Can a woman actually be too hot to be a banker?
Evidently her boss at this bank thought so and fired her for her hotness.
http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-06-...ork-in-a-bank/
I wonder what line of work she might be better suited for?
Unfortunately, this case will never go to court because the devious bank made her sign a form stating disputes would be handled by an arbitrator.How did CitiBank "make" her sign it? Arbitration agreements like that are very common and there is nothing sinister or devious about them.
Because Citibank made Lorenzana sign a mandatory-arbitration clause as a condition of her employment, the case will never end up before a jury or judge. An arbitrator will decide. Citibank officials won't comment on the suit.
Looks like this lady will have to play out this case with a ummh,
. . . "stacked deck". Originally Posted by Fast Gunn
How did CitiBank "make" her sign it? Arbitration agreements like that are very common and there is nothing sinister or devious about them. Originally Posted by PullTArbitration is a devious ploy because it stacks the cards in favor of the company.
but an arbitrator chosen by the company will naturally be more sympathetic to their side than to the person filing the suit.Actually, the company does NOT choose an arbitrator. Normally, a list of 3 is provided, and each side strikes one, leaving the remaining one as the arbitrator to hear the case.
The company made her sign it as a condition of employment. Originally Posted by Fast Gunn