Really? So the 50 “current and former intel officials” who claimed the laptop was fake, 95% of journalists who spread lies about Trump/Russia for years, and all the minions who parroted them, should all be tossed out on their asses? That’d leave Twitter with about 4 users.
Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
Where is this laptop and where is the information that is so incriminating on it? I heard Miranda knows, but besides a bunch of pics of Hunter, with nefarious chemicals and hookers, really not much more. Hell Trumpy likes him some hookers too; And his adderal. So really, the point of making twitter about facts vs. propelling more false impressions. False as only allegations vs. proof. I would say that proof of bad deeds, just like a hooker and a john being caught balls deep, vs someone saw someone and they looked like a hooker. And thats the same for the Russia thingy too. What you all seem to regurgitate is what Billy Barr said about the Mueller report, not what people who read it thought. Barr was in an appointed position, and his conclusions-while to the delight of the PubeTards, said he was not part of obstruction and partial based on the non-conclusionary statement of the report saying it would defer to the constitutional consideration of no indicting or criminally prosecuting a sitting president. HE NEVER SAID THERE WAS NO THERE, -THERE. Of course- Trump claims he's innocent, but only of being smart, because the reality was that the decision was based on the above statement in the majority. Even if there was substantial proof to indict or claim interference, Mueller wasn't able to gain the cooperation of the administration, but did find enough circumstantial evidence to refer to the AG for a definite conclusion. Barr was that difinitive conclusion and decided that there wasn't enough there, despite all the pleas' and the indictments of Russians. Funny how you all wail that he's innocent- because Trump claims he is, but in reality, it was Barr's judgement of the man who appointed him. The same Bill Barr who under oath said Trumps claims were Bullshit. When under oath, he tells the truth, but when it's his opinion only, he can claim that the sun rises and sets on Donald J.
27 indictments of Russians and Americans, and Pardons for a whole lotta ppl who supposedly were innocent. Hmm.. Are you really that daft to think that innocent ppl need pardons. Pardons are not for that anyway. Typically a pardon is given due to people being contrite. An expression of the presidents foregiveness and recognition of the applicants acceptance of responsibility for the crime. IT DOES NOT SIGNIFY INNOCENCE.
So- what other BS do you want to throw against the wall, ...how about "her emails"?