Pelosi claims the tax bill will create an Armageddon!

And who is deranged? First Conyers is an Icon, now the end of the world is coming because of tax cuts. What a fucking kook! May the snowflakes scurry for their holes!


https://nypost.com/2017/12/04/this-i...-tax-bill/amp/

And they wonder why they’ve been getting their asses kicked in elections. DUH!

The new found deficit hawk mentions nothing about the 9 trillion in spending over the next ten years.

Peloci and Conyers would make a great Vaudville Act.

And who is deranged? First Conyers is an Icon, now the end of the world is coming because of tax cuts. What a fucking kook! May the snowflakes scurry for their holes!


https://nypost.com/2017/12/04/this-i...-tax-bill/amp/

And they wonder why they’ve been getting their asses kicked in elections. DUH!

The new found deficit hawk mentions nothing about the 9 trillion in spending over the next ten years. Originally Posted by bambino

to be fair, she's suffering from dementia and something else (face freeze)

the dingbat doesn't know what the hell she is talking about.

she is pretty much toast in next years election.

https://mobile.twitter.com/Protectth...23362004520963

And who is deranged? First Conyers is an Icon, now the end of the world is coming because of tax cuts. What a fucking kook! May the snowflakes scurry for their holes!


https://nypost.com/2017/12/04/this-i...-tax-bill/amp/

And they wonder why they’ve been getting their asses kicked in elections. DUH!

The new found deficit hawk mentions nothing about the 9 trillion in spending over the next ten years. Originally Posted by bambino

These people are nothing but left overs from the Obama administration. They don't know shit what they are talking about.

Jim

And who is deranged? First Conyers is an Icon, now the end of the world is coming because of tax cuts. What a fucking kook! May the snowflakes scurry for their holes!


https://nypost.com/2017/12/04/this-i...-tax-bill/amp/

And they wonder why they’ve been getting their asses kicked in elections. DUH!

The new found deficit hawk mentions nothing about the 9 trillion in spending over the next ten years. Originally Posted by bambino

OR how obama single handedly DROVE our debt up 10 trillion over his 8 years in office, MORE than all the prior presidents combined..

Do you mean to tell me that Nancy Pelosi actually read this bill so she knows what's in it? ..... oh the irony ..... although yes I do realize about the Odumbocare bill that she actually said "We have to pass it so we can know what's in it" .....

OR how obama single handedly DROVE our debt up 10 trillion over his 8 years in office, MORE than all the prior presidents combined.. Originally Posted by garhkal

Yeah, he essentially accrued two hundred years worth of debt in eight years.


Jim

Yeah, he essentially accrued two hundred years worth of debt in eight years.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Yes, but so did bush, daddy bush, and Reagan.

3 out of 4 presidents with the largest deficit increases were Republicans.

It wasn't either of their faults really. The biggest part of the budgets are mandatory. Meaning they can do nothing more than fill their cowboy boots up with vaseline and squish around the white house and the deficits would still be huge.

Surprisingly enough it was that libtarded bastard married to Hilary that actually did not increase the deficit during his presidency.

However, that wasn't his fault, or rather wasn't entirely to his credit either.

Daddy bushes tax increases in addition to Clinton's further payroll tax increases, in addition to a huge tech market boom helped.

One might ask, with such high mandatory spending how can anyone justify a tax cut?

One might ask, with such high mandatory spending how can anyone justify a tax cut? Originally Posted by grean

Cause none of the idiots in office, realise that if you don't want to grow the deficit, YOU NEED TO CUT spending, but they are all too cowardly to go after entitlements which consume almost 50% of what our budget goes for..

That's hard to do. Everyone gets old. What's not hard to do is raise taxes or reduce military spending.

Cause none of the idiots in office, realise that if you don't want to grow the deficit, YOU NEED TO CUT spending, but they are all too cowardly to go after entitlements which consume almost 50% of what our budget goes for.. Originally Posted by garhkal

Social security makes up 23% of the total budget. Medicare makes up another 15%. Hopefully you are not including social security and medicare under "entitlement programs" which should be cut.

One might ask, with such high mandatory spending how can anyone justify a tax cut? Originally Posted by grean

One might ask why the US should limp along with a 1.8% GDP. One might answer tax cuts will promote economic growth. It’s happening already. More jobs means more taxpayers and more revenues. Spending does nothing to increase revenues. One might say. Just sayin.

That's hard to do. Everyone gets old. What's not hard to do is raise taxes or reduce military spending. Originally Posted by grean

Social security is NOT an entitlement as EVERYONE who works pays into it.. Welfare, EBT, EITC, Section 8.. THOSE are all entitlements.

Social security makes up 23% of the total budget. Medicare makes up another 15%. Hopefully you are not including social security and medicare under "entitlement programs" which should be cut. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Yes i am. IF THEY CRACKED the hell down on all the fraud in both of those programs imo they could EASILY cut them down by 10%..