Funny, if the democrats had ran anyone besides Hillary this election would be over.

JD Barleycorn's Avatar
James Webb would be 10 pts ahead and I might voted for him. Have said this for years, if the democrats could find a moderate to run rather than America hating radicals.
James Webb would be 10 pts ahead and I might voted for him. Have said this for years, if the democrats could find a moderate to run rather than America hating radicals. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I could see that, knowing what I know now.

TRUMP IS MY MURDER WEAPON AND THE ESTABLISHMENT IS MY VICTIM.

Let's do this!!! Killem both with one shot!




James Webb would be 10 pts ahead and I might voted for him. Have said this for years, if the democrats could find a moderate to run rather than America hating radicals. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
If the republicans had anyone but shit for brains, they would be winning in a cake walk. Neither side likes either one.
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 10-08-2016, 09:12 PM
So very true.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
Everyone else running for the Republican nomination were the same type of Establishment puppet as Hillary. They don't have the corrupt and criminal background, but there wouldn't be much difference. Maybe Rand Paul would have been good. Not sure but the rest were cookie cutter Establishment hacks.
If the republicans had anyone but shit for brains, they would be winning in a cake walk. Neither side likes either one. Originally Posted by i'va biggen
The big difference is ever since Barrack won in 2008, it was a forgone conclusion that another rDEM wouldn't challenge him in 2012 and that Hillary would surely run in 2106. The GOP had 8 years to produce a viable candidate to challenge Hillary and we pick this dipshit?
Yssup Rider's Avatar
NEWS FLASH -- Drumpf's daughter is a "piece of ass..."