Now we have proof that this bozo operated under a different name. I expect the moderator will do the right thing and ban him. By the way, there is no evidence that contradicts one theory that I proposed. The results of the search actually lend credence to the theory.
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
So the failure to find it in the vast deep ocean doesn't mean that it was a hopeless task to begin with? In your mind it means it is on land? You seem to believe that absence of proof is proof of absence. It isn't. That's a classical logical fallacy.
You have also completely forgotten that they found parts of the plane washed up on shore in the Indian Ocean. That's proof that the plane went down in the ocean. They just haven't found the fuselage and bodies.
Or do you another theory that explains how the body of the plane could be hidden under camouflage on an island while pieces of the wing are floating in the ocean?