported, adding that the two then go to a movie where the woman suggests they were "intimate."
That evening, Miss A hosts a party for Assange at her home, afterward reportedly tweeting this to friends: "Sitting outside ... nearly freezing, with the world’s coolest people. It’s pretty amazing!"
Aug. 16: The second woman, identified only as Miss W by Swedish officials, calls Assange and they meet in Stockholm. They go by train to her hometown and to her apartment, where they have sex. According to her testimony to police, Assange wore a condom.
Aug. 17: Miss W later tells police that Assange that morning had unprotected sex with her while she was still asleep.
Aug. 18: Assange is alleged on this day to have "deliberately molested" Miss A "in a way designed to violate her sexual integrity."
Soon after, Miss W contacts Miss A, knowing her from the seminar, and confides that she had unprotected sex with Assange, the Mail reported. Miss A says that she, too, had slept with him and reportedly later phones an acquaintance of Assange to relay to him that she wants him out of her apartment.
Aug. 20: Assange leaves the apartment. The two women go to Stockholm police to seek advice on how to proceed with a complaint by Miss W against Assange, the Mail reported. According to one source, Miss W wanted to know if it was possible to force Assange to undergo an HIV test. Miss A said she was there merely to support Miss W, but she also gives police an account of what had happened between herself and Assange, the Mail reported.
The female interviewing officer concludes that Miss W had been raped and Miss A subject to sexual molestation. A duty prosecuting attorney agrees Assange should be sought on suspicion of rape.
Aug. 21: The chief prosecutor dismisses the rape charge and arrest warrant, saying what occurred were no more than minor offenses.
In the following days, the claimants appeal, and a special prosecutor reopens the case, eventually reissuing the arrest warrant.
By now the press had gotten hold of the story. Miss A spoke to a Swedish newspaper, saying: "In both cases, the sex had been consensual from the start but had eventually turned into abuse."
"The accusations were not set up by the Pentagon or anybody else," she added. "The responsibility for what happened to me and the other girl lies with a man with a twisted view of women, who has a problem accepting the word 'no.' "
Assange's lawyers have claimed the accusations stem from a "dispute over consensual but unprotected sex" and say the women only made the claims after finding out about each other's relationships with Assange.
Assange, for his part, said shortly after the allegations became public that he was shocked. "I have been accused of various things in recent years, but nothing so serious as this," he told a Swedish newspaper.
Below is what's known so far about those encounters, based on reporting by London's Daily Mail and the allegations made in a London court on Tuesday by Gemma Lindfield, an attorney acting for Swedish authorities.
Aug. 11: Assange arrives in Stockholm, where he is to be the key speaker at a seminar organized by a group called the Brotherhood Movement.
London's Daily Mail reports his point of contact is a radical feminist who once held a university post of "campus sexual equity officer." The two had never met but earlier agreed that Assange would stay at her apartment, the Mail stated. She planned to be out of town until the day of the seminar.
Aug. 14: The woman, identified by Swedish officials only as Miss A, returns to Stockholm, 24 hours earlier than planned. The two go out for dinner, return to the apartment and have sex during which a condom breaks. She would later tell police that Assange used his body weight to hold her down during sex and that she was a victim of "unlawful coercion."
Aug. 15: Assange delivers his seminar speech and meets another woman who tags along for lunch with friends, the Mail reported, adding that the two then go to a movie where the woman suggests they were "intimate."
That evening, Miss A hosts a party for Assange at her home, afterward reportedly tweeting this to friends: "Sitting outside ... nearly freezing, with the world’s coolest people. It’s pretty amazing!"
Aug. 16: The second woman, identified only as Miss W by Swedish officials, calls Assange and they meet in Stockholm. They go by train to her hometown and to her apartment, where they have sex. According to her testimony to police, Assange wore a condom.
Aug. 17: Miss W later tells police that Assange that morning had unprotected sex with her while she was still asleep.
Aug. 18: Assange is alleged on this day to have "deliberately molested" Miss A "in a way designed to violate her sexual integrity."
Soon after, Miss W contacts Miss A, knowing her from the seminar, and confides that she had unprotected sex with Assange, the Mail reported. Miss A says that she, too, had slept with him and reportedly later phones an acquaintance of Assange to relay to him that she wants him out of her apartment.
Aug. 20: Assange leaves the apartment. The two women go to Stockholm police to seek advice on how to proceed with a complaint by Miss W against Assange, the Mail reported. According to one source, Miss W wanted to know if it was possible to force Assange to undergo an HIV test. Miss A said she was there merely to support Miss W, but she also gives police an account of what had happened between herself and Assange, the Mail reported.
The female interviewing officer concludes that Miss W had been raped and Miss A subject to sexual molestation. A duty prosecuting attorney agrees Assange should be sought on suspicion of rape.
Aug. 21: The chief prosecutor dismisses the rape charge and arrest warrant, saying what occurred were no more than minor offenses.
In the following days, the claimants appeal, and a special prosecutor reopens the case, eventually reissuing the arrest warrant.
By now the press had gotten hold of the story. Miss A spoke to a Swedish newspaper, saying: "In both cases, the sex had been consensual from the start but had eventually turned into abuse."
