Gonad shows again why he should never be seen in polite society

Just can't resist trying to turn the code talker thread into more political sewage.

Good for you gonad. Well done. There isn't anything you wouldn't try to pollute. You don't have enough threads on here that you can throw mud in? I really don't care whether I agreed with your post or not--it was grossly inappropriate. You know that, and you do not care, you decrepit scumbag.

Once more your post shows you have no brains, no sense of respect, no gratitude, and no understanding of normal human beings.

Go have a good laugh and pat yourself on the back. Bravo, asshole.

http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1055406004&post count=17

You're a queer-ass mutha fucka, Old-Twerp. Once again you jumped right over your butt-buddy's comment to assail someone else, Old-Twerp! So your stupid notion as to who polluted what is as fucked up as you, Old-Twerp, you Pollyanna poser. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

More inappropriate filth from IBCondomMan.
Read the thread you piece of crap. Everything was fine for the first 5 posts. Even the Choctaw article you copied was fine—and a nice addition to the topic.

But it was actually YOU with your gratuitous “Here's one for BigTex, in this centennial year of WWI” that started the politicizing. Remember that part? AFTER that Yssup tossed in his comment—AFTER being the operative word.

So should I have ripped BOTH of you? I could have, I thought about it, but I decided it was not egregious enough to call out. But when Gonad posted his piece of shit it was bigger and stunk more than yours, so I decided that one did need to be addressed.

But unlike you—you pathetic waste of oxygen—I tried to avoid dragging that post into the slime that is everything you touch. I started a new thread to address gonad’s post. I intentionally did not put it in the code talker thread. But you, in typical IBAsshole, IBLookAtMe, IBIDon’tGiveADamnAboutTheMarin esISayISupport fashion don’t even have the decency to reply to my post in the same thread I posted in. No, YOU have to feed your ego by polluting the other thread.

Yep. Good Ol’ IB. The human(?) equivalent of a rabid dog. Bravo, IBPieceOfShit.

Chester Nez doesn’t deserve having a disgusting slime like you polluting what was an honorable post by IIFFy.

I'm still trying to figure out why he posted "one for BigTex?"

I suspect he is too senile to remember. Of course we will never know because he will deny he did.

Did what?

Or, "You anti-Christian Old-Twerp, if you would stop drinking four quarts of gin before posting you'd see that your post was the insulting one. I can find at least five articles that support my view. Or i'll at least claim they do. And if I can't i'll rant and rave and make them up god damn it! I'm the great and powerful Oz, you can't challenge ME!" Yes, that kind of sounds like him. And he calls ME sanctimonious.

http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1055406004&post count=17


More inappropriate filth from IBCondomMan.
Read the thread you piece of crap. Everything was fine for the first 5 posts. Even the Choctaw article you copied was fine—and a nice addition to the topic.

But it was actually YOU with your gratuitous “Here's one for BigTex, in this centennial year of WWI” that started the politicizing. Remember that part? AFTER that Yssup tossed in his comment—AFTER being the operative word.

So should I have ripped BOTH of you? I could have, I thought about it, but I decided it was not egregious enough to call out. But when Gonad posted his piece of shit it was bigger and stunk more than yours, so I decided that one did need to be addressed.

But unlike you—you pathetic waste of oxygen—I tried to avoid dragging that post into the slime that is everything you touch. I started a new thread to address gonad’s post. I intentionally did not put it in the code talker thread. But you, in typical IBAsshole, IBLookAtMe, IBIDon’tGiveADamnAboutTheMarin esISayISupport fashion don’t even have the decency to reply to my post in the same thread I posted in. No, YOU have to feed your ego by polluting the other thread.

Yep. Good Ol’ IB. The human(?) equivalent of a rabid dog. Bravo, IBPieceOfShit.

Chester Nez doesn’t deserve having a disgusting slime like you polluting what was an honorable post by IIFFy. Originally Posted by Old-T

That reply was posted in the wrong thread, Old-Twerp; nevertheless, every word aptly still applies to you, Old-Twerp: the Pollyanna poser. You moronically jumped right over a post by your butt-buddy and stupidly and VERY dishonestly claimed someone else was the first to fuck up the thread, Old-Twerp.

