God Damn It!
- IIFFOFRDB
- 08-08-2014, 06:42 PM
- IIFFOFRDB
- 08-08-2014, 06:51 PM
Obama’s Treachery and Republican Silence
When will they stop pretending this is a normal presidency?
AUGUST 8, 2014 12:00 PM
By David Horowitz
Barack Obama deliberately set out to lose the war in Iraq, and he did. He defied the advice of his joint chiefs of staff to secure America’s formidable military presence and keep 20,000 troops in country, and left Iraq to its own devices and the tender mercies of Iran. In doing so, he betrayed every American and Iraqi who gave his life to create a free Iraq and keep it out of the clutches of the terrorists.
Iraq is now a war zone dominated by the terrorist forces of the Islamic State, whose rise Obama’s policies fostered. Both his secretaries of state praised the animal Bashar Assad as a “reformer” and a man of “peace,” helping him to thwart his domestic opposition. The Islamic State was born out of the Syrian chaos that ensued.
Far worse was Obama’s open support for America’s mortal enemy, the Muslim Brotherhood, spawner of al-Qaeda and Hamas. During the “Arab Spring,” Obama essentially put America’s weight behind the legitimization of this murderous organization that had been outlawed for 40 years for its assassinations and conspiracies against the Egyptian regime. Secretary of State Clinton gave totally unfounded assurances to the world that the Brotherhood was ready to become part of the democratic process and give up its 90-year holy war against infidels, Jews in particular but also — and explicitly — America. During the Brotherhood’s brief tenure as the government in Egypt Obama gave these genocidal zealots more than a billion dollars in American aid and F-16 fighter-bombers that could easily reach Israel’s major population centers, which for 60 years the Brotherhood had sworn to destroy.
By his feckless interventions in the Middle East, and his tacit support for the chief organization of Islam’s terror war against the West, Obama has set the Middle East on fire. All the violence in the crescent from Gaza to Iraq, including Hamas’s genocidal war against Israel, has been encouraged by Obama’s support for the Brotherhood and hostility toward the Jewish state.
Characteristic of this encouragement was his illegal intervention in Libya, which violated every principle that Obama and the Democrats invoked to attack President Bush and undermine America’s war against the Saddam regime and the terrorists in Iraq. Thanks to Obama, Libya is now in the hands of the terrorists and thousands of Libyans are fleeing to Tunisia and Egypt. Thanks to Obama, the Christian communities of Iraq, which date back to the time of Christ, are being slaughtered.
Because of Obama’s aversion to America’s role as a keeper of international peace, the tyrant Putin has been able to swallow Crimea and threaten the rest of Ukraine. Since his election in 2009, Obama’s policies have been responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of people and will result in the deaths of tens of thousands more. Thanks to his efforts to destroy America’s borders, Americans may be included in this grim toll. Certainly, Americans are now threatened by terrorists as never before.
Where is the Republican opposition? Why are Republicans still treating Obama as though his were a normal presidency and not a national disgrace? Why are there no indictments of Obama for the carnage he has enabled?
There is one foreign policy area where Republicans have shown some fight: Benghazi. But the fight here has been over an inquiry — important in its own right, but not a political challenge to Obama’s efforts to sabotage and degrade the country he is supposed to lead.
We know the basic facts. Obama’s team was trying to monitor and recapture the weapons we had helped supply to Islamist militias in Libya. That was Ambassador Stevens’s mission. No security was provided because Stevens’s mission had to be secret and plausibly deniable in the middle of an election in which Obama was running on the cynical lie that the war on terror had been won. During the battle waged by American heroes against the terrorists’ assault in Benghazi, the president and his secretary of state went A.W.O.L. and left these brave Americans to die. Instead of honoring them and hunting down their killers, Obama then took off for a fundraiser in Las Vegas. This was surely the most shameful individual act by a president in the history of the White House.
Having abandoned these American heroes and their families, Obama and his minions then lied to the American people about the terrorist attack and used it as an occasion to defend the Prophet Mohammed in a U.N. address to the world. This series of acts showed Obama’s contempt for the American military, contempt for the American people, and sympathy for America’s enemies, an attitude that has been revealed over and over again.
When will Republicans gather the courage to start speaking truth to power?
http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...david-horowitz
.
When will they stop pretending this is a normal presidency?
AUGUST 8, 2014 12:00 PM
By David Horowitz
Barack Obama deliberately set out to lose the war in Iraq, and he did. He defied the advice of his joint chiefs of staff to secure America’s formidable military presence and keep 20,000 troops in country, and left Iraq to its own devices and the tender mercies of Iran. In doing so, he betrayed every American and Iraqi who gave his life to create a free Iraq and keep it out of the clutches of the terrorists.
