GROVER NORQUIST....NO FRIEND OF THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT

There is a war waging within the conservative movement; particularly as it relates to CPAC and ACU.

http://www.therightscoop.com/the-rea...vited-to-cpac/

and


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/heather...usion-n1524853
I'm not going to watch your silly videos so....Let me guess...like Karl Rove, he is advocating that the GOP should nominate candidates that can actually win elections? As opposed to the whackadoos that you and the "American Conservative Movement" (AKA, the Tea Nuts) support?
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 03-03-2013, 09:17 AM
I've been telling you for years Grover was no CONSERVATIVE
Sorry Timmyboy; way off base..........................
Yes. but for all the wrong reasons.....
I've been telling you for years Grover was no CONSERVATIVE Originally Posted by WTF
Thanks W. I like the end...

Conclusion: CPAC and the ACU are bought and sold for money and influence. Worse still, they are under the heavy influence of people that want to destroy this nation. Pam Geller isn’t the problem. Time to oust Keene, Khan, and Norquist, otherwise I think I agree with John Zeigler. I want no part of CPAC or the ACU
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 03-03-2013, 10:50 AM
Yes. but for all the wrong reasons..... Originally Posted by Whirlaway
You're no CONSERVATIVE either btw...
I am for small government, more liberty, more individual irresponsibility, returning federal powers to the states, and less debt; if that is your definition of NOT being a conservative your the fool.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 03-03-2013, 11:09 AM
I am for small government, more liberty, more individual irresponsibility, returning federal powers to the states, and less debt; if that is your definition of NOT being a conservative your the fool. Originally Posted by Whirlaway
sounds good...

Those are your words, you and your Tea Party cohorts actions are another thing.

EXTXOILMAN's Avatar
I am for small government, more liberty, more individual irresponsibility, returning federal powers to the states, and less debt; if that is your definition of NOT being a conservative your the fool. Originally Posted by Whirlaway
+1.
You're no CONSERVATIVE either btw... Originally Posted by WTF
Whirly is a Trending Idiot. That's close!
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 03-03-2013, 11:28 AM
+1. Originally Posted by EXTXOILMAN
Another Poser.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=poser

WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 03-03-2013, 11:30 AM
http://www.kirkcenter.org/index.php/...ve-principles/

Seventh, conservatives are persuaded that freedom and property are closely linked. Separate property from private possession, and Leviathan becomes master of all. Upon the foundation of private property, great civilizations are built. The more widespread is the possession of private property, the more stable and productive is a commonwealth. Economic levelling, conservatives maintain, is not economic progress. Getting and spending are not the chief aims of human existence; but a sound economic basis for the person, the family, and the commonwealth is much to be desired.
WTF thinks he is THE EXPERT on all things conservative............

too fucking funny............