Election changing voter fraud discovered

We on the right have been saying this for some time (of course the liberals said it about Michigan in 2016) that voter fraud is changing the outcome of elections. The election in THIS case is New Hampshire. We'll save South Dakota, Washington, and Missouri for a different day. Anyway, NH has a same day registration law. The idea is that if some idiot forgot that an election was coming up until the last day, they could register and vote. That also means that the state does not have time to check ID to see if it is valid so all the votes get counted. In 2016's general election NH had 6,500 voters who used out of state driver's licenses to register. Nine months later only 1,000 voters had gotten a new NH driver's license so they seem to be valid voters. That leaves 5,500 questionable votes. Of those left, 200 had registered cars in the state which tends to justify their existence. That leaves 5,300 votes that are very questionable. 200 people are being investigated for 'double voting' voter fraud. We'll round that down to 5,000 quite possible illegal votes. How does that affect the election?
Hillary Clinton won NH by 2,736 votes. The democrats have been caught many times bussing in voters to NH. This time was no different. Take away those illegal votes and Trump would have very likely won NH which won't have changed the outcome but would have embarassed Hillary even more.
The important thing is that Kelly Ayotte lost the election by 1,017 votes and a democrat took her seat in the US Senate. Take away those illegal votes and Ayotte wins the election and the GOP has a 53-47 edge in the Senate. That one vote means that the Obamacare repeal PASSES.
So voter fraud has cost this country big, democratic voter fraud in New Hampshire. California, New York, and Illinois refuse to release their public records to the Kobach Voter Fraud Project.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...hire-presiden/

Were they bused on Russian made buses?

Were they bused on Russian made buses? Originally Posted by LexusLover

LOL!!! more collusion!!!

We on the right have been saying this for some time (of course the liberals said it about Michigan in 2016) that voter fraud is changing the outcome of elections. The election in THIS case is New Hampshire. We'll save South Dakota, Washington, and Missouri for a different day. Anyway, NH has a same day registration law. The idea is that if some idiot forgot that an election was coming up until the last day, they could register and vote. That also means that the state does not have time to check ID to see if it is valid so all the votes get counted. In 2016's general election NH had 6,500 voters who used out of state driver's licenses to register. Nine months later only 1,000 voters had gotten a new NH driver's license so they seem to be valid voters. That leaves 5,500 questionable votes. Of those left, 200 had registered cars in the state which tends to justify their existence. That leaves 5,300 votes that are very questionable. 200 people are being investigated for 'double voting' voter fraud. We'll round that down to 5,000 quite possible illegal votes. How does that affect the election?
Hillary Clinton won NH by 2,736 votes. The democrats have been caught many times bussing in voters to NH. This time was no different. Take away those illegal votes and Trump would have very likely won NH which won't have changed the outcome but would have embarassed Hillary even more.
The important thing is that Kelly Ayotte lost the election by 1,017 votes and a democrat took her seat in the US Senate. Take away those illegal votes and Ayotte wins the election and the GOP has a 53-47 edge in the Senate. That one vote means that the Obamacare repeal PASSES.
So voter fraud has cost this country big, democratic voter fraud in New Hampshire. California, New York, and Illinois refuse to release their public records to the Kobach Voter Fraud Project.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...hire-presiden/ Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

yeah, I saw that article.

didn't know sen. ayotte lost.

she may or may not be a factor in the obamacare vote. you had two progressive republican ladies voted against obamacare in order to protect PPH.

ayotte is somewhat progressive.

yeah, I saw that article.

didn't know sen. ayotte lost.

she may or may not be a factor in the obamacare vote. you had two progressive republican ladies voted against obamacare in order to protect PPH.

ayotte is somewhat progressive. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Why in the world would you want to talk common sense to the_real_Barleycorn?


.

Why in the world would you want to talk common sense to the_real_Barleycorn?


. Originally Posted by WTF

not common sense... but a practical reality.

Voter fraud? Who won the election?

