A question--why would we want "credible deniability" if we were to see a Transexual provider? I would think ECCIE of all places would be tolerant enough to where one wouldn't have to hide or deny who we saw...
Originally Posted by 7071949597
Historically, and I'm referring mostly to ASPD, boards were not tolerant of any potential bi activities, unless it was completely female on female.
Thankfully, the wonderful owners of this board allowed us to create Another Realm and for the past few years, it's MY goal for people to be able to express their sexual desires in a safe and non-threatening environment.
But I still remember, this has been years ago, where I would suggest that I'm looking for a man who is bi-flexible to join in an appointment and my topic was closed.
I tried it a few times. And the VERY few times that I saw alternative reviews on there, men would just razz the reviewer and say that he's gay. It was a negative atmosphere during that time.
NOW, and I do believe that porn has some credit to this, there are people who realize that as you get older ... well, you just wish to TRY something and experience all that life and your personal sexuality has to offer.
I have no problem with someone just preferring to be plain vanilla. Heck, in MOST ways ... I'm rich vanilla myself.
It IS a complete joy to have this forum where experiences and the discussion of such is more accepted. I love it.
But denying seeing a trannie in the general areas? I can see that. Many escorts will not see a guy who frequents trannies. Or at least, that's what I hear a lot.
I would have been like that years ago. Now? I've changed.
Hopefully, this trend will continue!
Back to the topic at hand!!!
Best,
Elisabeth