I'm still trying to figure out why he posted "one for BigTex?" Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Hasa diga, you lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

I suspect he is too senile to remember. Of course we will never know because he will deny he did. Originally Posted by Old-T

There was no "politicizing" or animus in the post directed towards BigTex as you stupidly claim, Old-Twerp. BigTex once posted that his forebears belonged to one of five tribes -- and that tribe wasn't the Navajo. That post you lyingly declaim as politicizing, Old-Twerp, was an honest "thank you" to both the Navajo and the Choctaw for their service despite your lying stupid claim that it was political, Old-Twerp.

Did what?

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Hasa diga, you lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

Poor IB

Poor IB

Originally Posted by JCM800

So you're "sorry", 1-800-JCM-DATO: Ekim the Inbred Chimp's soiled breechclout? Everyone knows that, 1-800-JCM-DATO: Ekim the Inbred Chimp's soiled breechclout!

Enjoy, IBIdiot

That reply was posted in the wrong thread, Old-Twerp; nevertheless, every word aptly still applies to you, Old-Twerp: the Pollyanna poser. You moronically jumped right over a post by your butt-buddy and stupidly and VERY dishonestly claimed someone else was the first to fuck up the thread, Old-Twerp.

There was no "politicizing" or animus in the post directed towards BigTex as you stupidly claim, Old-Twerp. BigTex once posted that his forebears belonged to one of five tribes -- and that tribe wasn't the Navajo. That post you lyingly declaim as politicizing, Old-Twerp, was an honest "thank you" to both the Navajo and the Choctaw for their service despite your lying stupid claim that it was political, Old-Twerp. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

That sounds plausible. I will take you at your word, in which case I owe you an apology for my comment about your Choctaw post. Apology given. Since I suspect many did not know the connection between BigTex and native heritage it might have been good to be clearer, and thus avoid this.

My comment about gonad's post still stands.

That is a pretty half assed apology. I"m sorry but it's your fault for not being clearer. Seriously. Of course you give Sup a complete pass for acting like an ass. Way to go.

That is a pretty half assed apology.
Really? I thought it was pretty direct, sincere, unambiguous, and without reservation. "I owe you an apology for my comment about your Choctaw post. Apology given." It may well be the best apology on this board in the past thousand posts (not because it is a great apology, but because apologies happen so infrequently here it may be the ONLY apology in the last thousand posts).

I"m sorry but it's your fault for not being clearer.
That is very laughable--my initial insult to IB was very clear. What part of it did you not understand? I may have retracted it, but not because it wasn't clear. As to IB's post, I had no influence on his post so how was I to make it clearer? I refuse to apologize that I did not know somewhere in the history of this board BigTex said he had NA blood. Rhetorical question: did YOU remember it?

Seriously. Of course you give Sup a complete pass for acting like an ass. Way to go.
The fact that you or IB don't like what Y said is not my problem--nor my responsibility to speak up about. I thought you "real conservatives" were all about personal responsibility? Now you want me to fight your battles for you? Originally Posted by Budman

.

That sounds plausible. I will take you at your word, in which case I owe you an apology for my comment about your Choctaw post. Apology given. Since I suspect many did not know the connection between BigTex and native heritage it might have been good to be clearer, and thus avoid this.

My comment about gonad's post still stands. Originally Posted by Old-T

Hell, I don't even recall the exchange you are speaking of. In any event, if I said something to offend you Old-T, I apologize. It wasn't intentional!

Hell, I don't even recall the exchange you are speaking of. In any event, if I said something to offend you Old-T, I apologize. It wasn't intentional! Originally Posted by bigtex

Tex, no you did not. There was some confusion about this post by IB:
http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1055400585&postcount=6
and his comment dedicating it to you.

Since it was out of any previous context I took it as a confusing jab at you. IB explained rather reasonably that it was not intended as a jab, so then I apologized to IB.

That is about the extent of it. Sorry for the confusion.