How are we going to beat this?

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...lot_fraud.html

Message: I am a retired mail man.

I just saw your War Room interview.
I now know where the mules got their ballots. Straight from the post office in returned/undeliverable mail.
While I have zero proof of where they ended up, I had those ballots you were talking about in my mail bag with wrong addresses or lacking apartment numbers or even people that moved and still had ballots delivered to their old apartment.
We put those ballots in a basket and someone came by and picked them up.
Hundreds or even thousands of ballots.
Who picked them up, where did they go?
Now we know why signature match was removed…
Someone needs to investigate the post office and their democratic union run activities.

The people that need to do the investigating are all under the thumb of the Justice Dept, which of course is totally sold out to the Liberal/Socialist/Progressive/Democrat agenda.

So, don’t hold your breath.

The only way to defeat these types of occurrences is for every person to vote Republican.

What a bunch of bullshit.
No city or state. No date.

Just another baseless claim from the same gang who made up the election fraud story because trump got his ass handed to him.

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...lot_fraud.html

Message: I am a retired mail man.

I just saw your War Room interview.
I now know where the mules got their ballots. Straight from the post office in returned/undeliverable mail.
While I have zero proof of where they ended up, I had those ballots you were talking about in my mail bag with wrong addresses or lacking apartment numbers or even people that moved and still had ballots delivered to their old apartment.
We put those ballots in a basket and someone came by and picked them up.
Hundreds or even thousands of ballots.
Who picked them up, where did they go?
Now we know why signature match was removed…
Someone needs to investigate the post office and their democratic union run activities. Originally Posted by Redhot1960

Maybe millions of votes were in the bucket!!
What signature match was removed? Where?
Just another ignorant trumpy attempt that only makes trump look more full of shit by the minute.

If you did see this and are only now saying something (after seeing a show still talking about the totally debunked mule theory), you aren't credible.
Strange there still is no evidence and no witnesses willing to sign a statement that has a penalty for lying. The same thing that kept the vast majority from signing them when it might of mattered.

Key here is "zero proof". Self admitted fail.

The key here is "reading is fundamental".

"While I have zero proof of where they ended up,"

The only thing he applied "zero proof" to was their ultimate destination.
He is trying to maintain all of his story is true.

I agree with you. His entire story has zero proof.

If you knew the story was bullshit/had zero proof, did you mean how do we beat a constant stream of lies and misinformation coming from trumpys? I think a good start would be not to post it without vetting it.
I would try to beat it by proving it wrong/exposing obvious flaws. Which was pretty easy in this case.

Key here is "zero proof". Self admitted fail. Originally Posted by reddog1951

Just a small sampling of vote corruption. Democrats don’t want secure voting, for obvious reasons, and if you do they’ll pretend you’re whatever label they pick this week.

Just a large sampling of bullshit. And you pass it along because you were told to.
I don't change labels and I sure don't pretend what you are.
That couldn't be more obvious.

Just a small sampling of vote corruption. Democrats don’t want secure voting, for obvious reasons, and if you do they’ll pretend you’re whatever label they pick this week. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Just a large sampling of bullshit. And you pass it along because you were told to.
I don't change labels and I sure don't pretend what you are.
That couldn't be more obvious. Originally Posted by Tigbitties38

The Democrats are full of BS, as they don't want voter ID or anything close to having an accurate count of the vote.

Just a small sampling of vote corruption. Democrats don’t want secure voting, for obvious reasons, and if you do they’ll pretend you’re whatever label they pick this week. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

correct

Just a large sampling of bullshit. And you pass it along because you were told to.
I don't change labels and I sure don't pretend what you are.
That couldn't be more obvious. Originally Posted by Tigbitties38

if you say so

Just a large sampling of bullshit. And you pass it along because you were told to.
I don't change labels and I sure don't pretend what you are.
That couldn't be more obvious. Originally Posted by Tigbitties38

... And what's that?

#### Salty

What a bunch of bullshit.
No city or state. No date... Originally Posted by Tigbitties38

I see where you got tripped up. The prerequisites are listed in the article URL. One must be A) An American and B) A Thinker. Beyond that, one would have to comprehend the overall gist of the topic(s) at hand. The anecdotal retort by a mail carrier is largely irrelevant, though indicative. BTW: you did catch the part where the author stated that they interviewed multiple mail carriers. Right? Oh, also the multiple cities and States mentioned. Right?

