The Mueller report

Witness tampering and hindering an investigation?



Somebody just doesn't want to prosecute.

[QUOTE=Trey;1061427535]….Trump still colluded with Russia its obvious.....[QUOTE]


Hahahaha!!!! Adam....Adam Schiff!!! Is that you, boy!?!?!





Judgement Day's Comin' for ya, baby!

Witness tampering and hindering an investigation?

Why was this Magoo fired?

Somebody just doesn't want to prosecute. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

So Trump shouldn't have fired Sessions? you liberals are so confusing!

https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-1...sect-1512.html

https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-1...sect-1510.html


https://www.lawfareblog.com/does-fbi...es-closer-look

In an op-ed last week, Professor Elizabeth Foley made the case that FBI investigations are covered only by 18 U.S.C. § 1510, a narrow statutory provision that prohibits only interference by means of bribery:

In the almost 120 years since Section 1505 and its predecessor have been on the books, no court appears to have ever held that an ongoing F.B.I. investigation qualifies as a “pending proceeding” within the meaning of the statute. Instead, Section 1505 applies to court or court-like proceedings to enforce federal law. In addition to prosecutions (where charges have been filed with a court), such proceedings include actions of enforcement by federal agencies such as the Internal Revenue Service, Securities and Exchange Commission or National Labor Relations Board, in which the agency has broad powers not merely to investigate statutory violations, but also to enforce them via subpoena or other administrative proceedings.

Foley may be right. A fair bit of authority suggests that an FBI criminal investigation is not a “pending proceeding” for the purposes of § 1505. The government has long conceded this point, in fact. Indeed, the U.S. Attorney’s Manual makes the blanket concession that “investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) are not section 1505 proceedings”—an interpretation that may well guide Special Counsel Robert Mueller in the conduct of his duties.

Retarded Lenny is that you

Originally Posted by Hotrod511

Here’s another genius I’m adding to my ignore list.

So Trump shouldn't have fired Sessions? you liberals are so confusing! Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Attorney General Magoo may have decided it IS a pending proceeding. Still confused?

Attorney General Magoo may have decided it IS a pending proceeding. Still confused? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

No.

" . . . a shift in behavior."

https://www.brainscape.com/flashcard.../packs/4576607

" . . . a shift in behavior." Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

Well thank you Perry Mason!


Let us know how that works out for ya!

Gerald Leonard "Gerry" Spence is a semi-retired American trial lawyer. He is a member of the American Trial Lawyers Hall of Fame. Spence has never lost a criminal case either as a prosecutor or a defense attorney. He has not lost a civil case since 1969.

Gerald Leonard "Gerry" Spence is a semi-retired American trial lawyer. He is a member of the American Trial Lawyers Hall of Fame. Spence has never lost a criminal case either as a prosecutor or a defense attorney. He has not lost a civil case since 1969. Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

bahahhahahaa


Spence. yeah eh sorry but i've known about his law career for years. and Mason actually did lose a few cases in the TV series. hey can't win them all, right Hillary?


BAHHHHAAAAAAAAAA

Witness tampering and hindering an investigation? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

If you are speaking of Trump ... #1 have you read and researched the Federal statute criminalizing the "behavior"? Then ... more importantly ...

#2 name a witness with whom or to whom he "tampered" and Trump's act(s) that you claim is "tampering" ... AND
#3 describe an act he committed that "hindered" an investigation.

Caveat: Before you take that leap ... you might want to consider the INVESTIGATION into HallariousNoMore and her crimes that have been admitted factually and the role of Obaminable and his administration appointees ....

.... the concept of "prosecutorial discretion" challenges you!

Prosecutorial discretion is not a challenging concept. A handpicked Attorney General doesn't want to pursue charges based on the limited interpretation of a handpicked special prosecutor.

Let it go. Hillary is no more. Obama should not be in your nightmares anymore. Precedent should be made now.

Or else the opulent minory will continue to suppress the majority.





+




+

X





=

A stacked deck.
















FDR tried to do the same thing. But comparing his majesty to FDR is like "comparing Lincoln to Bozo the Clown." Ben Stein

Quite enough evidence for a Trump Derangement Syndrome diagnosis.

Prosecutorial discretion is not a challenging concept. A handpicked Attorney General doesn't want to pursue charges based on the limited interpretation of a handpicked special prosecutor.

Let it go. Hillary is no more. Obama should not be in your nightmares anymore. Precedent should be made now.

Or else the opulent minory will continue to suppress the majority.





+




+

X





=

A stacked deck.
















FDR tried to do the same thing. But comparing his majesty to FDR is like "comparing Lincoln to Bozo the Clown." Ben Stein
Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

All AGs are “hand picked” by the POTUS. Rod Rosenstein, who hired Mueller, and a team of prosecutors at the DOJ came to the conclusion, along with Barr, NO OBSTRUCTION.