yeah they can, they do it every day
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
And to put a fine point on it, the DOJ wants to investigate and possible charge parents for shouting "threats" of "I'm going to vote you out of office", as domestic terrorism. Of course any threat of bodily harm must be investigated but that can be done by local police. The only justification for bringing the feds into this would be proof that this is an organized conspiracy that crosses state lines. There is no proof of that.
But did the DOJ decide to investigate and prosecute the people who where burning down buildings, in one case with law enforcement blockaded in that building they wanted to burn down but is that "domestic terrorism"? I guess not in the eyes of the DOJ
The woman that followed Sinema into the bathroom on the other hand, did break the law and was clearly a domestic terrorist if applying these new standards of the DOJ.
On Sunday, left-wing activists confronted Sinema in a classroom at Arizona State University in Phoenix and proceeded to film and follow her walking into a public bathroom. Despite filming someone in a bathroom without their consent is illegal in Arizona,
Will she be charged? Don't hold your breath.
Here's an interesting twist brought to us by Tucker Carlson, information you will definitely not hear on MSM like the Hunter story, it will be suppressed..
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10069425/Garland-accused-conflict-ties-education-group-promoting-Critical-Race-Theory.html
AG Garland's daughter is married to founder of education group promoting Critical Race Theory: Parents accuse Biden admin of conflict of interest as DOJ ups investigation into parents.
Attorney General Merrick Garland's daughter Rebecca Garland is married to the co-founder of Panorama Education, a group that allegedly utilizes Critical Race Theory teachings and has contracts with school boards across the country, an alarmed parents' group revealed on Tuesday.
The group, Parents Defending Education (PDE), is now accusing Garland of a conflict of interest after the attorney general directed the FBI to step up enforcement against threats to teachers and other education officials.
A Panorama Education told DailyMail.com that it is 'an independent education organization that partners with schools and districts to support student literacy and social-emotional learning.'
So, the Garland family is making money pushing the very things these parents are protesting about, what their children are being taught and now the AG is stepping in to defend what his daughter and son in law are making money from by going after the parents? Conflict of interest anybody?