WHY ARE FEDERAL TAXES MUCH HIGHER THAN STATE TAXES?

because it's easier to move from one state to another than to move from the US to another country...........

Unless your corporate like GE ! The leftist policies (high taxes and over regulation) of Obama will drive American corporations off shore. It is already happening !!!

The marxist cult drones don't realize that conservatives have no problem, except for abortion, with their crazy policies being implemented on the state level provided their insanity is consistent with the state's constitution......the Federal government should be limited to enumerated powers and the states can make their constitutions as crazy as they want.....there will always be conservative states to move to to avoid the craziness.....then the marxist cult drones can fucks themselves to the cows come home [then do the cows].............

because it's easier to move from one state to another than to move from the US to another country........... Originally Posted by Marshall

Federal Taxes are higher than state taxes simply because it takes more money to fund the entire country than it does individual states. Federal taxes, just to name a few fund the space program, Our Military, Politics, Medical research, education, ect. State revenues fund similar programs but on a much smaller scale and only within the boundries of the respected states. Also a State can apply for Federal Grant money on some projects. It's like getting your money back to use for a worthy cause. Federal Taxes can be viewed as investing in our country sort of speak.

Federal Taxes are higher than state taxes simply because it takes more money to fund the entire country than it does individual states. Federal taxes, just to name a few fund the space program, Our Military, Politics, Medical research, education, ect. State revenues fund similar programs but on a much smaller scale and only within the boundries of the respected states. Also a State can apply for Federal Grant money on some projects. It's like getting your money back to use for a worthy cause. Federal Taxes can be viewed as investing in our country sort of speak. Originally Posted by acp5762

ACP, don't you realize such heracy is NOT allowed on here? It is blatantly illegal to use logic in discussions with Marshall since he is clearly challenged in that area.

A little simple research would have shown him that the Federal budget has bigger ticket items than the state governments, but that is far too simple. More importantly, it doesn't support the RWW agenda of people who wish to rant and howl at the moon.

The surest sign of an extremist of any ilk is to hear them state an unequivical fact (such as "federal taxes > state taxes") and then say, "See, it proves god is on MY side and those who disagree are evil!", even when there is no logical connection--just as in Marshall's OP.

Then when their illogic is pointed out they come back with another logical non-sequitor. Just watch, I bet Old M will do just that here, won't you?

Go wrap yourself in your States Rights Stars & Bars M, your ideas are indeed a century and a half stale. Folks like you almost make me wish we let the south leave.

A simpleton's wrong answer ACP ......The correct answer is the GDP of the US was $14.3 trillion in 2010; while the average for the 50 states is 1/50th....thus the US tax rate should be signficantly lower because the federal government taxes the total GDP; while the individual states must tax only the GDP within their respective state. However, the money grubbing politicans like to spend beyond our means; so they tax beyond our ability to pay. You see, the states (48 of 50) must operate with a balanced budget, but the Federal politicians do not ! They can spend without consequence. Well at least for a time being, untill the world creditors hit us over the head with their club !

Don't be fooled. We will lose our AAA credit rating, if a balanced budget ammendment isn't passed.

Your dumbness is excused because you are a liberal and illiterate on economic issues.

Federal Taxes are higher than state taxes simply because it takes more money to fund the entire country than it does individual states. .... Federal Taxes can be viewed as investing in our country sort of speak. Originally Posted by acp5762

A simpleton's wrong answer ACP ......The correct answer is the GDP of the US was $14.3 trillion in 2010; while the average for the 50 states is 1/50th....thus the US tax rate should be signficantly lower because the federal government taxes the total GDP; while the individual states must tax only the GDP within their respective state. However, the money grubbing politicans like to spend beyond our means; so they tax beyond our ability to pay. You see, the states (48 of 50) must operate with a balanced budget, but the Federal politicians do not ! They can spend without consequence. Well at least for a time being, untill the world creditors hit us over the head with their club !

Your dumbness is excused because you are a liberal and illiterate on economic issues. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Even you you, that is a completely illogical reply. Reread ACP's comment about what the Fed vs State budgets are spent on. Then maybe you can reply to the actual topic. Try it some time, you might like it for a change.

your ideas are indeed a century and a half stale. Originally Posted by Old-FarT

Another marxist cult drone who thinks the Constitution is outdated and disagrees with it.....he doesn't disagree with my understanding of the Constitution being correct HA! HA! HA!HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! Get the fuck out commie....let's see how you like life somewhere else........

