Called upon to do the impossible for the ungrateful...

the members of the US military are looking forward to a 1% pay raise from Obama. It was going to be an entire 1.8% but Obama (who spent over $1 billion on getting reelected and nearly $700 million on vacations) cancelled the other .8% because the country is still in recovery. This is about one half of what Obama spent on the election and less than he spent on vacations. Since Pelosi thinks that unemployment payments help the economy why wouldn't well deserved pay increases for the military also help the economy?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2...Nearly-In-Half

Fuck you, coward.

When and where did YOU serve, basement boy?

Fuck you, coward.

When and where did YOU serve, basement boy? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Did you ask Obaminable that question?

Or did you give him an affirmative action pass?

The only people who can ask a stupid question like that had better know what their DD214 says. If not...

(had to wait for someone to reflect FuckZup's comments)

Fuck you, coward.

When and where did YOU serve, basement boy? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Why would anyone have to ''serve'' to stand up for the military?

AssUp gets bitched slapped ........let's see if Assup makes an intelligent rebuttal...................

Did you ask Obaminable that question?

Or did you give him an affirmative action pass? Originally Posted by LexusLover

BAM !

AssUp is bitched slapped again !


Waiting on Assup to make an intelligent rebuttal !

Why would anyone have to ''serve'' to stand up for the military? Originally Posted by thisguy23

yeah, it's kinda like all of the armor our troops didn't get on their humvees back in the 00's.

yeah, it's kinda like all of the armor our troops didn't get on their humvees back in the 00's. Originally Posted by Randy4Candy

I'm curious to find out why the House republicans didn't fund the total amount of the pay raise

Because of Obama's sequestration cuts !

Because of Obama's sequestration cuts ! Originally Posted by Whirlaway

As usual, Wrong Again!!! Congress voted for the sequestration cuts because the House Teawipes didn't have the votes (familiar story) to accomplish anything but to not accomplish anything. This was supposed to back Congress up against the wall to get together and do the peoples' business. Well, that worked out great, huh? It's not Obama's sequestration, it's the Teawipe sequestration. Just be honest and go to the actual causes of things, Trendaway. But, we all know how well you deal with facts when they are placed next to a shiny piece of horsesh*t.

Because of Obama's sequestration cuts ! Originally Posted by Whirlaway

oh yeah the sequestration cuts that took bipartisan votes to make it a reality ...

The Sequestration cuts that Obama proposed and demanded Congress pass.

The same cuts that Obama threatened a veto if Congress tried to restore the cut funding (for the military) ! But don't rely on my word; Here is what PolitiFact says:

Whose sequester?

In the debate, Obama said he didn’t propose sequestration, Congress did. (We asked the White House for comment, but didn't hear back.) To determine the question of ownership, we turned to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward’s new book The Price of Politics. Woodward’s reporting shows clearly that defense sequestration was an idea that came out of Obama’s White House.

The Sequestration cuts that Obama demanded Congress pass.

The same cuts that Obama threatened a veto if Congress tried to restore the cut funding (for the military) ! Originally Posted by Whirlaway

and Obie keeps demanding the House republicans repeal Obamacare too ...

I don't know what Obamacare has to do with Obama not funding the military....I guess it is your weak attempt to change and deflect from the thread topic.