What the author is conveying is that we have tremendous computing resources that only need the right programming (super-compute technology - fractal vs SQL) and we can uncover vast amounts of fraud in elections and up and down the government funding food chain, in any and all States. We could potentially save 10X more $$ than Bidenomics has wasted in it's first year.

He is spot on - IMMHO. Scanning/comparing multiple massive data sets simultaneously, at light speed, concurrently across thousands of compute nodes is the way to battle the wide array and conveyances of fraudsters. Hell, who knows, it could potentially even fix the Ekky search engine.

Clearly, Jay will have to be Aaron Swartz'd for this.

I see where you got tripped up. The prerequisites are listed in the article URL. One must be A) An American and B) A Thinker. Beyond that, one would have to comprehend the overall gist of the topic(s) at hand. The anecdotal retort by a mail carrier is largely irrelevant, though indicative. BTW: you did catch the part where the author stated that they interviewed multiple mail carriers. Right? Oh, also the multiple cities and States mentioned. Right?

What the author is conveying is that we have tremendous computing resources that only need the right programming (super-compute technology - fractal vs SQL) and we can uncover vast amounts of fraud in elections and up and down the government funding food chain, in any and all States. We could potentially save 10X more $$ than Bidenomics has wasted in it's first year.

He is spot on - IMMHO. Scanning/comparing multiple massive data sets simultaneously, at light speed, concurrently across thousands of compute nodes is the way to battle the wide array and conveyances of fraudsters. Hell, who knows, it could potentially even fix the Ekky search engine.

Clearly, Jay will have to be Aaron Swartz'd for this. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

So you can be from Mexico , Peru or Columbia....as long as you think about crap

I see where you got tripped up. The prerequisites are listed in the article URL. One must be A) An American and B) A Thinker. Beyond that, one would have to comprehend the overall gist of the topic(s) at hand. The anecdotal retort by a mail carrier is largely irrelevant, though indicative. BTW: you did catch the part where the author stated that they interviewed multiple mail carriers. Right? Oh, also the multiple cities and States mentioned. Right?

What the author is conveying is that we have tremendous computing resources that only need the right programming (super-compute technology - fractal vs SQL) and we can uncover vast amounts of fraud in elections and up and down the government funding food chain, in any and all States. We could potentially save 10X more $$ than Bidenomics has wasted in it's first year.

He is spot on - IMMHO. Scanning/comparing multiple massive data sets simultaneously, at light speed, concurrently across thousands of compute nodes is the way to battle the wide array and conveyances of fraudsters. Hell, who knows, it could potentially even fix the Ekky search engine.

Clearly, Jay will have to be Aaron Swartz'd for this. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

agree

So you can be from Mexico , Peru or Columbia....as long as you think about crap Originally Posted by matchingmole

Uh .. wut??

Another baseless claim of voter fraud in the 2020 election.

We are now 32 months past election day 2020 and not one claim of significant voter fraud has been found. It's time to give it up and focus on 2024.

I see where you got tripped up. The prerequisites are listed in the article URL. One must be A) An American and B) A Thinker. Beyond that, one would have to comprehend the overall gist of the topic(s) at hand. The anecdotal retort by a mail carrier is largely irrelevant, though indicative. BTW: you did catch the part where the author stated that they interviewed multiple mail carriers. Right? Oh, also the multiple cities and States mentioned. Right?

What the author is conveying is that we have tremendous computing resources that only need the right programming (super-compute technology - fractal vs SQL) and we can uncover vast amounts of fraud in elections and up and down the government funding food chain, in any and all States. We could potentially save 10X more $$ than Bidenomics has wasted in it's first year.

He is spot on - IMMHO. Scanning/comparing multiple massive data sets simultaneously, at light speed, concurrently across thousands of compute nodes is the way to battle the wide array and conveyances of fraudsters. Hell, who knows, it could potentially even fix the Ekky search engine.

Clearly, Jay will have to be Aaron Swartz'd for this. Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do

LET THE GOOD TIMES ROLL!