Prematurely locked review part 2

Regarding the locking of the review, Bridget Downtown NOLA, this mod claims that since the appointment occurred on 6/12 (it was actually 6/15), the comments on 7/21 were beyond the 30 day rule. The review was posted 6/26. My understanding is the 30 day threshold starts from the posting date as opposed to the date of the encounter. Is this not the case?

Join Date: Dec 31, 2009 Originally Posted by Raindog115

and you still don't know those that are infallible
ALL SALES FINAL




"rules" usually have a purpose.

• I recognize the need to be current.
• I recognize the inefficiency of bumping old reviews.
• I recognize I don't make the rules.

What if a provider review prompts a discussion /Q&A? I know.....'start a new thread in co-ed or private'...separate from the review, in a completely different forum.


memories of the anal retentive chef come to mind ` busy body micro management




Maybe I don't understand the obsessiveness behind interrogating every single post from every member. Aren't we 'in the business' of generating traffic/clicks? Based on the behavior of this site, sharing information about the hobby really isn't in the top 5 priorities.