Why should a female allow her content on a site that no longer offers her value or allows her to contribute her content ?
Originally Posted by Britttany_love
To begin with, a review is the product of the member that writes it and it chronicles HIS experience with a provider. It is not a female's "content" any more than a restaurant has a say over the YELP review of their food, presentation, service etc.
You are actually still capable of contributing content, participating in conversations, starting conversations, researching ladies that men have reviewed, contacting them via the site and there is still a provider only area for sharing information related to yours and others safety.
Or is it your position that none of that had any value?
Would be your position that reviews from clients did nothing to promote a provider? That any visiting lady to Austin gained nothing from having a review of her pop at the start of her visit? That "Flavor of the Month" girls never actually existed and that any/all business garnered by women on ECCIE was the result of their ads?
If there is an exodus from ECCIE it will only be to the detriment of those leaving. One effect this should have (although providers may not be open minded enough to realize it) is that the tag you all have by your names linking to you ECCIE reviews is still advertising and promotional and the only way to be on someone's mind is to have a presence here as well as current reviews.