Perfection??

I have been thinking about this for a while. When you guys do reviews do you feel the need to point out every flaw if the lady is not a Barbie type? do you sometimes downplay it or maybe embellish?Does it make a difference if she has a pimple on her nose? or stretch marks.....is it really needed to point out every flaw or just a few? or I have notice some ladies no flaws are pointed out and to my knowledge aside from a Barbie doll no woman is perfect...so help me understand....

I think it's necessary to point out things that are not accurate when advertising. Misleading things. A girl that advertises to be a spinner and has pics at all the right angles to make her look so and actually isn't - should be pointed out.
I do think these things should be pointed out in a respecful and cordial way, though. It should never be intended to insult but to simply inform people.
However, little blemishes here and there I don't think are necessary as long the advertiser isn't claiming to be 'perfect'.
Besides, I think if the service and attitude of the provider is good the little things can be over-looked.

Give us a little credit. lol We can tell usually when the pics are shaded just right or they look like the standard porno poses. I usually can tell right away if the pics are fake. As far as perfection we all know it just doesn't happen. Even when you get that "hot" gal her personality usually gets in the way. We like you ladies imperfections and all

Most reviews will cover "flaws" that are not apparent in the Providers Pictures. A good example is exccessive belly fat, hail damage or the like that is hid by creative photography or clothing such as a corset.

Tatoos are often mentioned, because many Providers hide these because they are sure fire identification marks. There are Hobbyist who do not care for tattoos, so the info is valuable as part of a review.

Bad teeth, bad smell, bad face, these are mentioned quite often as well because these are the things that many providers intentionally hide the most often.

I personally think Providers do themselves a disservice by "over photoshopping" their pics to where the lady who answers the door bears little resemblance to the Lady in the pics. Men would much rather know exactly what they are about to get into, (pun intended).

I agree, Shayla.

Personally, I don't write reviews and I don't really read them much either. I don't even have access to the BCD stuff, because I have no use for it and find it tacky.

All I am interested in is what is on the menu and if your pics are fairly recent and accurate. If that peaks my interest, I will contact you... and if it goes well... I'll see you again.

I'm not perfect and I don't expect you to be either. If the same woman from the photos is the one answering the door, we're all good.

Models and escorts are not the same thing.
If you're a bigger/shorter/taller/black/white etc. woman and your pics advertise that - men will see you because they WANT what you're advertising.
Accuracy and honesty is key. If you can supply that the "low blows" will be minimal. Dishonesty will get you in trouble.

Good god. Who cares about barbies? Give me a bratz doll any day! Lmbo :-)

Good god. Who cares about barbies? Give me a bratz doll any day! Lmbo :-) Originally Posted by Naomi4u

How about a smurf?

Models and escorts are not the same thing.
If you're a bigger/shorter/taller/black/white etc. woman and your pics advertise that - men will see you because they WANT what you're advertising.
Accuracy and honesty is key. If you can supply that the "low blows" will be minimal. Dishonesty will get you in trouble. Originally Posted by Shayla

well said Shayla ...

Id rather be an upgrade when they meet me vs a downgrade

LOL @ Shayla! :-)

I don't think the review needs to be disrespectful of the lady. But if she happens to be missing some teeth that should be in the review.

well said Shayla ...

Id rather be an upgrade when they meet me vs a downgrade Originally Posted by Sweet N Little

Thats a great way to look at this subject.
When I look at an add I figure odds are the picture is the most flattering one she has. I have yet to meet one of those girls who "look better than her picture" I'm sure they are out there. Beauty for sure is in the eye of the beholder I'm sure if one of these 25yr old girls were picking I wouldnt be high on her list. I think perfect is out there I have met a few who I wouldnt change a thing about. They were perfect for me.

well something like that yes but i have seen things on other sites and was like wow really that didn't need to put in there.....

I don't think the review needs to be disrespectful of the lady. But if she happens to be missing some teeth that should be in the review. Originally Posted by simpleton

well something like that yes but i have seen things on other sites and was like wow really that didn't need to put in there..... Originally Posted by Irish Vixen

My assumption is they would add those "little things" in because they had a poor experience.

My reviews are more focused on are they as advertised and did they provide a quality service. I don't try to get into details other than to encourage others to see them if I feel they make the effort to ensure the client is satisfied. My reviews are probably shorter than many would like but they provide what is needed.