...So what is the litmus for becoming a reputable reviewer/member hobbiest? ex: reviews, posts, associations, etc.
Originally Posted by KoolHandLuke
Reviews: One who writes honest reviews...by that I mean someone who tells the good & the bad of a session, if there was any bad. Also, one who has the "balls" to give an accurate description of a lady. Sometimes pictures are, well, "old"
Posts: I think the way a person post should matter versus how many post they have, although some post-hoes do give good input from time to time
Associations: I tend to value this one the most. Meeting guys at socials, private gatherings, and even hanging out at non-hobby related events helps to build "trust" with one another.
Example, I'll take the word from an associate who
didn't write a review of a provider over someone who I've never heard of or don't know who actually
wrote a review of that same provider....just sayin'
...Also what would disqualify someone from being one?
Originally Posted by KoolHandLuke
Being a douchebag about covers it...