"The accusations were not set up by the Pentagon or anybody else," she added. "The responsibility for what happened to me and the other girl lies with a man with a twisted view of women, who has a problem accepting the word 'no.' "
- JohnnyFarangly
- 12-07-2010, 03:49 PM
By Ron Paul December 7, 2010
We may never know the whole story behind the recent publication of sensitive U.S. government documents by the WikiLeaks organization, but we certainly can draw some important conclusions from the reaction of so many in government and media.
At its core, the WikiLeaks controversy serves as a diversion from the real issue of what our foreign policy should be. But the mainstream media, along with neoconservatives from both political parties, insists on asking the wrong question. When presented with embarrassing disclosures about U.S. spying and meddling, the policy that requires so much spying and meddling is not questioned. Instead, the media focuses on how so much sensitive information could have been leaked, or how authorities might prosecute the publishers of such information.
No one questions the status quo or suggests a wholesale rethinking of our foreign policy. No one suggests that the White House or the State Department should be embarrassed that the U.S. engages in spying and meddling. The only embarrassment is that it was made public. This allows ordinary people to actually know and talk about what the government does. But state secrecy is anathema to a free society. Why exactly should Americans be prevented from knowing what their government is doing in their name?
In a free society, we are supposed to know the truth. In a society where truth becomes treason, however, we are in big trouble. The truth is that our foreign spying, meddling, and outright military intervention in the post-World War II era has made us less secure, not more. And we have lost countless lives and spent trillions of dollars for our trouble. Too often “official” government lies have provided justification for endless, illegal wars and hundreds of thousands of resulting deaths and casualties.
Take the recent hostilities in Korea as only one example. More than 50 years after the end of the Korean War, American taxpayers continue to spend billions for the U.S. military to defend a modern and wealthy South Korea. The continued presence of the U.S. military places American lives between the two factions. The U.S. presence only serves to prolong the conflict, further drain our empty treasury, and place our military at risk.
The neoconservative ethos, steeped in the teaching of Leo Strauss, cannot abide an America where individuals simply pursue their own happy, peaceful, prosperous lives. It cannot abide an America where society centers around family, religion, or civic and social institutions rather than an all-powerful central state. There is always an enemy to slay, whether communist or terrorist. In the neoconservative vision, a constant state of alarm must be fostered among the people to keep them focused on something greater than themselves – namely their great protector, the state. This is why the neoconservative reaction to the WikiLeaks revelations is so predictable: “See, we told you the world was a dangerous place,” goes the story. They claim we must prosecute – or even assassinate – those responsible for publishing the leaks. And we must redouble our efforts to police the world by spying and meddling better, with no more leaks.
We should view the WikiLeaks controversy in the larger context of American foreign policy. Rather than worry about the disclosure of embarrassing secrets, we should focus on our delusional foreign policy. We are kidding ourselves when we believe spying, intrigue, and outright military intervention can maintain our international status as a superpower while our domestic economy crumbles in an orgy of debt and monetary debasement.
- Jackie S
- 12-07-2010, 04:48 PM
Trey, I certainly do not want Sarah Palin to be elected President, because she is no more qualified for the job than President Obama.
The main reason I like Sarah Palin is she is so damned good to look at. Aside from that, let her do what she does best; raise money, get the conservatives to the polls, and best of all, aggravate the heck out of the Democrats.
The main reason I like Sarah Palin is she is so damned good to look at. Aside from that, let her do what she does best; raise money, get the conservatives to the polls, and best of all, aggravate the heck out of the Democrats.
- Trey
- 12-07-2010, 05:25 PM
Honestly can't stand either side. You either vote for pussy or Dick seems like. One rolls over and gets fucked (democrats) the other runs around looking who to fuck over next. To much agenda on either side, they can't even compromise without one saying I won instead of we worked it out.
- gnadfly
- 12-07-2010, 05:53 PM
You guys still on that birth certificate shit Damn. I mean its only 2 years before you can vote in Palin, relax you guys will win next election. Then we can have a reality star for president I know I can't wait. What did you want Obama to do send out black ops to get the guy. We bull shitted some rape charges on him and he has been arrested. Originally Posted by trey
So what do you think is in the file? BTW, I'm fixated on chocolate chip cookie recipes. You seem to be fixated on remorse.
- jasmin
- 12-07-2010, 06:26 PM
- RebeccaRothko
- 12-07-2010, 07:31 PM
Huh? http://gawker.com/5708417/us-will-br...ss-freedom-day
Assange didn't do any hacking, people with access gave Wikileaks this information. Whatever his past is that should not detract from what is being exposed, most of it isn't that great, I would really like to see the good shit. What is on Wikileaks should not be criminal, I wish there were more people willing to do some real journalism. Even the papers that Wikileaks gave a heads up to right before the first big leak have lost their balls and backbones, they felt safer to hide behind Assange and Wikileaks, that's pretty fucking sad for every US citizen.
Not that the DailyMail is the best source
http://microblogbuzz.com/redirect/88328534
Assange didn't do any hacking, people with access gave Wikileaks this information. Whatever his past is that should not detract from what is being exposed, most of it isn't that great, I would really like to see the good shit. What is on Wikileaks should not be criminal, I wish there were more people willing to do some real journalism. Even the papers that Wikileaks gave a heads up to right before the first big leak have lost their balls and backbones, they felt safer to hide behind Assange and Wikileaks, that's pretty fucking sad for every US citizen.
Not that the DailyMail is the best source
http://microblogbuzz.com/redirect/88328534