So, you still think Covid came from Bats?

https://rumble.com/c/SaltyCracker


Ruh Roh

https://t.me/saltycrackernews/1918

The msm and fauxi tried to sell that narrative hard!

the truth was coming out eventually. China can hand out all the fake "data" they can but sooner rather than later other scientists not controlled by China or shilling for the far left radical media would get real samples to test.


Occam's razor loosely translates to "the simplest explanation is usually the best one."


so which explanation is the best one? someone ate bad bat stew from a wet market or a lab known for safety issues and funded in part by the US and Fauci to study and genetically manipulate these viruses had an "accident"?

the truth was coming out eventually. China can hand out all the fake "data" they can but sooner rather than later other scientists not controlled by China or shilling for the far left radical media would get real samples to test.


Occam's razor loosely translates to "the simplest explanation is usually the best one."


so which explanation is the best one? someone ate bad bat stew from a wet market or a lab known for safety issues and funded in part by the US and Fauci had an "accident"? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

The liberals are so into following the science. The science is saying it was made in a lab. The horse has left the barn. Hold on. Lots of shits going to hit the fan sooner rather than later. The war is tilting towards the white hats.

Why did Trump allow this attack?

Or did he facilitate it?

Why did Trump allow this attack?

Or did he facilitate it? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Obama and Fauci did. Do a little research. It was released to take Trump down. How could Trump stop it? But China could have. Why did they shut down travel to and from Wuhan in China? But allow international travel. Just ask yourself that simple question. Trump stopped travel from China and was abused for doing so.

NCSWIC

Why did Trump allow this attack?

Or did he facilitate it? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

so you are admitting it was a deliberate attack. by doing so you admit the attack was directly pointed at interfering with the leadership of the US to give cover to Biden to steal the election. and install their puppet in the White House.



thanks for clearing that up!!


BAHHAAAAAA

Why did Trump "allow" this attack? And one wonders why I have YR on ignore. SMH

YR may want to ask how Fauci was predicting a pandemic in 2017:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=puqaaeLnEww

Oh, it’s a video on YouTube so it’s libtard approved.

Why did Trump allow this attack?

Or did he facilitate it? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

c'mon man.

I read the article. According to the Daily Mail https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail they received a 22 page scientific paper to be published in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery (which I couldn't find online). This paper claims that they have proof that the coronavirus has been modified by "laboratory manipulation".

I would be interested in having some peer review done before I cast judgement on whether their claims can be proven or not. A single paper by 2 scientists doesn't constitute any kind of scientific consensus.


link to the article: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...dy-claims.html

VERY Interesting Topic!

I read the article. According to the Daily Mail https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail they received a 22 page scientific paper to be published in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery (which I couldn't find online). This paper claims that they have proof that the coronavirus has been modified by "laboratory manipulation".

I would be interested in having some peer review done before I cast judgement on whether their claims can be proven or not. A single paper by 2 scientists doesn't constitute any kind of scientific consensus.


link to the article: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...dy-claims.html Originally Posted by txdot-guy

What he said...

I read the article. According to the Daily Mail https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail they received a 22 page scientific paper to be published in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery (which I couldn't find online). This paper claims that they have proof that the coronavirus has been modified by "laboratory manipulation".

I would be interested in having some peer review done before I cast judgement on whether their claims can be proven or not. A single paper by 2 scientists doesn't constitute any kind of scientific consensus.


link to the article: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...dy-claims.html Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Nothing the CDC has said or Fauci was “peer” reviewed. The MSM reviewed their bullshit and blasted the propaganda.