SCOTUS and The Travel Ban

".... when it comes to refugees who lack any such connection to the United States, for the reasons we have set out, the balance tips in favor of the Government’s compelling need to provide for the Nation’s security. See supra, at 9–11; Haig v. Agee, 453 U. S. 280, 307 (1981)."


The Opinion: 9 in favor including 3 who concur

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinion...-1436_l6hc.pdf

Trump is WINNNING.

And the 9th circuit court go's
Again

Trump is WINNNING. Originally Posted by bambino

My question is...

When will the left get tired of losing?

Fuck the 9th Circuit those cocksuckers.

That's about The 999,999th time the 9th has been reversed.

That's about The 999,999th time the 9th has been reversed. Originally Posted by Jackie S

And 9/0.

And 9/0. Originally Posted by bambino

Welcome back

It was not a total win for Trump. He has gotten part of what he asked for but hardly everything.
"Mr. Trump's administration could enforce its immigration ban against certain people while it waited for the Supreme Court to hear arguments and decide the case." That will happen later this year.

"The Justices agreed with the appeals court that certain people should be allowed to come to the United States as long as they have what the court called "a credible claim of bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States."

I did not think that the first travel ban was constitutional. I think the courts in declaring the second travel ban unconstitutional were more than likely incorrect.

The big question to me is when will Trump and his team start investigating the vetting processes of immigrants and refugees to determine if changes are deemed necessary? The travel ban asked for a period of 90/120 days. Let's get going and whether or not the ban is or is not legal will be a moot point.

My question is...

When will the left get tired of losing? Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

They don't know they're losing, they think they are winning because they can call Trump a bigot, misogynist, racist, homophobic whatever comes to mind. Grandiosity at it's finest.


Jim

My question is...

When will the left get tired of losing? Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

When did the right get tired of losing?

It is a political pendulum enjoy the ride.

Try not to be too stupid act like you seen the end zone before.... pray you don't end up like Gay Rey!

Twitler is an ugly reflection of an ugly nation.

With lemmings.

Twitler is an ugly reflection of an ugly nation.

With lemmings. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

if keeping America safe is ugly .. then so be it.

would you rather pretty little terrorists with rainbow condoms .. er hijabs on their heads?

you wouldn't take in a refugee family and you know you asshole.

That's about The 999,999th time the 9th has been reversed. Originally Posted by Jackie S

One wonders with their piss poor track history, and the sheer # of times they ahve been overturned, WHY THAT court is still in existence..

I did not think that the first travel ban was constitutional. I think the courts in declaring the second travel ban unconstitutional were more than likely incorrect.

Speed. How did you think the first one was unconstitutional, but the 2nd one was..

One wonders with their piss poor track history, and the sheer # of times they ahve been overturned, WHY THAT court is still in existence.. Originally Posted by garhkal

that's due to politics. people in congress have tried for 30-40 years to split the 9th district.

one only have to look at the 5th & 11 district to see how long it took to split the 5th district into 11th district. This was the last change Congress did to the court composition. the push started in the 1970s and was done in 1980s. the 5th district split was controversial at that time. The 9th district split was supposed to occur at the same time.