A couple of weeks ago there was a review that listed "LFK-no tongue" in the Activities. I commented that I was trying to figure out how you could French kiss without tongue. That touched off a discussion bordering on an argument as to the meaning of LFK. One hobbyist stated that it could mean Light Facial Kissing and provided a link to the Sex Industry Dictionary compiled by Jami Rodman. I contacted Jami Rodman and explained that since the dictionary defined FK as French Kissing and DFK as Deep French Kissing it was inconsistent and illogical to define LFK as Light Facial Kissing. When I checked back with the dictionary last week the definition of LFK had been changed to Light French Kissing which brought it in line with all the other references that I found for LFK.
https://jamirodman.com/sex-industry-...s-terminology/
Therefore, when doing a review any use of an anagram containing FK means that tongues were involved. (And no speaking in tongues does not count.) However, this does nothing to unblur the line between LFK and DFK. Different people have different ideas about where that line is. This is going to upset Pit because he thinks that his definition is the only one. Actually I probably agree more with Pit's definition, but I have had enough experience to know that there is a wide range of kissing styles.
The main point of this thread is that in order to use FK, LFK, or DFK there must be tongue. Otherwise the reviews are not consistent.