Living like a king on the (borrowed from China) taxpayer dime. But this really shouldn’t surprise anyone as he’s the biggest spender in world history:
http://www.therightscoop.com/while-a...s-under-obama/
http://washingtonexaminer.com/spendi...8#.UIqN4YbF3j5
- Whirlaway
- 10-26-2012, 09:43 AM
- i'va biggen
- 10-26-2012, 03:44 PM
Will Mittens get takeout from Burger King?
- Whirlaway
- 10-26-2012, 04:01 PM
Probably; or delivery DiGorno...........
- Guest123018-4
- 10-26-2012, 06:08 PM
Let them eat cake......
- Little Stevie
- 10-26-2012, 07:15 PM
Living like a king on the (borrowed from China) taxpayer dime. But this really shouldn’t surprise anyone as he’s the biggest spender in world history:
http://www.therightscoop.com/while-a...s-under-obama/
http://washingtonexaminer.com/spendi...8#.UIqN4YbF3j5 Originally Posted by Whirlaway
Where were your stupid posts bemoaning poverty under Bush, you racist Wingnut?
- Guest123018-4
- 10-27-2012, 11:08 AM
Less poverty under Bush than under Obama, Lil Racist, check the facts......
- IIFFOFRDB
- 10-27-2012, 12:45 PM
Where were your stupid posts bemoaning poverty under Bush, you racist Wingnut?You are the RACIST Fucker...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fiBzAIBlHE
Originally Posted by Little Stevie
- i'va biggen
- 10-27-2012, 03:51 PM
You can find all kinds of crap on you tube I don't believe any of it.Left or right..
- icuminpeace
- 10-27-2012, 09:41 PM
But we need more defense spending.
- Guest123018-4
- 10-27-2012, 10:07 PM
I think I understand your position. You believe that the federal government should spend more money to keep the impoverished in poverty than to find ways of creating jobs to get them out of poverty.
Rather than to create job opportunities so that people can work and earn a decent living you would rather just take the money from taxpayers and give it to them to ensure their dependence on the federal government.
Rather than to create job opportunities so that people can work and earn a decent living you would rather just take the money from taxpayers and give it to them to ensure their dependence on the federal government.
- CuteOldGuy
- 10-27-2012, 11:16 PM
You are right, 2Dogs. Remember, dependent people are dependable voters. The last thing government wants is for people to understand they can make it without government assistance. Then government would lose a lot of its power, and (shudder!) they might not be re-elected! It's about money and power. It is not about doing what is right.
- fishingtwo
- 10-27-2012, 11:31 PM
Yep
- Guest123018-4
- 10-28-2012, 09:24 AM
Of course, it is also about control.
This is why we are constantly fed the propaganda on a daily basis. This is why the same old tired "issues" are rolled out at election time to divide the electorate and the candidates along with the electorate fall into the same tired routine believing they are making a difference.
Then come the fools that believe that when a government legislates a persons rights that they gain more freedom while failing to realize that they have just given up control of their rights and that they are now the property of the government.
This is why we are constantly fed the propaganda on a daily basis. This is why the same old tired "issues" are rolled out at election time to divide the electorate and the candidates along with the electorate fall into the same tired routine believing they are making a difference.
Then come the fools that believe that when a government legislates a persons rights that they gain more freedom while failing to realize that they have just given up control of their rights and that they are now the property of the government.