Trump throws in the towel

A true fucking douche-bag.
Knows he's going to lose so he pisses in the punch bowl.

Columbus, Ohio (CNN)Donald Trump on Monday took his complaints about the "rigged" political system one step further.
"I'm afraid the election's going to be rigged. I have to be honest," Trump told voters in Ohio, a crucial swing state.
Trump's comments Monday came as he decried Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders for endorsing Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary, even as some Sanders supporters have continued to resist unifying behind the nominee. Trump has sought to siphon off Sanders supporters and draw them to his campaign.
Trump added that he has heard "more and more" that the November election will be rigged -- suggesting to his supporters that the outcome of the election is out of the hands of voters.

Trump during the primary repeatedly slammed the "rigged system" he claimed was working against his campaign to capture the Republican nomination for president. He then pivoted to using that language to decry the nomination process on the left, accusing the Democratic Party of colluding with the Clinton campaign to keep Sanders from winning that party's nomination.

Read More


Trump's comments during the primary bolstered the impression that Trump, a political outsider, was leading the charge against a corrupt political system.
But his latest comments could hurt Trump's general election campaign as his supporters might decide not to turn out to vote if the election is already "rigged" against their candidate.
Trump continued with the "rigged" theme during a Monday night interview on Fox News. Appearing on "Hannity," the Republican nominee suggested the potential for foul play in November. Trump pointed to the 2012 presidential election as a cause for concern.
"I've been hearing about it for a long time," Trump said. "And I know last time, there were -- you had precincts where there was practically nobody voting for the Republican. And I think that's wrong. I think that was unfair, frankly" for 2012 GOP nominee Mitt Romney.
"I'm telling you, November 8, we'd better be careful, because that election is going to be rigged," Trump added. "And I hope the Republicans are watching closely or it's going to be taken away from us."

There is one way we'll be able to tell if the elections were rigged.

If trump wins!

He's a petulant child turned bully. Now that he's trailing in the polls by growing numbers he'll ramp up the outrageous rhetoric, not because it'll help him, but because he can't help himself.

Knowing that, will the Democrats continue to bait him?

Hell yes!

He's a petulant child turned bully. Now that he's trailing in the polls by growing numbers he'll ramp up the outrageous rhetoric, not because it'll help him, but because he can't help himself.

Knowing that, will the Democrats continue to bait him?

Hell yes! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

He's been the nrc nominee for a whole week and a half.
Time to start making excuses.

He's a petulant child turned bully. Now that he's trailing in the polls by growing numbers he'll ramp up the outrageous rhetoric, not because it'll help him, but because he can't help himself.

Knowing that, will the Democrats continue to bait him?

Hell yes! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Well assup piggy mamboolah, YOU dumbascraps ARE master baters !

Ignore.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-...101500940.html



]

Read More Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

I see the GasBag is trying to GasLight us, again...


96 Hours of Stunning Globalist Panic Continues – Tick Tock, Tick Tock…

Posted on August 2, 2016 by sundance

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...ock-tick-tock/

The past 96 hours of media onslaught have evidenced what most of you already know, the ‘at risk’ financial interests of the UniParty are going hard against Donald Trump from every imaginable angle.

The timing is specific, the UniParty affiliates are trying to do the narrative damage before people become distracted with the Rio Olympic games.

Hopefully none of this has come as a surprise to CTH readers. At least those who have been here since we first discovered the intent of the Wall Street / UniParty legislative agenda in the fall of 2013, and began exposing their specific and predictable approach.

The UniParty is fully aligned. It is no longer Democrats vs Republicans, it’s Globalists vs America-First Nationalists. President Obama, Paul Ryan, Nancy Pelosi, Tom Donohue, Mitch McConnell, the Koch Brothers, the Media, Wall Street, and the DNC are all aligned together, working hand-in-hand, toward a specific set of agenda items.

Candidate Donald Trump is the single existential threat to this carefully created UniParty construct they have spent billions to organize.

Is it a daunting task for Trump to overcome the scope of the alignment against him? Sure it is, but there has been –and continues to be– an awakening.

“Subtlety”, “nuance”, “twitches”, “tremors”, “fine tuning”, these the less visible notations a researcher can find when they look into the quiet data the smart-set stroll past. Quiet data is often overlooked because it’s not sexy, nor is it scriptable or moldable by the media.

It just is.


Angel of Death - Demonic False PurityReminder, when the New York Times is noticed shuffling around in the same data sets, you inherently know they are attempting to quantify the reality behind the stats the MSM consistently, and fraudulently, represent.