Another marxist cult drone who thinks the Constitution is outdated and disagrees with it.....HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! Get the fuck out commie....lets see how you like life somewhere else........ Originally Posted by Marshall

You are now 0 for 2 Marshall.

Can't think logically, now you can't do basic math.

I was CLEARLY (if you bothered to think) not referring to the constitution. The constitution is 200+ years old, which, dividing by 100 means 2+ Centuries.

One and a half centuries ago was the Civil War. And your side lost, Mas'a.

0 for 2 Marshall.

Can't think logically, now you can't do basic math.

I was CLEARLY (if you bothered to think) not referring to the constitution. The constitution is 200+ years old, which, dividing by 100 means 2+ Centuries.

One and a half centuries ago was the Civil War. And your side lost, Mas'a. Originally Posted by Old-FarT

Lincoln was a republican....the KKK and Jim Crow proponents were democrats.......I am not a democrat.......why is it that marxist cult drones like you profess to care so much for blacks, but fuck them up the ass all the time.......you scum think that blacks are genetically inferior and can't compete with white people so you want to help them out by discriminating against whites with your affirmative action programs.......we're gonna deport your ass to Buttfuckistan where you will be happier........WDF said tonight is your night to work the glory-hole in the men's room of DNC headquarters.....HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

BTW: you say I'm illogical, but do not say what was illogical.....get your face outta Odumbo's lap and let us know........
BTW2: the Constitution was more closely adhered to 150 years ago.........

[quote=Marshall;1515019]Lincoln was a republican....the KKK and Jim Crow proponents were democrats.......I am not a democrat.......why is it that marxist cult drones like you profess to care so much for blacks, but fuck them up the ass all the time.......you scum think that blacks are genetically inferior and can't compete with white people so you want to help them out by discriminating against whites with your affirmative action programs.......we're gonna deport your ass to Buttfuckistan where you will be happier........WDF said tonight is your night to work the glory-hole in the men's room of DNC headquarters.....HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

BTW: you say I'm illogical, but do not say what was illogical.....get your face outta Odumbo's lap and let us know........
BTW2: the Constitution was more closely adhered to 150 years ago...There certainly was a lot less of one.......[/quote]

The KKK and Jim Crow proponets were hardcore southern democratic conservatives.

weren't conservatives called "classical liberals" 150 years ago?.......wouldn't want anyone to think modern day conservatives have racist roots when modern day liberals have racist roots, trunks, limbs and leaves..........just sayin'

Lincoln was a republican....the KKK and Jim Crow proponents were democrats.......I am not a democrat.......why is it that marxist cult drones like you profess to care so much for blacks, but fuck them up the ass all the time.......you scum think that blacks are genetically inferior and can't compete with white people so you want to help them out by discriminating against whites with your affirmative action programs.......we're gonna deport your ass to Buttfuckistan where you will be happier........WDF said tonight is your night to work the glory-hole in the men's room of DNC headquarters.....HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

BTW: you say I'm illogical, but do not say what was illogical.....get your face outta Odumbo's lap and let us know........
BTW2: the Constitution was more closely adhered to 150 years ago......... Originally Posted by Marshall

Example #2 of your hate mongering. Or do you consider this how you speak nicely?

And--sorry to disapoint you--you have now flunked your favorite subject, politics. The lable isn't the important thing, it's the substance and thought behind it. The KKK of the 1800s is the same philosophy of the Southern RWWs today, one I suspect you are exceedingly familiar with.

As to what is illogical, you condemn yourself each time you open your mouth.

As to what is illogical, you condemn yourself each time you open your mouth. Originally Posted by Old-farT

you still haven't said what is illogical....when you disagree with me, then I know I am logical.......tick tick tick tick.....time is slipping away and you keep saying I'm illogical, but don't identify what it is.......your accusation is looking impotent.....go ahead and prove you're not a clown just shooting his mouth off.....you're like Saddam declaring victory over the US....LOL! : clapping:

Sorry, I've lost interest at watching you make a fool of yourself. I actually have some work to do and they are getting ready to board my flight. Smooch, smooch!