Quick Question for the Gentlemen


If a gentleman goes to see a SA girl. Why does he put her
SA link in the encounter report where all can see? Why not put it in the ROS?
From what I have read If SA see any of the girls information on a Provider Clientele exchange website they Deactivation her account.
I had read a provider post who was also on there say she can only change her hair and clothes so much.
So my question is do you know that happens to the girls profile after you write a review?
If you do know that's what happens then why do you do it?
If you don't know that happens would you be a little bit more Cautious about what you post in the open?

I'm just curious that's all
myren1900's Avatar
First a disclaimer: I am not using Seeking Arrangements (SA) myself.
It is a site to connect Sugar Daddies and Sugarbabes and in my opinion the agreement between the man and the woman should be discreet and not reviewed. T is a private matter. The women are usually not available to every guy out there. The arrangement will likely depend on the chemistry between the Sugar Daddy and the woman.

If reviews are posted, the girl’s SA handle should at least be somewhat protected by only being in the ROS as suggested by MissJae

So she posted on a "whore" board complaining about the possibility of being banned on SA?

Come on now.. talk about stupid.

Fuck SA though right? Thats why they dont want people like that on there. Posting everywhere possible that they sell pussy for a living then have the nerve to complain they were banned from a site that forbids selling pussy. Jesus
Correct me if im wrong but back when eccie had bio pages didn't alot of the girls on SA also have eccie bio pages aswell or just posted on provider sites in general like AS and STG?

Personally i didn't know about that rule on SA but if that is the case why do alot of the girls on SA also have multiple escort profiles available to the public other than SA?
So she posted on a "whore" board Asking about the possibility of other Providers that are on SA being banned for receiving reviews?

Come on now.. talk about stupid.

Fuck SA though right? Thats why they dont want people like that on there. Posting everywhere possible that they sell pussy for a living then have the nerve to complain they were banned from a site that forbids selling pussy. Jesus Originally Posted by butthosurfer
I fixed that for you Ma'am .....

Anyways I agree with you myren1900.

eccie had bio pages didn't alot of the girls on SA also have eccie bio pages aswell
No they did not have their SA links in their eccie profiles. Nor would you see the same pictures on SA as you did here. Why because the Lady knows the repercussions. If she had Combined the 2 the guys wouldn't have to ask for contact information or how much was it in the comments.
Correct me if im wrong but back when eccie had bio pages didn't alot of the girls on SA also have eccie bio pages aswell or just posted on provider sites in general like AS and STG?

Personally i didn't know about that rule on SA but if that is the case why do alot of the girls on SA also have multiple escort profiles available to the public other than SA? Originally Posted by Ballistixz
Yeah they cross posted a lot I dont care one way or another it's not my problem.

The thing about SA is they are trying to make a buck just like everyone else. But you have dumb whores and I'm not saying all whore are dumb, post on hooker boards have their phone number posted on escort or hooker sites or even host their own hooker website then bitch about being banned from a site that forbids hookers.

Its hilarious. Dont get me wrong though I'm not complaining its entertainment for me
Audreyg's Avatar
First a disclaimer: I am not using Seeking Arrangements (SA) myself.
It is a site to connect Sugar Daddies and Sugarbabes and in my opinion the agreement between the man and the woman should be discreet and not reviewed. T is a private matter. The women are usually not available to every guy out there. The arrangement will likely depend on the chemistry between the Sugar Daddy and the woman.

If reviews are posted, the girl’s SA handle should at least be somewhat protected by only being in the ROS as suggested by MissJae

Originally Posted by myren1900
I agree with a lot of this. It's always rubbed me the wrong way when I see encounter reports of ladies from SA. I'm sure it's true there are some people who are both escorts and on SA, but some folks are genuinely just trying to be sugar babies and using the website for dating. It seems unethical to review someone who does't even know their information is going up on this website, sharing their contact info, ect.