Iraq is now a war zone dominated by the terrorist forces of the Islamic State, whose rise Obama’s policies fostered. Both his secretaries of state praised the animal Bashar Assad as a “reformer” and a man of “peace,” helping him to thwart his domestic opposition. The Islamic State was born out of the Syrian chaos that ensued.
Far worse was Obama’s open support for America’s mortal enemy, the Muslim Brotherhood, spawner of al-Qaeda and Hamas. During the “Arab Spring,” Obama essentially put America’s weight behind the legitimization of this murderous organization that had been outlawed for 40 years for its assassinations and conspiracies against the Egyptian regime. Secretary of State Clinton gave totally unfounded assurances to the world that the Brotherhood was ready to become part of the democratic process and give up its 90-year holy war against infidels, Jews in particular but also — and explicitly — America. During the Brotherhood’s brief tenure as the government in Egypt Obama gave these genocidal zealots more than a billion dollars in American aid and F-16 fighter-bombers that could easily reach Israel’s major population centers, which for 60 years the Brotherhood had sworn to destroy.
By his feckless interventions in the Middle East, and his tacit support for the chief organization of Islam’s terror war against the West, Obama has set the Middle East on fire. All the violence in the crescent from Gaza to Iraq, including Hamas’s genocidal war against Israel, has been encouraged by Obama’s support for the Brotherhood and hostility toward the Jewish state.
Characteristic of this encouragement was his illegal intervention in Libya, which violated every principle that Obama and the Democrats invoked to attack President Bush and undermine America’s war against the Saddam regime and the terrorists in Iraq. Thanks to Obama, Libya is now in the hands of the terrorists and thousands of Libyans are fleeing to Tunisia and Egypt. Thanks to Obama, the Christian communities of Iraq, which date back to the time of Christ, are being slaughtered.
Because of Obama’s aversion to America’s role as a keeper of international peace, the tyrant Putin has been able to swallow Crimea and threaten the rest of Ukraine. Since his election in 2009, Obama’s policies have been responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of people and will result in the deaths of tens of thousands more. Thanks to his efforts to destroy America’s borders, Americans may be included in this grim toll. Certainly, Americans are now threatened by terrorists as never before.
Where is the Republican opposition? Why are Republicans still treating Obama as though his were a normal presidency and not a national disgrace? Why are there no indictments of Obama for the carnage he has enabled?
There is one foreign policy area where Republicans have shown some fight: Benghazi. But the fight here has been over an inquiry — important in its own right, but not a political challenge to Obama’s efforts to sabotage and degrade the country he is supposed to lead.
We know the basic facts. Obama’s team was trying to monitor and recapture the weapons we had helped supply to Islamist militias in Libya. That was Ambassador Stevens’s mission. No security was provided because Stevens’s mission had to be secret and plausibly deniable in the middle of an election in which Obama was running on the cynical lie that the war on terror had been won. During the battle waged by American heroes against the terrorists’ assault in Benghazi, the president and his secretary of state went A.W.O.L. and left these brave Americans to die. Instead of honoring them and hunting down their killers, Obama then took off for a fundraiser in Las Vegas. This was surely the most shameful individual act by a president in the history of the White House.
Having abandoned these American heroes and their families, Obama and his minions then lied to the American people about the terrorist attack and used it as an occasion to defend the Prophet Mohammed in a U.N. address to the world. This series of acts showed Obama’s contempt for the American military, contempt for the American people, and sympathy for America’s enemies, an attitude that has been revealed over and over again.
When will Republicans gather the courage to start speaking truth to power?
http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...david-horowitz
.
- Jackie S
- 08-08-2014, 10:46 PM
Pretty damned good speech.
We now live in a Country where the term "vote for a living" has become a reality. We live in a Country where the creed of polititians is, "Party first, Country second". We live in a Country where one of the greatest phrases ever uttered by a President, "ask not what your Country can do for you, but what you can do for your a country", has been bastardized by his own Political Party to the extent that is a mockery.
And it still amazes me that we have seemingly intelligent people who can't see past the Demogogue's shallow persona and empty ideas.
We now live in a Country where the term "vote for a living" has become a reality. We live in a Country where the creed of polititians is, "Party first, Country second". We live in a Country where one of the greatest phrases ever uttered by a President, "ask not what your Country can do for you, but what you can do for your a country", has been bastardized by his own Political Party to the extent that is a mockery.
