Convictions! Do the democrats have them?

The obvious answer is YES. There many convictions in the democratic party and the latest come from Indiana. Seems some democratic party leaders faked the signatures on the Obama and Clinton petitions to get on the state ballot. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...t-Fraudulently This means that a very populous county would not have either the ballot and since the rules require participation by each county then both democrats would not have been on the state ballots. So Hillary or Barack legally on the ballot or not. If neither was then shouldn't I hear some outcry on the part of those who claim to be fair, honest, and believe in the rules.

seems like I remember Beerfart faking some shit too ...

lets see if these links are live ..


The "video evidence" of Shirley Sherrod's "racism" (NEW)
"Nationwide ACORN child prostitution investigation" (UPDATED)
Platform for anti-gay Jennings smears
Breitbart-promoted O'Keefe Census tape features selective editing (NEW)
Breitbart-promoted video falsely accuses Democrats of reconciliation hypocrisy (NEW)
Wild accusations over Gladney case
Breitbart's websites make baseless claim that NEA engaged in lawbreaking
Bertha Lewis' nonexistent White House visit
The Maoist Christmas tree ornaments
The ACORN "document dump"
False claims of community organizers "praying" to Obama


snick ..

The obvious answer is YES. There many convictions in the democratic party and the latest come from Indiana. Seems some democratic party leaders faked the signatures on the Obama and Clinton petitions to get on the state ballot. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...t-Fraudulently This means that a very populous county would not have either the ballot and since the rules require participation by each county then both democrats would not have been on the state ballots. So Hillary or Barack legally on the ballot or not. If neither was then shouldn't I hear some outcry on the part of those who claim to be fair, honest, and believe in the rules. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Whirrly swimming in the delusion of insanity deflecting the floundering of his party ...

The obvious answer is YES. There many convictions in the democratic party and the latest come from Indiana. Seems some democratic party leaders faked the signatures on the Obama and Clinton petitions to get on the state ballot. http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...t-Fraudulently This means that a very populous county would not have either the ballot and since the rules require participation by each county then both democrats would not have been on the state ballots. So Hillary or Barack legally on the ballot or not. If neither was then shouldn't I hear some outcry on the part of those who claim to be fair, honest, and believe in the rules. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Hey JD, did you just see Judge Jeanine? The first 8 minutes. WOW...watch it later tonight if not.

So Hillary or Barack legally on the ballot or not. If neither was then shouldn't I hear some outcry on the part of those who claim to be fair, honest, and believe in the rules. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

When you show proof they were on the ballot illegally, that proof being accepted by the election boards or legal authorities with juristiction over the case, that's when you will hear a response or outcry from me concerning this subject.

That is when the fair, the honest, and those who believe in the rules would would respond or cry out.
Because the U S Constitution, perhaps you've heard of it, says a person is innocent until proven guilty.

It looks like there might be something to the rumors that Kansas had secretly suceeded from the US.

Why else would jd and sog think the Constitution was different there?

Geez, MunchOnMen, I haven't even posted on this thread, and you are attacking me. Creepy how I occupy your mind, what there is of it.

In a criminal case the defendant has the benefit of being presumed innocent by the authorities. The press and the public are another matter. The defenders were found guilty by a court of law, two others plead guilty. By my count that is four guilty verdicts. Those verdicts PROVE that in St. Joseph county Indiana Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton were illegally on the primary ballot. The primary rules in Indiana require all counties participate and as such both democrats failed to get on the primary ballot for the entire state. Can we correct this little peccadillo? No, it would be wasted motion. Obama would still be president and he would still be a cluster fuck. What it should demonstrate to a rational person is that the democratic party has a cancer inside of it. Authorities who think that any thing goes to get a win even when they are going to win anyway. That is what the Nixon administration was guilty of. They were going to win but just had to break laws to get an edge. Nixon resigned for something that we know he didn't order but he was guilty of protecting his people after the fact. Obama or Hillary probably didn't order this cheating (illegal activity) but their failure to take any action after the fact makes them just as guilty as Richard Nixon.

You may now write your hypocritical answer that has nothing to do with the subject at hand.

William J. Jefferson. a Louisiana Democrat congresscritter most certainly has conviction.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/14/us...jefferson.html

Still one of my favorites

In a raid on Mr. Jefferson’s Washington-area home in August 2005, federal agents found $90,000 neatly wrapped in aluminum foil in a freezer. Prosecutors said the money was from Kentucky business interests and was supposed to be a bribe for a high Nigerian official, who later denied being part of any scheme.

that is cold cash,good for hiring hookers.

William J. Jefferson. a Louisiana Democrat congresscritter most certainly has conviction.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/14/us...jefferson.html

Still one of my favorites Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

He had it wrapped in foil so the feds could not detect it!