Juror says Zimmerman got away with murder

Yep.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2...t-awa/2587533/

The juror said the six-member, all-female jury followed Florida law and found the evidence did not warrant a murder conviction.

"You can't put the man in jail even though in our hearts we felt he was guilty,'' said the juror.

Zimmerman is guilty of homicide, not murder. It's a distinction you lib-retards fail to comprehend.

Zimmerman is guilty of homicide, not murder. It's a distinction you lib-retards fail to comprehend.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Actually not. There was no finding that he was guilty of ANYTHING.

The definitions with instructions required the jury to find him "not guilty" if by definition the homicide was "excusable" ... and in Florida "excusable homicide" is not a crime.

The only distinctive use of the term "homicide" would be differentiate a death from "suicide" or "accident" ... so a death finding should fall into the following categories:

homicide
suicide
accident
natural causes

in this case, according to Florida law, it would be "excusable homicide" ...

.. similar to "justifiable homicide" in result ... it is not a crime.

Yep.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2...t-awa/2587533/ Originally Posted by timpage

Nope:

"You can't put the man in jail even though in our hearts we felt he was guilty,'' said the juror.

I smell a book deal in the chumming stage. I hope they asked her to tell them who "we" is!

In my "heart" have an 18" dick.

he is guilty ...of being a dumb fuck

Yep.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2...t-awa/2587533/ Originally Posted by timpage

Well, then, it's a good thing for him he was tried before a jury, not a juror.

Because, as I recall, and CNN (among others) confirm, he was found "not guilty" of the charges brought against him by a jury.

(CNN) -- George Zimmerman never denied shooting Trayvon Martin, but he said he did so in self defense. Late Saturday night, a Florida jury found him not guilty in the teenager's death.


Emphasis mine, from http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/13/justice/zimmerman-trial

Case closed.

This has got to be a joke. The same person who identified the Korean plan crash victims as "Hung Dong", etc. probably is behind this stunt.

Zimmerman is guilty of homicide, not murder. It's a distinction you lib-retards fail to comprehend.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

And not proven guilty is not the same as proven innocent.

A distinction, as evidenced by this very thread, you and your kind fail to understand.

Yeah, assuming this isnt a joke, its a good way to secure a book deal without a backlash.

Telling the truth would mean death threats and no book deal. Its that simple.

And not proven guilty is not the same as proven innocent.

A distinction, as evidenced by this very thread, you and your kind fail to understand. Originally Posted by Doove

Your avatar is DEAD.

Nope:I smell a book deal in the chumming stage. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I'm always intrigued at how liberals are so self-centered and self-important and intellectually superior to the rest of the world that they can determine right out of the thin air they blow out their asses why people are doing things and have done things!


Doove .. you're the poster child for speculative and interpretative mind reading by liberals.

They not only know what the rest of us want and need, they know what we're thinking! Just ask them! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Hypocrite much?

The interesting statement she made is that she felt he was guilty, and had it been her decision would have convicted him, but admitted that the reason she changed her mind was because there was no proof. This justifies several people on a jury. She would have made an emotional decision.

Nope:

"You can't put the man in jail even though in our hearts we felt he was guilty,'' said the juror.

I smell a book deal in the chumming stage. I hope they asked her to tell them who "we" is!

I have an 18" dick. Originally Posted by LexusLover

now you are getting assup excited

not the same as proven innocent. Originally Posted by Doove

Just out of curiousity Doove, when, where and HOW is anyone in the US required to be "proven" innocent? Can you point me to ANY instance where someone HAS been "proven innocent"?

you just won't let this go will you timmy? a jury of Zimmerman's peers has ruled yet you, who claim such high moral fiber (take a shit please that fiber must be making you constipated) simply can't accept a lawful verdict. you flaunt your high morality yet the moment the verdict is in you post away about how "wrong" this verdict is. if you have no respect for the process .. STFU!

now, here's a few tidbits for you to ponder.

Jay Z Wades Into Trayvon Martin Controversy; Shock over "Blatant" Racism

http://music.yahoo.com/blogs/hip-hop...164505909.html

let me recap the finer points for you.

"If you ask yourself the question, Didn't Trayvon have a right to stand his ground? He was being chased. He fought back. He may have won. That doesn't mean he was a criminal."

yes, Jaytard, in Florida it's called assault.

he didn’t sleep for two days after the July 13 verdict.

with a wife like that and you can't sleep? try jacking off. Nyquil too.

Nugent dismissed Stevie Wonder's refusal to perform in Florida in response to the verdict.

"So 700 black people, mostly young children and young people were slaughtered in Chicago last year by black people, and not a peep out of Stevie Wonder."

Teddo exposes a truly BLIND hypocrite, Stevie Wondertard.

"determined that George Zimmerman acted in self-defense against a life-threatening attack by hoodlum, dope-smoking Trayvon Martin?"

the real Trayvon Martin, not the 12 year old the media and Obammy wanted to champion. Would Obammy really want a son like that?

remember, timmytard, if Martin hadn't been suspended from school for fighting and having traces of pot on him, he'd never have been in Sanford in the first place.

so there you have it, timmytard, take some EX-LAX and drop that self righteous turd and STFU.