Brain Damaged Fetterman needs two massive screens in front of him to conduct an interview

Showing once again Racist Fetterman is a brain damaged mindless idiot who can't function as a burger flipper at McDonalds, let alone as a US Senator.

Watch:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1588306572542812160

Following the debate between Fetterman and Oz, Joe Rogan said of the former that he was "clearly compromised to the point where while he's communicating, he's not just stumbling, he's kind of lost in thought and can't form a coherent sentence."

"Why did they think they could put him out there on a huge stage like that?" Rogan asked, adding, "This is not against the guy. I don't know anything about this guy. I really don't. I just know he's the Democratic candidate. But what you're seeing is a guy that has a problem with his brain. That guy should be rehabilitating. He shouldn't be forced into a high-stress job in a public display... It's humiliating."

Racist Fetterman is obviously brain damaged, and he’s not getting any better

What should be really concerning for our “democracy,” are the number of libtards who will vote for him anyway

I'm no doctor, but I know a good bit about disabilities and reasonable accommodations. Screens aren't an issue, and are a reasonable accomodation. And this is a job that involves substantial amounts of staff where the Senator doesn't do nearly the amount of work most people think they do. So it's about communication and ultimately what his positions are. Not Joe Rogan's or Joe Rogan's thoughts on the matter.

Stephen Hawking could have been a Senator. So it's not about verbal communication, either. And John's no Stephen Hawking, I'll admit. But Chizzy's thoughts on whether Fetterman's current issues prevent him from doing the job are among the most germane and cogent I've seen. The way he laid out his thoughts show nuance and detail without relying on pandering and fear and were respectful of his human dignity.

I may write-in Chizzy for Senator as a result, even if we have strong disagreements on some policy. I feel I can trust him to do what's right more often than not.

I think the most telling issue with Fetterman is the fact that the majority in Braddock don't want to vote for him. If you cannot get the small town that you run to back you how do you expect the state to? I know people who were on the fence prior to the debate. They saw Oz as nothing more than a TV personality wanting to continue his 5 mins of fame. After the debate they have all switched to the Oz side. I would be absolutely shocked to see Oz lose.

I think the most telling issue with Fetterman is the fact that the majority in Braddock don't want to vote for him. If you cannot get the small town that you run to back you how do you expect the state to? I know people who were on the fence prior to the debate. They saw Oz as nothing more than a TV personality wanting to continue his 5 mins of fame. After the debate they have all switched to the Oz side. I would be absolutely shocked to see Oz lose. Originally Posted by paintedbynumbers

Indeed. Fetterman is a fraud. He always has been and the people of Braddock know that. The town became worse under his leadership, businesses left, crime went up. He didn't show up to most of the council meetings. His hole shtick about how he cares and fixed Braddock is an utter lie. People in Braddock tell you that. Believe them

What's great about this is that you can look on this map and see Braddock broke to Fetterman 90% plus. So much for the "they don't want to vote for him" narrative.