Question about NY Upstate Forums

It seems like there's enough activity in each of the three cities (Buffalo, Syracuse, and Rochester) to warrant three different forums. I have to sort through by a search or just clicking through them to find the city I'm visiting. So, I'm just saying my desire to have the forum split into three, by location.

I don't know whether other people feel this way and how much work it would be to for the moderator or website to sort the reviews by the cities or start posting this way.

I could be wrong, but I think most people would prefer the status quo. People in Buffalo, Rochester and Syracuse feel connected, and many ladies routinely travel among all three cities. Besides, it is not difficult to search under each city's name.

I agree Jack

Agreed.

I agree with Jack. I prefer one forum for the three cities.

OK. Good to get people's opinions. I guess I'm in the minority.

as an agency who DOES travel from time to time I definitely like the fact that all three cities are combined... +1

Buffalo, Syracuse, and Rochester in one forum. Now east of Syracuse I could see.

OSD, was the sauce simmering too much? Needed to stir the pot on this one again? Haha.

It would be nice if the control panel allowed for filtration of topics by geography, or even within category. Failing that, a bit more info on the summary screen so I can skip over topics (e.g. Buffalo reviews) that are f limited interest for me.

I do like the breadth of contributions from the wider area on the general discussion topics, so, if the choice was status quo vs subdivsion, I'm for the status quo.