Washington Has Been Lucrative for Some on Biden's Team

The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
well who didn't see this "establishment" swamp thing coming? and this is the NY Times .. YR .. call that fake news!


BAHHAAAHHAAA




Washington Has Been Lucrative for Some on Biden's Team

https://www.yahoo.com/news/washingto...151642546.html


Kenneth P. Vogel and Eric LiptonSat, January 2, 2021, 9:16 AM CST




Antony Blinken, President-elect Joe Biden's Secretary of State nominee, in Wilmington, Del., Nov. 24, 2020. (Anna Moneymaker/The New York Times)




WASHINGTON — President-elect Joe Biden’s choice for Treasury secretary, Janet L. Yellen, collected more than $7 million in speaking fees over the past two years from major corporations and Wall Street banks that have a keen interest in the financial policies she will oversee after her expected confirmation to lead the Treasury Department.


Yellen’s paid speaking appearances — which included $992,000 from investment bank Citi for nine appearances — were among the lucrative payments from a range of Wall Street, Big Tech and corporate interests to three prominent prospective members of the incoming Biden administration.


The payments, revealed in disclosure statements covering the previous two years and released on New Year’s Eve, have caused consternation among progressive activists concerned about the influence of special interests around Biden, who they see as part of a Democratic establishment that has not sufficiently embraced liberal priorities.




Biden’s choice for secretary of state, Antony J. Blinken, was paid nearly $1.2 million by a consulting firm he helped found, WestExec Advisors, where he advised a range of corporations including Facebook, Boeing, private equity giant Blackstone and asset management company Lazard.


Biden’s choice for director of national intelligence, Avril Haines, was paid $180,000 to consult for data-mining company Palantir, which has raised liberal hackles for providing data and surveillance services to law enforcement, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.


Along with their disclosure statements, Yellen, Blinken and Haines each filed ethics agreements pledging to avoid involvement in specific matters that could affect any holding they still own, or with which they had worked in the past year, unless they receive a written waiver from ethics officials.


The three may have to extend the conflict of interest window beyond a year if Biden enacts an expected ethics policy barring officials in his administration from participating for two years in policies that could affect their former business interests.


Yellen and Blinken also indicated they would divest their interests in companies, including stock owned by Yellen in major corporations such as AT&T, ConocoPhillips, Dow, Pfizer and Raytheon. Blinken said he would sell his stake in WestExec Advisors as well as a venture capital firm linked to it.


Blinken indicated in his disclosure filing that those stakes are worth a total of $1.5 million to $6 million.


David Segal, the executive director of the progressive group Demand Progress, said that he still had concerns even though the officials had pledged to abide by conflict of interest rules.


“There are almost too many corporate clients to count who have relationships to the respective ambits these designees would steward if confirmed,” he said, adding that “this is an unfortunate circumstance,” particularly as Biden strives to strike a difference between his administration and President Donald Trump’s.


In the Trump administration, representatives from corporate America and Wall Street held prominent posts, and conflicts of interest abounded.


The filings by Biden’s team offer another glimpse of Washington’s longtime revolving door. Officials whose parties have lost power monetize their insider expertise and connections in the private sector, then head back into government when their party retakes the White House.


Yellen, a former Federal Reserve chair, started giving paid speeches in February 2018, which was within a year of the conclusion of her term at the Fed. She was also a consultant to Magellan Financial Group Ltd., an Australia-based investment fund manager, which paid her $125,000.


Haines left her position as deputy national security adviser to President Barack Obama at the end of his term in 2017, and within about six months she was working as a consultant for Palantir. When Haines joined Biden’s transition team over the summer, a spokesperson sought to distance her from Palantir’s data collection and surveillance, saying that the vast majority of her work for the company was related to diversity and inclusion.


The biggest share of Haines’ income came from Columbia University, which paid her more than $440,000 to help run an international research project and to lecture at the university’s law school. She also was paid $150,000 to consult for the applied physics lab at Johns Hopkins University, and nearly $55,000 to consult and make introductions for WestExec Advisors, the firm Blinken helped found.


Blinken, who served as deputy secretary of state in the Obama administration, formed WestExec Advisors about eight months after he left office with three other Obama administration officials.


The firm, which takes its name from the small street that runs between the West Wing of the White House and the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, was hired by clients looking for advice in navigating the federal government. The firm also paired with venture capital funds that helped companies it advised expand to take on federal contracts or other new work.


