Encounter: Farrah

User ID: -
Date: 08/31/24
Name: Farrah RedVelvet
Phone: (504) 603-6412
Email Address: redvelvet222@protonmail.com
URL / Website: https://preferred411.com/P394637
City: New Orleans
State: Louisiana
Address: Treme Incall
Activities: Nice Conversation, LFK, DFK, DATY, BBBJ, CG
Hair Length and Color: Natural Medium Length Red Head
Age: Mid/Late 20’s
Smoking Status: Non-Smoker
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: 5’6” or so natural red head with freckles, blue eyes, and a girl next door slightly bohemian vibe.
Handful C cup and perky with nice puffy sensitive nipples. Thick through the thighs, hips, and ass but not heavy. Bare down below. Plenty of pics on Tryst that are absolutely her and represent her very well.
Recommendation: Yes

Please advise as so what specifically is missing from ROS that moderator would like included. Happy to share.

Please specify what information I left out of ROS that should be included. Thank You

Did you get a message from a mod saying that you were denied credit due to missing info? Usually they include what is missing in that notification. If you've gotten nothing, the a mod hasn't processed your review yet.

Thanks eholiday,

No Private Message from a moderator. Just a highlighted yellow bar above the message that says Did Not Meet Criteria - Insufficient ROS Details - Dr-epg on
Sep 4 2024 7:03 PM

That's unacceptable and unfortunately all too common.

There is your answer. Going into detail about activities in the ROS is what they require.

Your ROS has lots of important information about the details and set up of the meeting. You also included the details of the sexual parts of the encounter in more than one place. I agree with Raindog. Not giving you credit for this review undermines the purpose of this forum.

Who moderates this forum? I've stopped posting reviews because no matter what I write, I can't get credit. Note: I've been here since the ASPD days....

Me as well. And when you ask, it’s usually a snarky “sir” comment. I have no idea what’s going on but it’s always something it seems. Before, if something was missing it left off, at least they gave you the chance to correct it. I still firmly believe that reviews should only be posted if approved. If they are missing info that causes not to get PA, thr review should be canned as well.

Who moderates this forum? I've stopped posting reviews because no matter what I write, I can't get credit. Note: I've been here since the ASPD days.... Originally Posted by tboy

There are four mods of record for NOLA, but only one seems to be active and is close to 100% responsible for this board. That's Dr-epg.

From what I can tell, the administration is in charge of the mods, and assigns and replaces them as needed. The administrator is biomed1. He should be available to be contacted directly.

I have been contacted about this review and thread.
The Moderators listed for this Forum are also available to be reached.

A couple Members have stated that they have been around since the ASPD Days, as have I.
Writing an Encounter Report/Review that meets the Owner's Criteria is not difficult.
Below is a link to a "Style Guide" that can help you to write a Encounter Report/Review that will meet the criteria for Premium Access.

• https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2469618

As to the statement of no email being sent to inform of the Moderator's determination, that is not possible.
When an Encounter Report/Review is Moderated and is Approved or Rejected the system sends the Email automatically.
The Staff cannot stop the sending of the email.
We do find that some of the email providers will block emails sent from an @eccie.net email address.
Other email providers will send these emails to the SPAM or JUNK Folders.

When you disagree or don't understand why a Moderator made the decision they have.
It is best to send the a respectful PM asking them why they made the choice they did.
Staff should respond in a timely fashion to your request with a respectful answer.
Posting a "Why was it rejected" question in one of the 1000's of Eccie Forums makes the post quite easy to miss.

Sending the PM to the Moderator places your question in a very much smaller group of things that require the Moderator's attention.
Most times, any issue can be resolved, and the Member normally has the ability to supply any missing information or explain why they feel the Encounter Report/Review does meet the Criteria to the Moderator.
This allows the Member to edit the Encounter Report/Review after the software has locked down the Post.
It also allows the Moderator to re-evaluate the Encounter Report/Review for PA Credit after the edits/corrections have been made.

I ask that you give me time to review this issue.

biomed1
Eccie Administrator

That's unacceptable and unfortunately all too common. Originally Posted by Raindog115

As noted in my reply above, The reply to a review after it has been worked is an automatic function - Staff has no control to send or not send the Message.

Your ROS has lots of important information about the details and set up of the meeting. You also included the details of the sexual parts of the encounter in more than one place. I agree with Raindog. Not giving you credit for this review undermines the purpose of this forum. Originally Posted by atitagain

As a part of looking into this issue, I has become clear that the Reviewer did not contact the Moderator listed in the Yellow Band.
As noted in my reply above - contacting the Moderator by PM with a Respectful PM can resolve most the these issues in a very timely manner.

Who moderates this forum? I've stopped posting reviews because no matter what I write, I can't get credit. Note: I've been here since the ASPD days.... Originally Posted by tboy

All reviews whether Approved r rejected appear on your Profile under the Eccie Encounter Tags.
A review of your Eccie Encounters Tab reveals that you have written 14 Reviews, with the last being posted in February 2022.
That review was approved for PA Credit.
Prior to that you submitted a Review in January 2018, which was also Approved for PA.
Don't really see the validity of your statement "no matter what I write, I can't get credit".