For those of you who ride without helmets and believe you are just as safe as those who ride with helmets --
http://www.mercurynews.com/nation-wo...-reduce-deaths
A lot can be said on both sides. Many, many variables. I question if either of you ride or have ridden long...I am a cyclist not a motorcyclist. Wouldn't be caught dead (excuse the pun) riding without a helmet. I know that even standing still on my bike I could fall and hit my head and be seriously injured without a helmet. My top speed is about 30 and I'd hate to think what would happen if I crashed at that speed. I RARELY see a cyclist without a helmet. I would estimate 50% of the motorcyclists I see do not wear helmets.
I have been riding for 45 years. Been hit twice by a car with broken bones the result in both collisions.
I do wear a helmet for the majority of my rides but not always. I appreciate that it is my decision to wear a helmet or not. Originally Posted by Gentleman
I won't drive around the block without a helmet...but in Texas its too hot to wear the other gear most of the year. If you go down at speed its all relative I guess. Originally Posted by ToyzI was driving to and from Brenham on 290 last Friday/Sunday. Packed with bikers. Small minority wearing helmets. I agree with you that if you are riding at 50-60 mph, a helmet isn't going to do anything to save you.
As a person who shattered L femur in 8pcs , broke every rib on L side, fractured 3 vertabrae in neck , guarantee you I would not be here if I had not worn one. Totalled my body and bike , only damage to Suburban that made L turn in front of me was a melon sized dent where my head stuck like a dart in the fender. I'm all for your freedom to decide to wear one or not , as long as we have the freedom to decide if we pay for your hospital bills , or possible law suites . Originally Posted by rockerrickI guess you didn't know.. In Texas, if you don't wear a helmet, you have to have proof of personal hospitalization insurance. That's not required if you have a helmet on. They can, and sometimes do, stop you without a helmet to see if you have the insurance. That was the concession when the helmet law was repealed years ago. It's fair... if my dumb-ass gets hurt due to not wearing (by my choice) a helmet, I have to prove I am financially able to scrape up what's left of my brains and go to the hosp.
I was driving to and from Brenham on 290 last Friday/Sunday. Packed with bikers. Small minority wearing helmets. I agree with you that if you are riding at 50-60 mph, a helmet isn't going to do anything to save you. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXXThe most dangerous area to ride is in downtown traffic. Seldom are there wrecks on the highway compared to intersections in town.
Nuglet even with medical insurance these incidents still degrade into finger pointing with nobody accepting responsibility . My case I had insurance but insurance company points finger elsewhere , then the legal precedings begin , they end up degrading into road design flaws and etc. 6 years later shit gets resolved to no ones liking , and that medical insurance you had cancels after first set of bills they have to pay , and now you have a pre-existing condition. Good luck getting insured after that . And anytime an insurance company pays out WE ALL pay eventually ! Originally Posted by rockerrickI'm not arguing that point, I just pointed out that there are laws attempting to make the rider responsible for his choice not to wear a helmet. I don't understand that they don't work. Aren't all law written perfectly, with no loopholes? surprise surprise.