Blinken’s disclosure forms show that he worked with 17 WestExec clients, including Microsoft, Uber, AT&T, FedEx, LinkedIn, Japanese conglomerate SoftBank, pharmaceutical company Gilead Sciences and McKinsey & Co., a global consulting firm.


WestExec said in a statement after Blinken emerged as the likely secretary of state pick that he helped business leaders “make the best decisions in a complex and volatile international landscape.”


Blinken also publicly defended tech companies, while Facebook was a client of WestExec. When tech companies came under fire for failing to adequately fight disinformation during the 2016 election — including Facebook posts that were part of a Russian effort to boost Trump’s presidential campaign — Blinken said the blame should be directed primarily at Russia.


Tech platforms “have to do better to defend against malicious actors, but let’s not lose sight of the forest for the trees: The problem is Russia and other actors who use our openness against us, not the platforms,” Blinken said in an interview with Fast Company published in October 2017. “The biggest mistake we can make is to get into a circular firing squad with government and the tech companies,” Blinken told the publication, which identified him as an adviser to both Facebook and Alphabet, the parent company of Google.


José Castañeda, a Google spokesperson, said that the company hired WestExec for one month in 2018 to provide advice on tech policy, but added that the advice was “provided by others in the firm, not by Mr. Blinken.”


In 2009, Obama prohibited all of his appointees from participating for two years in “any particular matter” as a government official that “directly and substantially” related to a former employer or former client, including a federal regulation that might affect the former client.


Biden has not yet released details on what type of restrictions he will impose on his political appointees.
adav8s28's Avatar
Washington was not profitable for the Trump children? The Trump children worked for free? I don't think so.
winn dixie's Avatar
Washington was not profitable for the Trump children? The Trump children worked for free? I don't think so. Originally Posted by adav8s28
Washington has already been very profitable for hunter
eccieuser9500's Avatar

He's been at it a long time. It's time a Californian puts a spin on Washington. Is Barack Obama really the president? Is Kamala really the president? Are you just mad that it isn't really going to be someone with only three letters in their name? Like President Jimmy, President Joe.

Some weird name that isn't WASPy? He's just Joe from the neighborhood. Is he really the president? Or just a conduit?

Cum aaahhhnnn Georgia! Cali needs a new pair of shoes!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V6JQsRIz8aI


I stopped watching this series after eight episodes. It sucks. Gave me a sense of the East Coast/D.C. area small-state political feel. Again, Joe's been at it for a fuckin' long time. You make friends. You lose friends. You keep some friends. Some friends you can't divorce. Along the way, some friends make capital. Monetary or political. Corporate Democrats need to go! I'll keep saying it.















We have to get used to it.

Or do we? Quiet Riot!
eccieuser9500's Avatar
Joe From Scranton Didn’t Win Back the Working Class

An economic analysis of the counties that Joe Biden won and lost shows how the two parties are continuing to realign.


https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/05/u...ar-voters.html


This isn’t a new trend. For decades, Democrats have been trading the support of union members for broader backing from the professional classes. And the G.O.P., once the party of white college-educated voters, has increasingly found support among white working-class voters.

Many Democratic primary voters saw Mr. Biden as uniquely positioned to cut into the Republican advantage with the working class. For decades, he’s built his political brand on being a scrappy kid from Scranton, Pa., who became just another guy riding the train to work. The rallying cry of his campaign in the final weeks was: “This election is Scranton versus Park Avenue.”

But Mr. Biden fared worse than Mrs. Clinton in 2016 and Barack Obama in 2012 and 2008 in counties dominated by blue-collar workers.




Who Was Joseph R. Biden, Sr., Joe Biden's Father?


https://www.marieclaire.com/politics...ph-r-biden-sr/


Biden Jr. recounted a story about his father quitting a job that he felt morally opposed to:

"In his autobiography, he tells the story of his father quitting a job as sales manager for an auto dealership because the owner, who liked to reward his employees and customers with silver dollars, decided to amuse himself at the dealership’s Christmas party by spilling out a bucket of silver dollars on the dance floor to watch his workers scramble to scoop up the coins."
Biden Jr. explained that he learned that a job could embody both dignity and respect, instead of simply being a paycheck. In fact, when Biden Jr. became a senator (and after the tragic deaths of his first wife and daughter), “[Biden Sr.] gave up car sales and went into real estate,” according to Biden's younger sister Valerie Biden Owens. “He didn’t want a United States senator to have a used-car salesman for a dad.”
















matchingmole's Avatar
AdChoices Business Insider Biden will kick ass and take names
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Washington was not profitable for the Trump children? The Trump children worked for free? I don't think so. Originally Posted by adav8s28

only one of his children had a position. news reports claim Trump's business is down. so much for the "got elected to make money" theory .. yeah?



