disputing cutepapi review

review -
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1926413




- im disputing this review because first the "cutepapi" falsely identified himself under another username . ( under the review that i read he states to other handlers that he did lie to me and gave me the wrong username )

secondly, extremely rude from the moment i met him.
wanted full uncovered service for a QV and then got angry when i didnt agree but plans were clearly made before hand .

this review is effecting me in a harsh way , when the review is false and he states that he had to lie to me to even be able to come and see me, because his other reviews arent good looking and i would never meet with anyone who talks about and does the things he does during appointments.


email- xoxomarie100@gmail.com

What handle did he give you?

Not that I'm taking his side, and the entire board knows he has a bad rep for questionable behavior, but...

Marie, why did you wait so long to dispute this? The review was posted 12/24/16. The fact that it's been affecting your business recently is incidental to arguing the truthfulness of the encounter to begin with. Sorry, hon, not to harangue you, but the delay brings your motive into doubt, right or wrong.

Like Brooke said, what username did he contact you by? Having two ECCIE accounts is a violation of core guidelines that could send him on bancation, but deceiving you about having a different handle for screening purposes, false pretenses, is not actually against the rules and, alas, has no bearing on his review. (Sucks, but there it is.)

How did you screen him? Did he PM you through ECCIE? If it turns out that he indeed does have multiple handles, away he may go, for a brief while, anyway. If you didn't screen him (which he says you didn't in the review comments and so didn't have to lie about who he really was), well, you have little to stand on.

Again, screening is vital, ladies, not only for safety, but for verification of accusations later if things go south!

What handle did he give you? Originally Posted by Brooke Wilde

right?

there was an alert about a impostor using the "gtoman" handle trying to see providers.

Sorry, hon, not to harangue you, but the delay brings your motive into doubt, right or wrong. Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

the motive is to clear her name. based on 'papi's past of tricking girls into unwanted bareback sechs and recording sessions...I tend to believe her.

right?

there was an alert about a impostor using the "gtoman" handle trying to see providers.




the motive is to clear her name. based on 'papi's past of tricking girls into unwanted bareback sechs and recording sessions...I tend to believe her. Originally Posted by ognob

Oh, I quite agree, and sincerely hope she can establish her side of the story incontrovertibly, but I'm playing devil's advocate here, and some may ponder her veracity because of her failure to yell loudly at the time of the review and lack of provable data if she didn't screen and verify his identity through the ECCIE message system.

We need that handle!

Don't worry sweetie a No from him makes you a YES for most of the rest of us.

Isn't a little slow for all providers right now? Or am I wrong?

.....
- im disputing this review because first the "cutepapi" falsely identified himself under another username . ( under the review that i read he states to other handlers that he did lie to me and gave me the wrong username )
..... Originally Posted by Marie.

well.....his side:

She did no screening lol. Didn't lie Originally Posted by the cute papi

Don't worry sweety. We'd be worried if he gave you a yes.

What handle did he give you? Originally Posted by Brooke Wilde

wakeup?

Hotboyz?

Rosenberg Joe?

I'm playing devil's advocate here Originally Posted by Fancyinheels

I am suprised and shocked by you Fancy. You know good and well papi is a predator. How could you come now and play advocate for him.

Marie - Fancy is right about the handle. YOU MUST post that here and soon. Pr if you simply did not screen as he asserts just own up to it. Everyone here knows what kind of creature he is. However, we do not know you and you need to support your claim. For you.

He said he was Wolf Whistle et al. She was only told not to see the Cute Papi. She didn't get the memo about WW, unfortunately.

ahhh shit.... not again....!!


What was his other handle name Marie...........??









.

That guy is a cancer. You ladies dont help each other if you dont call out fals handles by name. This leaves the next lady ready to be suckered by that mother fucker again. You also have a chance to at least have his second name banned.

I am suprised and shocked by you Fancy. You know good and well papi is a predator. How could you come now and play advocate for him.

Marie - Fancy is right about the handle. YOU MUST post that here and soon. Pr if you simply did not screen as he asserts just own up to it. Everyone here knows what kind of creature he is. However, we do not know you and you need to support your claim. For you. Originally Posted by Mythos

As I stated, I was not defending the guy, believe me, and I feel bad for the lass. The point that I was trying to hammer home with a sledge is that providers MUST be more discerning, cautious, and proactive, not only in their screening, but in the way that they are perceived by the board and perspective clients. Ladies have got to get their A game together, especially with the confusion and heat we may see over the next couple of months from the influx of new members (both hussies and hussy hunters) departing the defunct Backpage escort sections, and in view of the microscopic scrutiny on the Houston Hobby scene by media and LE that will be caused by the Superbowl.

If someone mounts a defense, they have to back it up with hard evidence. Otherwise it's only another case of he said/she said with no definitive outcome.

However, just starting the thread calls attention to his antics and serves as another warning, so we can sympathize and thank Marie for that.