https://t.me/BoldSpearElmerFudd/60997
BAHAHAHAHA
That's that pesky "uphold and defend" oathy thing. Most judges I know actually believe that. Trump never did. Originally Posted by Yssup RiderOh. It would be so easy for those conservatives if we had the English jurispurdence (sp) thing here: Guilty until proven Innocent. That'd nail Hillary for sure.
Oh. It would be so easy for those conservatives if we had the English jurispurdence (sp) thing here: Guilty until proven Innocent. That'd nail Hillary for sure.
Wait....
Forget it.
The amount of times donny was taken to court, he'd never have a chance to plead since he is assumed Guilty.
Sorry. Mea Culpa. Originally Posted by Precious_b
you are wrong. in the UK, like America, you are innocent until proven guilty.Ah. Ima dating myself. DaFuq I get it from was when I was first there. That was a few decades ago. Quite a few. Glad I'm able to give you something to really pounce on that is, at this time, correct. So, i'll have to recheck from the time I was there, which *might* be correct for the time as to who had the burden to prove.
"We've all heard the phrase 'innocent until proven guilty'. This is the assumption that underpins criminal proceedings in the UK. Under Article 6 (2) of the Human Rights Act 1988, it is the prosecution's job to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that the person on trial is guilty of the offence they stand accused of."
wtf did you get that idea about the UK legal system? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid