Daisy of Lubbock

Date: July 16, 2011
Provider: Daisy
Phone: 806-241-6458
Email Address: -
URL / Website: http://lubbock.backpage.com/FemaleEs...m-e-24/3380417
City: Lubbock
State: Texas
Address: I don't know
Appointment Type: Incall
Did the Appointment take place at the agreed-upon time?: No
Activities: None
Session Length: None
Fee: She was asking $70
Hair Length and Color: Not sure. Long dark hair in pics
Age: 24
Smoking Status: I think so. Newport box in her pics
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: Very attractive. Thick and beautiful. Nice breasts.
Recommendation: No. Daisy talked to me for about an hr through text message then when it came time for the appointment she ignored me completely. Do not recommend

It appears that you have an agenda for someone who did not see you during an alert for the Lubbock area. No one knows for sure what happened between the two of you except a conversation never took place according to your own review; and that your account has now been DEACTIVATED. You never had an appointment with her (but you submitted a review?); and your comments are highly suspicious (perhaps you are LEO or you are a pimp trying to coerce someone into your employment - she doesn't have to see you if she is uncomfortable with you for whatever reason.) That's my 2 cents and now I am out of here continuing my hiatus - this definitely says something negative and suspicious about the user deadlyquiet (and others like him.) Trying to sabotage someone's reputation is a tactic that should be highly suspect. I am glad this account got deactivated.

Good reply to a two week old thread with no replies. AHJ on the job!

Good reply to a two week old thread with no replies. AHJ on the job! Originally Posted by Three Piece Chicken Dinne

My reply was within the rules of this site - it was not over 30 days old. <---<<<

I simply hate to see someone (Daisy) get trashed for apparently someone's agenda. Since this is her only bad review on this site - it should be deleted (imho).

There was never an appointment... it was just trash talk. Should a negative review be allowed when there was never an appointment???? I doubt seriously if this hurts her reputation; but I wanted to "attach" my comments to this only negative review when this cheap tactic is so blatantly obvious. A new user with no previous reviews, trash talk, account deactivated. He was most likely either LEO or a disgruntled pimp trying to coerce her, or an offensive client wannabe. Any provider can say No.

Your reply absolutely within the rules of the site. Yes!

I would absolutely never suggest a review get deleted because it is a provider's only negative review and/or it could hurt her reputation. That is what reviews are for.

I see that DeadlyQuiet's account was disabled. I think that speaks for itself. I highly doubt anyone would read this review, come to the conclusion that Daisy is a bad provider, and choose not to book an appointment with her. If anything, bumping this thread hurts her more as it brings attention to it...

Your reply absolutely within the rules of the site. Yes!

I would absolutely never suggest a review get deleted because it is a provider's only negative review and/or it could hurt her reputation. That is what reviews are for.

I see that DeadlyQuiet's account was disabled. I think that speaks for itself. I highly doubt anyone would read this review, come to the conclusion that Daisy is a bad provider, and choose not to book an appointment with her. If anything, bumping this thread hurts her more as it brings attention to it... Originally Posted by Three Piece Chicken Dinne

My reasoning to delete the review is not because it was a negative review; but because there was no appointment. A date never occurred and why should "make believe" comments be attached to anyone's review profile?

According to your logic I can submit a review on Jade (in Lubbock) which never occurred and trash her throughout the review for something that never happened. The criteria is illogical if truthful reviews are the desired outcome. Why tolerate such obvious dishonesty - after all i am AnHonestJohn.

Isn't the "review" process based on a reality appointment? - Nothing happened between them, he decides to trash her ??? It's not like he lost money, had a bad time, got robbed, nothing bad happened to him - NO appointment for whatever the reason. It really sounds like she did the smart/right thing by not seeing him.
He was just trouble.

These are one sided comments for something that did not occur. It does not hurt her - attaching honest comments to her already good reviews should help bring objectivity to anyone who does a search on her reviews on this site. I am glad that the account got deactivated. In that sense we can disagree - L8r. I am off this site for a while -

She might decide to become listed with ECCIE. I think she has been thinking about it. It is her decision.

NCNS reports are to be listed right here. This is permissible and expected. They are posted here to give the lady an opportunity to rebut the information given.

It is also expected that a WK or two will pop up to defend the ladies honor on these type threads. A NCNS is the report of one persons experience and no one elses. So while one person may always have good experiences with a particular lady that doesn't mean everyone else will. It will not be deleted, the lady in question has ample opportunity to give her side of the story. This is exactly as the rules of the site are written.

Everyone is quite capable of looking at the OP history and forming their own opinion as to the validity of the information given.

I will also note that when an account is disabled, it is at the members request. Not due to any rule violations or bans.

NCNS reports are to be listed right here. This is permissible and expected. They are posted here to give the lady an opportunity to rebut the information given.

It is also expected that a WK or two will pop up to defend the ladies honor on these type threads. A NCNS is the report of one persons experience and no one elses. So while one person may always have good experiences with a particular lady that doesn't mean everyone else will. It will not be deleted, the lady in question has ample opportunity to give her side of the story. This is exactly as the rules of the site are written.

Everyone is quite capable of looking at the OP history and forming their own opinion as to the validity of the information given.

I will also note that when an account is disabled, it is at the members request. Not due to any rule violations or bans. Originally Posted by Chica Chaser

Then one might come to the conclusion that after having read this review that I became her WK; and that after he trashed her that he requested his account to become disabled (which was his only purpose.) His only contribution to this site was to offer a make believe review on something that he admitted did not take place. He was never harmed in way... very strange criteria. An appointment never took place for whatever reason; and then he does a review on this site for something which never occurred. <---<<<

Isn't the review process supposed to be about a real date not dates that never happened?

I doubt seriously that she would reply since she is not an official ECCIE lady.

Well AHJ, if one criteria for not posting reviews or for requesting deactivation is due to claiming a contact that never happened then maybe you should look in the mirror. You may pm me for details if you would like.

it was just trash talk. Originally Posted by AnHonestJohn

Nothing happened between them, he decides to trash her ??? Originally Posted by AnHonestJohn

I might be missing something but how did he trash her?

Then one might come to the conclusion that after having read this review that I became her WK; Originally Posted by AnHonestJohn

Hey pal, you have to earn the WK label. It takes a lot of hard work to get that. I think you have it in you though. You can do it champ!

Well AHJ, if one criteria for not posting reviews or for requesting deactivation is due to claiming a contact that never happened then maybe you should look in the mirror. You may pm me for details if you would like. Originally Posted by CryptKicker

Chica only revealed that deadlyquiet requested that his account be deactivated - nothing else. I did not realize it... no big deal. It was not deactivated by ECCIE staff at their behest. He created an account for a purpose then requested it be closed after his purpose was accomplished.

That is all those comments reveal - nothing else.

Strange criteria - a user can submit a review on someone and admit that an appointment did not take place, no money was exchanged, no one was harmed in any way, and can still give them a negative review - strange criteria, indeed.

I used to have an another account on this site at one time and requested that it be done away with - I am heading down to the gulf coast for a while. L8r.

I still don't what flipped your wig. He said he doesn't recommend her because she ignored him. Is that really what is setting you off?

I still don't what flipped your wig. He said he doesn't recommend her because she ignored him. Is that really what is setting you off? Originally Posted by Three Piece Chicken Dinne

1. Refer to my very first comment on this thread. In all reality he most likely was a disgruntled pimp that was trying to coerce her into his service - he was just a drive by shooter on this website. Created an account to trash her business and hope she would have to come to work for him. He probably was not a cop - just someone to lazy to earn a living for himself. He was probably not a legitimate client, either.

Now I am off for the nite - this time for real. I am packin, l8r. I am not a WK it was just a reference to Chica's comments (sort of I am - a sense of fair play.)

Be safe everyone

It is kinda funny that he came to her defense a day before she was busted in the prostitution sting with her low life pimp.