I am going to post this because some fools will think the wrong thing. Obama has the emotional age of an adolescent boy. He has to have his way, he has to be heard, he can't take criticism, if confronted with reality he wants to take his blocks and go home, he wants to make people "pay" for getting in his face. They should just put Obama in short knee britches and give him a tricycle to get around on. Seriously, Obama has surrounded himself with strong women (Michelle and Valerie Jarrett to name two) to replace his absent mother. Considering how easy Ann gave up her son it is lucky that abortion laws did not allow Ann Dunham easier access.
Yes, there is a danger of stupid people taking the term Boy President differently that I mean it. Maybe they haven't read about Harry Potter, the Boy Wizard. Of course if I use the term "welfare queen" they will think a black woman with lacquered nails rather than the reality of a white woman and she has a cigarette and a beer (I think that is a nice touch). What they think reveals much about them.
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Oooooh, I get it. You must think yourself mighty clever.
You manage to work in the word "boy" when talking about Obama. But before folks can call you on your racism, you think you can disarm them in advance by accusing THEM of not understanding your true meaning. You then make some BS reference to Harry Potter, Boy Wizard - as if we are required to accept that at face value.
Here is the scoop, asshole. We aren't required to buy your bullshit cover story.
Obviously, you knew before you posted that the phrase "Boy President" would be a loaded term.
But did you drop it in favor of "Childish President"? No.
Did you drop it in favor of "Adolescent President"? No.
Did you drop it in favor of "Crybaby President" or "Petulant President" or "Bratty President"? No, no and no.
You made your little racist point, but didn't have the guts to stand behind it. Coward.
We see through your cover story because we are not as stupid as you are.