In addition, when they stop looking over their shoulder and begin polishing off the dirt from the ‘impossible to skip‘ glowing nugget, well,.. they wouldn’t be standing next to us if they didn’t suspect we were mining real data, reality data, in a much more empirical locale.

CTH readers already know the scope of the research we’ve put into this election. Our spidey senses also anticipate a certain republican candidate has previously invested in a very similar endeavor. Indeed, it would be impossible for us to predict so accurately were it not for an accidental synergy and ideological alignment therein.

In a rare admission, the New York Times walked back over 10 years of prior demographic presentations regarding the U.S. electorate. In essence what they are saying is the voting base is far less ethnically diverse and far more white than historic leftist presentations.

Oh my.

The New York Times is also outlining something, carefully, without actually outlining the something they need to be careful about. Candidate Donald Trump’s “potential” broad-based coalition is far larger, magnitudes larger, than candidate Hillary Clinton’s “potential” identity-brand political coalition.

Everyone who follows presidential politics should go read THE ARTICLE HERE; and pay close attention to the data sets which accompany the presentation (click to expand the detail within their data). We would particularly draw your attention to the following:




Why is that 10 million figure important?

Back in February 2016, after compiling approximately two years of semi-quantifiable voter trend and sentiment data, the first four GOP primary races were held: Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada.

That was the first time we were able to overlay the non quantifiable (sentiment data assembly) with the empirical results of four primary contests.

You might remember we found a jaw-dropping trend that was narrowing toward one possible reasonable conclusion; but we didn’t want to get out in front of our skis, so we asked a professional statistician to review –then summarize– our model.

Every prediction from that late February analysis has proven accurate. The remaining prediction was this:

[…] In 2008 21.9 million Republicans voted in the primary and 58.1 million voted in the general election (265% increase). In 2012 19.2 million primary -vs- 59.2 million in the general (308% increase).

If those increases are even remotely maintained given the scope of the current increase in Republican Primary participation, the general election vote would be through the roof.

And here is where you begin to understand the potential scope of the 2016 primary voter for the Republican nominee, Donald J Trump. This is the bottom line the media and establishment republicans do not want to see discussed. This is the potential for the “Trump Effect”:



That jaw-dropping number, 7.2 million more potential votes than Barack Obama carried in 2008 and almost 13 million more than Mitt Romney carried in 2012, is the least result achievable when you turn out THE MONSTER VOTE.

Remember, this same predictive model NAILED the turnout on both the GOP Primary side and the Democrat primary side. – SEE HERE–

What the New York Times is statistically beginning to quantify is the existence of The Monster Vote. If you look closely at the data behind their newly discovered 10 million potential/predictable voters, you’ll notice the additional votes carry to exactly what we predicted in February.

Even if Republican projection turnout was off by 5 million votes, Trump still wins in a landslide. Heck, even if the projection turnout was off by a staggering 10 million votes, the republican nominee (Trump) would still gets more votes than President Obama did in 2012 and it is highly doubtful Hillary could turn out that level of support. –link–

♦ Even the fact the NYT would write such an article tells you there are interests (financial interests, globalists) who are looking closely and trying to quantify the challenge they have in front of them.

♦ Remember, even in honest scientific polling – the poll methodologies are based on “assumptions”, or inputs into the collected poll samples in order to make them representative of the anticipated turnout.

♦ Thanks to Donald Trump, historic turnout trends are obsolete. Additionally, historic demographics and party affiliations are also obsolete; And, more importantly, as a consequence….

..any poll data that is relying on obsolete sample methodology is going to be significantly inaccurate.

Typical response. HE can't make a point so he concentrates a four-page blog post from somebody of unknown origin. Great job, douche bag!

assup, your wee wee misfired.

assup, your wee wee misfired. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Is he butt fucking you now dildo?

Hillary rigged the primary contests, and you don't think she'll rig the general election as much as she can? She is not honest. She will cheat. She will say AND do ANYTHING to get elected. And some of you clowns will support each and every corrupt dirty trick she pulls. You already fell for Khan scam. You'll fall for anything because Hillary does it. She could go skeet shooting with kittens, and you'd support her.

Just wanted to bump this thread because it shows what an ass DickMuncher is.

Has he emerged under another name ... or is just gone for 8 years?

Just wanted to bump this thread because it shows what an ass DickMuncher is. Originally Posted by gnadfly

+1

Thank you for the Public Service Reminder! Yes, MasterDickMuncher was quite the ass, wasn't he?

I speak of him in the past tense because I just noticed he hasn't posted on eccie since last November 8th... hmmm, did anything significant happen on that day???

Just wanted to bump this thread because it shows what an ass DickMuncher is. Originally Posted by gnadfly

We knew what a stupid Cocksucker he was. No need to remind us. Fuck him.