http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=43454
Thankfully, she includes a second picture with real image. She is a cute chick, but if you are not a TAT guy, you might arrive and be very disappointed based on first pic.
Anyone else agree?
Pink
...if you are not a TAT guy, you might arrive and be very disappointed based on first pic. Originally Posted by itsallpinkI think you're being a bit picky, pinky. Who's gonna look at the first pic and skip the second? And since no one is going to assume that she had that tat removed I just don't see a problem.
I think she looks great in both pictures. Originally Posted by Tara EvansI don't think anyone denies that Tara, it's the possibility a client could make an appointment based on the first pic and be shocked at seeing the truth of the second in person. Unlike you, who lays her unbridled beauty and sexiness out for all to see, tats and all.
I don't think anyone denies that Tara, it's the possibility a client could make an appointment based on the first pic and be shocked at seeing the truth of the second in person. Unlike you, who lays her unbridled beauty and sexiness out for all to see, tats and all.Thanks sweetieOriginally Posted by DFK Hunter
Airbrushed tat? I'm wondering what is going on with the fore ground leg where it attaches the hip.Well, if she had the photographer photoshop out the tat in that top photo, it looks like she may have asked him to photoshop out some of the thickness of her thighs also. Go take a look at all the photos in her Showcase (proper research that everyone should do) and you will see another large tat on her back and if you look at the last photo in the black pants, you can see that she may have a much larger backside than the other photos show BUT at least she posts enough photos to look and learn. And there are a lot of guys who love a girl with a thicker ass instead of some skinny underfed gal.
She still looks nice though. Originally Posted by Jobe0111