Voter fraud? Who won the election? Originally Posted by bamscram

In New Hampshire, Hillary won...with illegal votes. We have 50 individual elections for president. Whoever wins the correct ones becomes president.

In New Hampshire, Hillary won...with illegal votes. We have 50 individual elections for president. Whoever wins the correct ones becomes president. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Correct ones? Oh, the ones you support. Got it.

Correct ones? Oh, the ones you support. Got it. Originally Posted by bamscram

No numbnuts. The ones that add up to a majority.

We on the right have been saying this for some time (of course the liberals said it about Michigan in 2016) that voter fraud is changing the outcome of elections. The election in THIS case is New Hampshire. We'll save South Dakota, Washington, and Missouri for a different day. Anyway, NH has a same day registration law. The idea is that if some idiot forgot that an election was coming up until the last day, they could register and vote. That also means that the state does not have time to check ID to see if it is valid so all the votes get counted. In 2016's general election NH had 6,500 voters who used out of state driver's licenses to register. Nine months later only 1,000 voters had gotten a new NH driver's license so they seem to be valid voters. That leaves 5,500 questionable votes. Of those left, 200 had registered cars in the state which tends to justify their existence. That leaves 5,300 votes that are very questionable. 200 people are being investigated for 'double voting' voter fraud. We'll round that down to 5,000 quite possible illegal votes. How does that affect the election?
Hillary Clinton won NH by 2,736 votes. The democrats have been caught many times bussing in voters to NH. This time was no different. Take away those illegal votes and Trump would have very likely won NH which won't have changed the outcome but would have embarassed Hillary even more.
The important thing is that Kelly Ayotte lost the election by 1,017 votes and a democrat took her seat in the US Senate. Take away those illegal votes and Ayotte wins the election and the GOP has a 53-47 edge in the Senate. That one vote means that the Obamacare repeal PASSES.
So voter fraud has cost this country big, democratic voter fraud in New Hampshire. California, New York, and Illinois refuse to release their public records to the Kobach Voter Fraud Project. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

And the fact those states KEEP refusing to do so, even though those 'records should be PUBLIC knowledge', shows they are trying to hide something.

Proof of fraud? No.

Something to look into, sure. It's laughable to call it proof.

Trumps voter fraud commission head thinks that because only a small percent of people who did the same day registration with out if state licenses have also registered for cars, as of August 30th, that equals proof of voter fraud.

The cart is pulling the horse on that position.

There are dozens of reasons why people didn't registered a car.

There are dozens of reasons why people with out of state licenses could register legitimately to vote.


Yes, voter fraud could have happened. It might have. No irrefutable proof has been shown that it did, however.

In New Hampshire, Hillary won...with illegal votes. We have 50 individual elections for president. Whoever wins the correct ones becomes president. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

You do not know that and have offered up no proof.




Trumpy Cat!
BANNED



Join Date: Sep 5, 2017
Location: The white house
Posts: 21

Yes, voter fraud could have happened. It might have. No irrefutable proof has been shown that it did, however. Originally Posted by grean

And what exactly will it take to make you say "yip, that is irrefutable proof"??

Proof of fraud? No.

Something to look into, sure. It's laughable to call it proof.

Trumps voter fraud commission head thinks that because only a small percent of people who did the same day registration with out if state licenses have also registered for cars, as of August 30th, that equals proof of voter fraud.

The cart is pulling the horse on that position.

There are dozens of reasons why people didn't registered a car.

There are dozens of reasons why people with out of state licenses could register legitimately to vote.


Yes, voter fraud could have happened. It might have. No irrefutable proof has been shown that it did, however. Originally Posted by grean

Dozens of reasons....since you have to change your driver's license within 60 days after moving to New Hampshire, care to give us some of those dozens of reasons that nine months later they still have not changed their registration? How about dozens of reasons that people with drivers licenses have not registered their cars? Finally, what are those dozens of reasons that someone living in another state can legally go to NH and vote in a presidential election?