This is such a touchy subject. First let me say that I am 100% against racism of any kind. Any human with one color of skin showing preference or disregard toward any other human with a different color of skin, just because of the color of skin is horrible - no matter which direction. We are all human and we all deserve dignity and respect regardless of the pigment we have.
That said, there is also the very real and personal issue of physical attraction. If a man were a sex worker serving women, and his skin was “Color 1” and he was not physically attracted to a woman with skin “Color 2” and because he isn’t physically attracted, he can’t get it up to serve her: Is he racist for refusing service?
If one human isn’t attracted to another human, for whatever reason: skinny, fat, tats, tall, short, hair type or color, eye color, some body part physical size or shape, etc. ad Infinitum... in the sex worker industry, is it discrimination to refuse service based on the lack of attraction in any area?
I mean, yes it is a service businesses and in any normal service business setting, it would obviously be discriminatory behavior to refuse service based on physical attributes; however, this is sex. Sex by nature requires mutual attraction and is a deeply personal issue.
I imagine that this issue is not going to be resolved anytime soon; but, WALDT, and right of refusal in the sex worker world seems to be acceptable on almost any area of personal taste, with exception to the growing issue of race. Given that personal and physical attraction is such an important aspect in the context of sex, it just doesn’t make sense to me.
That post isn’t a statement of judgment, but rather an acknowledgment that I don’t understand the depth and complexities of this issue enough to definitively say that a provider of any skin color refusing to see a client of any other skin color is actually racism.