He's been at it a long time. It's time a Californian puts a spin on Washington. Is Barack Obama really the president? Is Kamala really the president? Are you just mad that it isn't really going to be someone with only three letters in their name? Like President Jimmy, President Joe.

Some weird name that isn't WASPy? He's just Joe from the neighborhood. Is he really the president? Or just a conduit?

Cum aaahhhnnn Georgia! Cali needs a new pair of shoes!




I stopped watching this series after eight episodes. It sucks. Gave me a sense of the East Coast/D.C. area small-state political feel. Again, Joe's been at it for a fuckin' long time. You make friends. You lose friends. You keep some friends. Some friends you can't divorce. Along the way, some friends make capital. Monetary or political. Corporate Democrats need to go! I'll keep saying it.




We have to get used to it.

Or do we? Quiet Riot! Originally Posted by eccieuser9500



what else does one expect from a socialist? unlike YR at least you admit it. so what is it about being a commie that gets your weenie to stand up? all commie leaders were mass murdering incompetent bastards. what's the attraction??


BAHAHHAAAAA
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
only one of his children had a position. news reports claim Trump's business is down. so much for the "got elected to make money" theory .. yeah?

what else does one expect from a socialist? unlike YR at least you admit it. so what is it about being a commie that gets your weenie to stand up? all commie leaders were mass murdering incompetent bastards. what's the attraction??

BAHAHHAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Eye see that E9500 is getting a sour taste of Biden.

social justice is a thing with them. they're the victims getting justice over their "oppressors".
Yssup Rider's Avatar
AdChoices Business Insider Biden will kick ass and take names
Originally Posted by matchingmole
Yep.

End Trumpism now.
eccieuser9500's Avatar
what else does one expect from a socialist? unlike YR at least you admit it. so what is it about being a commie that gets your weenie to stand up? all commie leaders were mass murdering incompetent bastards. what's the attraction??


BAHAHHAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

The same thing that gets you off knowing that, even in 2018, Chris Rock gets pulled over in his neighborhood. And your mass murdering incompetent "kind" are protected by the law.

















Unique_Carpenter's Avatar
Umm, Waco,

Why do you think this is news?
Business interests getting economic policy preferences due to involvement in politics is more than a few centuries old. Just think of the East India Trading Company and it's impact on world wide trading just a couple centuries ago.
Munchmasterman's Avatar
Are you claiming the trumps haven't made money in Washington? Are you claiming the trump kids haven't benefitted from dad's office? All the kids have jobs that receive benefits/income from trump's businesses.

Business is down doesn't mean no profits or that all businesses are down.

His tax cut alone saved multiple millions a year for him. That's after his pre-legislation claims it wasn't going to be good for him.
There are hundreds of articles about the legal and possibly illegal income. Here are some.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...1be_story.html

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/...nts-money.html

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/don...rties-n1015806

What do we expect from a liar fresh from banning?

More of the same.
Outright lies.
Lies of omission.
Misrepresentations galore.

Welcome back? It's like you never left.

only one of his children had a position. news reports claim Trump's business is down. so much for the "got elected to make money" theory .. yeah?







what else does one expect from a socialist? unlike YR at least you admit it. so what is it about being a commie that gets your weenie to stand up? all commie leaders were mass murdering incompetent bastards. what's the attraction??I don't know. Ask trump.


BAHAHHAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
eccieuser9500's Avatar

What do we expect from a liar fresh from banning?

More of the same.
Outright lies.
Lies of omission.
Misrepresentations galore.

Welcome back? It's like you never left.

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
New year. Same Nazi.














dilbert firestorm's Avatar
New year. Same Nazi. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

please dont call people nazi.
winn dixie's Avatar
please dont call people nazi. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
I second that!