And it still amazes me that we have seemingly intelligent people who can't see past the Demogogue's shallow persona and empty ideas.
- Mr MojoRisin
- 08-08-2014, 11:05 PM
Pretty damned good speech.Exactly, You're a pretty smart guy.
We now live in a Country where the term "vote for a living" has become a reality. We live in a Country where the creed of polititians is, "Party first, Country second". We live in a Country where one of the greatest phrases ever uttered by a President, "ask not what your Country can do for you, but what you can do for your a country", has been bastardized by his own Political Party to the extent that is a mockery.
And it still amazes me that we have seemingly intelligent people who can't see past the Demogogue's shallow persona and empty ideas. Originally Posted by Jackie S
Jim
- IIFFOFRDB
- 08-09-2014, 11:56 PM
- Yssup Rider
- 08-10-2014, 12:12 AM
SNICK.
- IIFFOFRDB
- 08-10-2014, 12:15 AM
- Yssup Rider
- 08-10-2014, 01:04 AM
Pity you don't have a clue what's going on in the world, Simple Jerk!
- IIFFOFRDB
- 08-11-2014, 05:46 PM
- IIFFOFRDB
- 08-11-2014, 05:56 PM
Snicks Dicks Boy SUCKS... watch this and get a CLUE
- Old-T
- 08-11-2014, 06:13 PM
You want to change it? Put up an ELECTABLE sane candidate.
But no, the nuts are talking T. Cruz. What a scary, delusional option that is. The last thing we need is a third straight newbie in the WH.
But no, the nuts are talking T. Cruz. What a scary, delusional option that is. The last thing we need is a third straight newbie in the WH.
- IIFFOFRDB
- 08-11-2014, 06:17 PM
- IIFFOFRDB
- 08-11-2014, 06:22 PM
You want to change it? Put up an ELECTABLE sane candidate.
But no, the nuts are talking T. Cruz. What a scary, delusional option that is. The last thing we need is a third straight newbie in the WH. Originally Posted by Old-T
Are you talking about the "nuts" who elected a president who had never had a job prior to moving in the white house? or just "us" other nuts?
- Guest040616
- 08-11-2014, 07:14 PM
a president who had never had a job prior to moving in the White House? Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDBReally, Obama "never had a job?"
How do you explain the following excerpt from Wikipedia?
Obama entered Harvard Law School in the Fall of 1988. He was selected as an editor of the Harvard Law Review at the end of his first year, president of the journal in his second year, and research assistant to the constitutional scholar Laurence Tribe while at Harvard for two years. During his summers, he returned to Chicago, where he worked as an associate at the law firms of Sidley Austin in 1989 and Hopkins & Sutter in 1990. After graduating with a J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard in 1991, he returned to Chicago. Obama's election as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review gained national media attention and led to a publishing contract and advance for a book about race relations, which evolved into a personal memoir. The manuscript was published in mid-1995 as Dreams from My Father.
University of Chicago Law School and civil rights attorney
In 1991, Obama accepted a two-year position as Visiting Law and Government Fellow at the University of Chicago Law School to work on his first book. He then taught at the University of Chicago Law School for twelve years—as a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996, and as a Senior Lecturer from 1996 to 2004—teaching constitutional law.
From April to October 1992, Obama directed Illinois's Project Vote, a voter registration campaign with ten staffers and seven hundred volunteer registrars; it achieved its goal of registering 150,000 of 400,000 unregistered African Americans in the state, leading Crain's Chicago Business to name Obama to its 1993 list of "40 under Forty" powers to be.
He joined Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland, a 13-attorney law firm specializing in civil rights litigation and neighborhood economic development, where he was an associate for three years from 1993 to 1996, then of counsel from 1996 to 2004. His law license became inactive in 2007.
From 1994 to 2002, Obama served on the boards of directors of the Woods Fund of Chicago, which in 1985 had been the first foundation to fund the Developing Communities Project; and of the Joyce Foundation. He served on the board of directors of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge from 1995 to 2002, as founding president and chairman of the board of directors from 1995 to 1999.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama
Additionally, Obama served as an Illinois State Senator from 1997-2004 and a Unites States Senator from 2004-2008.
Perhaps Hanoi COG's ATF "Sweet Ass" IIFFY has been spending too much time watching FAUX News!
- Old-T
- 08-11-2014, 07:56 PM
Are you talking about the "nuts" who elected a president who had never had a job prior to moving in the white house? or just "us" other nuts? Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDBNo, the nuts who have made the Rep party a collection of Thumpers who really would feel more at home with Islamic law than they admit. And who lost (twice) to a very marginally qualified Obama.