Another example of Obummer the Hypocrite

Who wants to bet some of the money he's raising ends up in his pockets.

http://news.yahoo.com/little-sunligh...141256869.html

SCOTUS rules on this all legal.

Who wants to bet some of the money he's raising ends up in his pockets.

http://news.yahoo.com/little-sunligh...141256869.html Originally Posted by satexasguy

He has spoken out against super-pacs. A republican creation. They should not be used by either side.

Since one side will continue to use their own creation, why would you think the other side wouldn't?. They do exactly what the conservatives who passed the legislation that allows them to exist wanted them to do. They could hardly be more opaque.

In your mind it's worse being the party that wants them eliminated but uses them, than the party that created and embraces as well as uses them.

You're saying that they can't be spoken against by someone who uses them. Which is bullshit.
Advocating change while playing by the rules isn't being a hypocrite.

For those who haven't read the article, Obummer was against this. But now he glady uses it.

For those who haven't read the article, Obummer was against this. But now he glady uses it. Originally Posted by satexasguy

Missed my post, huh? He still is against them.
I reposted it for your repost. I noticed you don't say anything about who brought them into existence, who doesn't decry them but embraces them, etc.

He has spoken out against super-pacs. A republican creation. They should not be used by either side.

Since one side will continue to use their own creation, why would you think the other side wouldn't?. They do exactly what the conservatives who passed the legislation that allows them to exist wanted them to do. They could hardly be more opaque.

In your mind it's worse being the party that wants them eliminated but uses them, than the party that created and embraces as well as uses them.

You're saying that they can't be spoken against by someone who uses them. Which is bullshit.
Advocating change while playing by the rules isn't being a hypocrite. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

For those who read the article. For those that only read the op title.

Who wants to bet some of the money he's raising ends up in his pockets.

http://news.yahoo.com/little-sunligh...141256869.html Originally Posted by satexasguy

fucking idiot

Here are the facts:

1) Odumbo opposed the use of special interest organizations to bank roll candidates.

2) Now Odumbo is using those same tactics to raise money from Super PACS to fund candidates.

Assup and Munch .. you are both idiots if you can't see this is the definition of being a hypocrite.

The following lyrics from "The Gambler" (by Kenny Rogers) specifically applies to playing cards.

If you think about it, there is also could be a playing politics application:

"If you're gonna play the game, boy, you gotta learn to play it right

You got to know when to hold 'em, know when to fold 'em
Know when to walk away and know when to run
You never count your money when you're sittin' at the table
There'll be time enough for countin' when the dealing's done

Every gambler knows that the secret to survivin'
Is knowin' what to throw away and knowing what to keep
'Cause every hand's a winner and every hand's a loser
And the best that you can hope for is to die in your sleep"

Sorry Yssup and Munch, Obama has railed too many times against Super PAC's in the past not to be labelled a hypocrite now for using them. You can dress it up and justify it all you want but facts are facts.

Everyone who knows me has heard me rail about SUV's time and again. I hate them and anyone who knows me knows that. They why wouldn't matter if I turn around and buy one after bad mouthing them all these years. A hypocrite is still a hypocrite. Of course, I don't plan on buying an SUV now or ever. But if I do, you may feel free to call me a hypocrite.

Sorry Yssup and Munch, Obama has railed too many times against Super PAC's in the past not to be labelled a hypocrite now for using them. You can dress it up and justify it all you want but facts are facts.

Everyone who knows me has heard me rail about SUV's time and again. I hate them and anyone who knows me knows that. They why wouldn't matter if I turn around and buy one after bad mouthing them all these years. A hypocrite is still a hypocrite. Of course, I don't plan on buying an SUV now or ever. But if I do, you may feel free to call me a hypocrite. Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh

If you were in a foot race, and your opponent showed up with a motorcycle would you still race on foot or get a motorcycle? Even though you had said they weren't fair.

If you were in a foot race, and your opponent showed up with a motorcycle would you still race on foot or get a motorcycle? Even though you had said they weren't fair. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

If you are in a foot race and someone shows up in a motorcycle, the that person would be disqualified because IT'S A FOOT RACE you idiot!

If you are in a foot race and someone shows up in a motorcycle, the that person would be disqualified because IT'S A FOOT RACE you idiot! Originally Posted by satexasguy

(to Eva) If you are in a foot race and someone shows up in a motorcycle, the that person would be disqualified because IT'S A FOOT RACE you idiot! Originally Posted by satexasguy

You bitch slapped that dumb son of a bitch!!

If you are in a foot race and someone shows up in a motorcycle, the that person would be disqualified because IT'S A FOOT RACE you idiot! Originally Posted by satexasguy

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Went right over you two idiots head, God we have a bunch of zero's on this board. As you have shown.