obnoxious marxism

the control of language

in orwell's 1984, power is “power over human beings” , but “above all over the mind” the party controls external reality through the control of the mind, and it controls the mind, through the control of language.

in this new congress ruled by dimocrats there is a new rule change:

copied are the changes:

Terms to be struck from clause 8(c)(3) of rule XXIII, the House’s Code of Official Conduct, as outlined in the new proposal include “father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, half sister, grandson, [and] granddaughter.”

The terms would be replaced with “parent, child, sibling, parent’s sibling, first cousin, sibling’s child, spouse, parent-in-law, child-in-law, sibling-in-law, stepparent, stepchild, stepsibling, half-sibling, [and] grandchild.”

whatever happened to honoring women? now anyone can be a woman, and women no longer are mothers for it is now parent and since anyone can be a parent, giving life has no distinction

its all part of the destruction of the family

in the 19th century, utopian socialists preceeded marx and engels in the rejection of family relationships

though marx and engels did not instigate anti-family attitudes, they, especially engels, contributed greatly to it

black lives matter's goal, or at least among their goals is the marxist destruction of the family

on what was blm's “What We Believe” page they state that their goals can only be achieved through the disruption of the “western-prescribed nuclear family structure.”

“we disrupt the western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement,” the site declared, “by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable.”

the word “fathers” is deliberately excluded, replaced by the gender-neutral “parents” despite already naming “mothers” as pillars of the family.

now this congress takes it a step further and eliminates even the word mother

if you don't think marxism has taken over the dimocrat party you have your head in the sand

its time for you people to wake up

Ya know making it simpler with terms is actually sensible. Most state law in the family law realms have already simplified terms.

Poor you. Complaining about nothing of real relevance.

I'm glad you're here, maybe something will sink in at some point

Need to change your handle.

DPST's could get an education in Reality from posters such as NGIT, HF, and others.

However,.............


Perhaps the DPST majority could be reminded - it is majority by 4 seats.

Ya know making it simpler with terms is actually sensible. Most state law in the family law realms have already simplified terms.

Poor you. Complaining about nothing of real relevance. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

Then let's start with you. You are now and forever more or until Republicans retake power, forbidden under penalty of law, to call yourself BlackMAN, man now being an unacceptable and derogatory term that does not comport with the new cultural order. And next, identifying oneself by color will be outlawed. Now, since you can no longer use Man or Black, would you care to share what your new handle will be in 2021?



It is curious why you felt the need to tell everybody you are Black. Imagine what would be said if somebody came here with the handle 1Whiteman1. He would be instantly labeled a racist.


The cultural revolution has begun and there won't be anything simple about it when the penalties start being applied to those who refuse to cooperate with the new order.

Not at all curious why this would stick in your craw, bub.

Maybe his name is blackman...

Are you actually complaining about someone else's handle, HF?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA!

I initially chose the handle because when I started on this site NBA was a big deal with the ladies. To make life simpler for me and them when inquiring about getting together they could see the handle and know - oh he’s black - I’m no blacks allowed I’ll just not respond to him or - oh he’s black and that doesn’t matter to me so I’ll respond.

There was no political agenda behind it. Still isn’t. Was just a convenience.

As I said in my initial response to the thread, simplifying brother snd sister to sibling does just that. Simplifies. In law that move has been being made for years. Mothers and fathers became parents because that’s what they are.

Much ado about nothing.

He's lashing out.

They all are.

The sun is setting on the Stupid Empire.

IAs I said in my initial response to the thread, simplifying brother snd sister to sibling does just that. Simplifies. In law that move has been being made for years. Mothers and fathers became parents because that’s what they are.

. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

first, when you claim its about simplification you're only fooling yourself and lying to us

second- child-n-law or step sibling or parent-in-law or all the rest of the Marxism is simplification?

hey I have someone I want to introduce you to - my ex child-in-law and maybe you can date my step sibling, errr ok but is it a boy or girl?, you cant say boy or girl I will report you now. hey, please don't report me, at least I said it, instead of he or she!

my sincere hope for you is you learn to resist your indoctrination and let truth flow

simplification is just word play. clear socialist agenda behind it. but continue the denial.

It really is simply people dah. Putin/trump bad...Biden/Harris not so bad

Scott Clay
19 hours ago

Phew, It’s a good thing that “Idiots” is gender neutral.

The bad news is sooo good for Biden. He beat the biggest loser while setting a record for the most legal votes in the history of the world.

Gawd i wanna raw dawg Tulsi!